Impact of Scaffold Micro and Macro Architecture on Schwann Cell Proliferation under Dynamic Conditions in a Rotating Wall Vessel Bioreactor.

Chandra M Valmikinathan, John Hoffman, Xiaojun Yu
Author Information
  1. Chandra M Valmikinathan: Department of Chemistry, Chemical Biology and Biomedical Engineering Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, 07030.

Abstract

Over the last decade tissue engineering has emerged as a powerful alternative to regenerate lost tissues owing to trauma or tumor. Evidence shows that Schwann cell containing scaffolds have improved performance in vivo as compared to scaffolds that depend on cellularization post implantation. However, owing to limited supply of cells from the patients themselves, several approaches have been taken to enhance cell proliferation rates to produce complete and uniform cellularization of scaffolds. The most common approach is the application of a bioreactor to enhance cell proliferation rate and therefore reduce the time needed to obtain sufficiently significant number of glial cells, prior to implantation.In this study, we show the application of a rotating wall bioreactor system for studying Schwann cell proliferation on nanofibrous spiral shaped scaffolds, prepared by solvent casting and salt leaching techniques. The scaffolds were fabricated from polycaprolactone (PCL), which has ideal mechanical properties and upon degradation does not produce acidic byproducts. The spiral scaffolds were coated with aligned or random nanofibers, produced by electrospinning, to provide a substrate that mimics the native extracellular matrix and the essential contact guidance cues.At the 4 day time point, an enhanced rate of cell proliferation was observed on the open structured nanofibrous spiral scaffolds in a rotating wall bioreactor, as compared to static culture conditions. However, the cell proliferation rate on the other contemporary scaffolds architectures such as the tubular and cylindrical scaffolds show reduced cell proliferation in the bioreactor as compared to static conditions, at the same time point. Moreover, the rotating wall bioreactor does not alter the orientation or the phenotype of the Schwann cells on the aligned nanofiber containing scaffolds, wherein, the cells remain aligned along the length of the scaffolds. Therefore, these open structured spiral scaffolds pre-cultured with Schwann cells, in bioreactors could potentially shorten the time needed for grafts for peripheral nerve regeneration.

References

  1. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002 Oct;62(1):136-48 [PMID: 12124795]
  2. Biomaterials. 2008 Jan;29(1):33-46 [PMID: 17931702]
  3. Biomaterials. 2008 Oct;29(30):4065-73 [PMID: 18649939]
  4. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001 May;55(2):242-53 [PMID: 11255176]
  5. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2000 Oct 5;70(1):32-40 [PMID: 10940861]
  6. Biomed Mater. 2008 Sep;3(3):034124 [PMID: 18765899]
  7. Biomaterials. 2009 Sep;30(26):4336-47 [PMID: 19481253]
  8. Microsurgery. 2005;25(4):258-67 [PMID: 15934044]
  9. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2006 Aug;2(8):448-54 [PMID: 16932603]
  10. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 2004 Nov 25;153(2):163-73 [PMID: 15527884]
  11. J Cell Biochem. 1993 Mar;51(3):265-73 [PMID: 8501128]
  12. Neurol Res. 2004 Mar;26(2):218-25 [PMID: 15072642]
  13. J Biomater Appl. 2007 Nov;22(3):223-39 [PMID: 17255157]
  14. Tissue Eng. 2003 Jun;9(3):421-30 [PMID: 12857410]
  15. Exp Neurol. 1997 Jan;143(1):25-36 [PMID: 9000443]
  16. Neurol Res. 2004 Mar;26(2):151-60 [PMID: 15072634]
  17. Nanotechnology. 2009 Sep 23;20(38):385103 [PMID: 19713588]
  18. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2005;23(1):19-29 [PMID: 15846029]
  19. Biomed Environ Sci. 2006 Jun;19(3):163-8 [PMID: 16944770]
  20. Biotechnol Prog. 1998 Jan-Feb;14(1):134-40 [PMID: 9496678]
  21. J Orthop Res. 1999 Jan;17(1):130-8 [PMID: 10073657]
  22. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009 May;89(2):317-25 [PMID: 18431787]
  23. Biomacromolecules. 2007 May;8(5):1587-94 [PMID: 17429941]
  24. Biomaterials. 2003 Feb;24(4):649-54 [PMID: 12437959]
  25. Pharm Res. 2000 Jan;17(1):100-6 [PMID: 10714616]
  26. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009 Apr;15(4):739-40 [PMID: 19292675]
  27. Tissue Eng Part A. 2008 May;14(5):595-606 [PMID: 18399734]
  28. Tissue Eng. 2001 Oct;7(5):525-34 [PMID: 11694187]
  29. Microsurgery. 2001;21(3):96-101 [PMID: 11372069]
  30. J Neural Eng. 2008 Dec;5(4):422-32 [PMID: 18971515]
  31. Biomaterials. 2008 Feb;29(6):653-61 [PMID: 17983651]
  32. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Aug 3;101(31):11203-8 [PMID: 15277663]
  33. Int Orthop. 2000;24(3):121-5 [PMID: 10990379]
  34. Microsurgery. 2002;22(7):311-5 [PMID: 12404350]

Grants

  1. R03 NS058595/NINDS NIH HHS
  2. R03 NS058595-01A2/NINDS NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0scaffoldscellproliferationSchwanncellsbioreactortimespiralcomparedraterotatingwallalignedowingcontainingcellularizationimplantationHoweverenhanceproduceapplicationneededshownanofibrouspointopenstructuredstaticconditionslastdecadetissueengineeringemergedpowerfulalternativeregeneratelosttissuestraumatumorEvidenceshowsimprovedperformancevivodependpostlimitedsupplypatientsseveralapproachestakenratescompleteuniformcommonapproachthereforereduceobtainsufficientlysignificantnumberglialpriorInstudysystemstudyingshapedpreparedsolventcastingsaltleachingtechniquesfabricatedpolycaprolactonePCLidealmechanicalpropertiesupondegradationacidicbyproductscoatedrandomnanofibersproducedelectrospinningprovidesubstratemimicsnativeextracellularmatrixessentialcontactguidancecuesAt4dayenhancedobservedculturecontemporaryarchitecturestubularcylindricalreducedMoreoveralterorientationphenotypenanofiberwhereinremainalonglengthThereforepre-culturedbioreactorspotentiallyshortengraftsperipheralnerveregenerationImpactScaffoldMicroMacroArchitectureCellProliferationDynamicConditionsRotatingWallVesselBioreactor

Similar Articles

Cited By