[Impact on the primary carer of an intervention carried out on dependent elderly people].

Ram��n Orueta-S��nchez, Rosa M G��mez-Calcerrada, Samuel G��mez-Caro, Arancha S��nchez-Oropesa, M Jes��s L��pez-Gil, Pilar Toledano-Sierra
Author Information
  1. Ram��n Orueta-S��nchez: Centro de Salud Siller��a, Toledo, Espa��a. roruetas@gmail.com

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of joining a home care program on primary caregivers of dependent elderly people.
DESIGN: Non-randomised "before-after" intervention study.
SETTING: Primary Care.
PARTICIPANTS: Primary carers of elderly dependent people included in a home care program (n=156; 7.8% loss to follow up).
INTERVENTIONS: Inclusion in a home care program for chronically dependent elderly and the assessment of the primary carer in the same year. VARIABLES ASSESSED: perceived health, frequency of visits, questionnaires of quality of life (Nottingham questionnaire), psychological health (Goldberg questionnaire), social support (Duke-UNC scale) and overburden of caregivers (Zarit questionnaire) and satisfaction with care received.
RESULTS: There were no significant changes in perceived health. Improvement in the areas of energy, sleep, emotional and social relationship of the quality of life. Decreased attendance (8.4 vs. 7.5, p<0.05) and the percentage of overusers (30.1 vs 6.9%, P<.01). A reduced percentage of caregivers expressed low social support (8.3 vs 2.8%, P<.05) and caregiver overburden (56.4 vs 44.4%, P<.05). 90.3% of caregivers believed that care had improved at the end of intervention, with a significant improvement of satisfaction of overall medical and nursing care received (7.6 vs 8, 4, 7.9 vs 8.5 and 7 vs 8.5; P<.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Joining a home care program for dependents has a positive impact on their primary caregiver and improves their perception of care received, reducing their use of health services, reducing the level of overburden and their perceived lack of social support.

References

  1. Med Clin (Barc). 2000;114 Suppl 3:26-33 [PMID: 10994561]
  2. Enferm Clin. 2009 Sep-Oct;19(5):249-57 [PMID: 19736026]
  3. Aten Primaria. 2004 Sep 15;34(4):170-7 [PMID: 15388064]
  4. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003 Oct;26(4):922-53 [PMID: 14527761]
  5. Aten Primaria. 1993 Oct 15;12(6):345-9 [PMID: 8218816]
  6. JAMA. 1999 Dec 15;282(23):2215-9 [PMID: 10605972]
  7. J Palliat Care. 1994 Spring;10(1):29-36 [PMID: 7518507]
  8. Gac Sanit. 2007 Mar-Apr;21(2):106-13 [PMID: 17419926]
  9. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2004 Mar-Apr;78(2):201-13 [PMID: 15199798]
  10. Aten Primaria. 2008 Apr;40(4):193-8 [PMID: 18405584]
  11. Br J Gen Pract. 2004 May;54(502):374-81 [PMID: 15113523]
  12. Br J Gen Pract. 2005 Dec;55(521):956-61 [PMID: 16378566]
  13. Aten Primaria. 1999 Oct 31;24(7):404-10 [PMID: 10592548]
  14. Aten Primaria. 2003 Jun 30;32(2):77-83 [PMID: 12841992]
  15. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2008 May-Jun;43(3):157-66 [PMID: 18682133]
  16. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2002 Nov-Dec;76(6):713-21 [PMID: 12602139]
  17. Gerontologist. 2002 Jun;42(3):356-72 [PMID: 12040138]
  18. J Gerontol. 1991 Jul;46(4):P181-9 [PMID: 2071844]
  19. Am J Public Health. 1990 Jun;80(6):704-8 [PMID: 2343954]
  20. Aten Primaria. 1996 Sep 15;18(4):153-6, 158-63 [PMID: 8962994]
  21. Med Clin (Barc). 2003 Jun 28;121(4):132-3 [PMID: 12867016]
  22. Aten Primaria. 2000 May 15;25(8):526-8 [PMID: 10876943]
  23. J Gerontol. 1989 May;44(3):P61-71 [PMID: 2715587]
  24. Gerontologist. 1980 Dec;20(6):649-55 [PMID: 7203086]
  25. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(9):935-9 [PMID: 3067368]
  26. Med Care. 1988 Jul;26(7):709-23 [PMID: 3393031]
  27. Aten Primaria. 2003 May 31;31(9):587-91 [PMID: 12783749]
  28. Res Nurs Health. 2001 Oct;24(5):349-60 [PMID: 11746065]
  29. Fam Pract. 2002 Aug;19(4):339-43 [PMID: 12110551]
  30. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Apr;49(4):450-7 [PMID: 11347790]
  31. BMJ. 1988 Oct 8;297(6653):897-9 [PMID: 3140969]
  32. Soc Sci Med A. 1981 May;15(3 Pt 1):221-9 [PMID: 6973203]
  33. Aten Primaria. 2000 Sep 15;26(4):217-23 [PMID: 11100581]

MeSH Term

Aged
Geriatrics
Home Care Services
Humans

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0carevs78homeprogramprimarycaregiversdependentelderlyhealthsocial05P<interventionperceivedquestionnairesupportoverburdenreceived45impactpeoplePrimary8%carerqualitylifesatisfactionsignificantpercentage6caregiverreducingOBJECTIVE:evaluatejoiningDESIGN:Non-randomised"before-after"studySETTING:CarePARTICIPANTS:carersincludedn=156lossfollowINTERVENTIONS:InclusionchronicallyassessmentyearVARIABLESASSESSED:frequencyvisitsquestionnairesNottinghampsychologicalGoldbergDuke-UNCscaleZaritRESULTS:changesImprovementareasenergysleepemotionalrelationshipDecreasedattendancep<0overusers3019%01reducedexpressedlow3256444%903%believedimprovedendimprovementoverallmedicalnursing9CONCLUSIONS:Joiningdependentspositiveimprovesperceptionuseserviceslevellack[Impactcarriedpeople]

Similar Articles

Cited By