- Tatjana Seizova-Cajic: Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW 1825, Australia. tatjana.seizova-cajic@sydney.edu.au
Muscle vibration excites muscle spindles and creates illusory movement of a body part in a blindfolded individual. It is followed by an aftereffect, an illusion of return movement when vibration stops. The aftereffect reflects adaptation in the proprioceptive system. This adaptation is susceptible to attentional manipulations (Seizova-Cajic and Azzi in Exp Brain Res 203(1):213-219, 2010), but it is not known whether it is open to cross-modal influences unaided by those manipulations. We attempted to answer this question by allowing vision of the vibrated, stationary arm. We asked our participants (n = 20) to retain focus on the feeling of movement. They reported any illusory movement during 60-s biceps vibration (at 90 Hz), as well as following its offset, when vision of the arm was removed. During vibration, the proprioceptive movement illusion persisted, although the stationary arm was visible, but its duration and strength were much reduced in comparison with the no-vision condition. The movement aftereffect, experienced in total darkness following vibration offset, was also substantially weaker. The results show that proprioceptive adaptation is strongly modulated by vision. We propose that two processes contribute: perceptual (cross-modal binding with conflicting vision reduces the proprioceptive movement signal) and attentional (view of a stationary arm distracts from the proprioceptive movement signal). Our finding that during vibration, participants felt movement in the arm they could see, which was stationary, shows that cross-modal binding partially failed. This happened because the two percepts were too discrepant. However, only one-the visual-appeared real, and we argue that such an outcome is consistent with general principles of intersensory integration.