Reinforcing saccadic amplitude variability.

Céline Paeye, Laurent Madelain
Author Information
  1. Céline Paeye: Université Charles De Gaulle Lille III, Domaine universitaire du Pont de Bois, BP 149 59653 Villeneuve d'Ascq Cedex, France.

Abstract

Saccadic endpoint variability is often viewed as the outcome of neural noise occurring during sensorimotor processing. However, part of this variability might result from operant learning. We tested this hypothesis by reinforcing dispersions of saccadic amplitude distributions, while maintaining constant their medians. In a first experiment we reinforced the least frequent saccadic amplitudes to increase variability, and then reinforced the central part of the amplitude distributions to reduce variability. The target was placed at a constant distance from the fovea after the saccade to maintain the postsaccadic visual signal constant and an auditory reinforcement was delivered depending on saccadic amplitude. The second experiment tested the effects of the contingency. We reinforced high levels of variability in 4 participants, whereas 4 other participants were assigned to a yoked control group. On average, saccadic amplitude standard deviations were doubled while the medians remained mostly unchanged in the experimental participants in both experiments, and variability returned to baseline level when low variability was reinforced. In the control group no consistent changes in amplitude distributions were observed. These results, showing that variability can be reinforced, challenge the idea of a stochastic neural noise. We instead propose that selection processes constrain saccadic amplitude distributions.

Keywords

References

  1. Nat Neurosci. 2000 Aug;3(8):827-30 [PMID: 10903577]
  2. J Physiol. 2007 Jan 15;578(Pt 2):387-96 [PMID: 17008369]
  3. Nature. 2002 Jul 25;418(6896):413-7 [PMID: 12140557]
  4. Exp Brain Res. 2002 Jan;142(2):284-91 [PMID: 11807582]
  5. Vision Res. 1995 Mar;35(5):691-701 [PMID: 7900307]
  6. J Neurosci. 2008 Mar 12;28(11):2804-13 [PMID: 18337410]
  7. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2003;26:133-79 [PMID: 14527268]
  8. Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Dec;9(4):672-705 [PMID: 12613672]
  9. J Neurosci. 2002 Mar 15;22(6):2363-73 [PMID: 11896175]
  10. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jul;60(1):17-40 [PMID: 8354965]
  11. Nat Neurosci. 2000 Nov;3 Suppl:1212-7 [PMID: 11127840]
  12. Vision Res. 1979;19(1):57-61 [PMID: 419701]
  13. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jul;12(4):653-61 [PMID: 16811388]
  14. J Neurosci. 2007 Aug 15;27(33):8757-70 [PMID: 17699658]
  15. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Mar;74(3):704-14 [PMID: 9523413]
  16. Behav Processes. 1999 Jun;46(2):131-9 [PMID: 24895845]
  17. Neuron. 2003 Aug 14;39(4):693-700 [PMID: 12925282]
  18. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Nov;54(3):251-62 [PMID: 16812623]
  19. Nature. 1998 Aug 20;394(6695):780-4 [PMID: 9723616]
  20. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jul;60(1):171-84 [PMID: 8354966]
  21. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Oct;12(2):301-5 [PMID: 11587898]
  22. Arch Neurol. 1976 Apr;33(4):243-51 [PMID: 1083233]
  23. Invest Ophthalmol. 1976 Aug;15(8):657-60 [PMID: 955831]
  24. J Neurophysiol. 2003 Aug;90(2):972-82 [PMID: 12904499]
  25. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2000 Jan;26(1):98-111 [PMID: 10650547]
  26. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Jul;68(1):1-25 [PMID: 9241860]
  27. Exp Brain Res. 2009 Jul;196(4):475-81 [PMID: 19526358]
  28. Science. 1981 Jul 31;213(4507):501-4 [PMID: 7244649]
  29. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Apr;9(4):292-303 [PMID: 18319728]
  30. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000 Dec;1(3):199-207 [PMID: 11257908]
  31. Vision Res. 2000;40(20):2779-96 [PMID: 10960651]
  32. J Neurosci. 2003 Nov 5;23(31):10052-7 [PMID: 14602819]
  33. J Neurosci. 2006 May 17;26(20):5360-9 [PMID: 16707788]
  34. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Summer;33(2):151-65 [PMID: 10885524]
  35. J Neurophysiol. 2010 Jun;103(6):3302-10 [PMID: 20393067]
  36. PLoS One. 2008 Apr 30;3(4):e2070 [PMID: 18446209]
  37. Ann Neurol. 1978 Oct;4(4):313-8 [PMID: 727736]
  38. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996 Dec;37(13):2750-8 [PMID: 8977491]
  39. J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Mar;83(2):147-68 [PMID: 15828592]
  40. Vision Res. 1986;26(6):847-55 [PMID: 3750868]
  41. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Sep;52(2):155-66 [PMID: 2794841]
  42. J Neurophysiol. 1998 Nov;80(5):2405-16 [PMID: 9819252]
  43. Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Mar;8(1):177-84 [PMID: 11340864]
  44. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Jul;34(8):1103-20 [PMID: 20026351]
  45. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Summer;6(2):209-17 [PMID: 16795402]
  46. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Sep;9(5):581-91 [PMID: 5964515]
  47. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Sep;58(2):241-63 [PMID: 1402601]
  48. J Neurophysiol. 1985 Jul;54(1):110-22 [PMID: 4031979]
  49. Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Jun;9(2):250-8 [PMID: 12120786]
  50. Nat Neurosci. 2004 Sep;7(9):907-15 [PMID: 15332089]
  51. J Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct;98(4):2255-65 [PMID: 17699687]
  52. Biol Cybern. 2006 Jul;95(1):21-9 [PMID: 16555070]
  53. J Neurophysiol. 2006 Sep;96(3):1030-41 [PMID: 16672299]
  54. Brain Res. 2002 Nov 29;956(2):374-9 [PMID: 12445708]
  55. Vision Res. 2005 Dec;45(27):3391-401 [PMID: 16137738]
  56. J Neurophysiol. 2003 Aug;90(2):1235-44 [PMID: 12711711]
  57. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Winter;27(4):739-60 [PMID: 16795849]
  58. Prog Neurobiol. 2004 Jan;72(1):27-53 [PMID: 15019175]
  59. Behav Modif. 2003 Apr;27(2):251-64 [PMID: 12705108]

Grants

  1. R01 EY019508/NEI NIH HHS
  2. 1R01EY019508/NEI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Acoustic Stimulation
Conditioning, Operant
Humans
Reaction Time
Reinforcement, Psychology
Saccades
Stochastic Processes

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0variabilityamplitudesaccadicreinforceddistributionsconstantparticipantscontrolneuralnoisepartoperanttestedmediansexperimentsaccade4groupselectionSaccadicendpointoftenviewedoutcomeoccurringsensorimotorprocessingHowevermightresultlearninghypothesisreinforcingdispersionsmaintainingfirstleastfrequentamplitudesincreasecentralreducetargetplaceddistancefoveamaintainpostsaccadicvisualsignalauditoryreinforcementdelivereddependingsecondeffectscontingencyhighlevelswhereasassignedyokedaveragestandarddeviationsdoubledremainedmostlyunchangedexperimentalexperimentsreturnedbaselinelevellowconsistentchangesobservedresultsshowingcanchallengeideastochasticinsteadproposeprocessesconstrainReinforcinghumansmotorocularshaping

Similar Articles

Cited By