Clinical research training of Peruvian neurologists: a baseline assessment.

Gian Carlos Navarro-Chumbes, Silvia Margarita Montano-Torres, Alberto Díaz-Vásquez, Joseph Raymond Zunt
Author Information
  1. Gian Carlos Navarro-Chumbes: School of Public Health and Administration, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru;

Abstract

In Peru, despite a strong clinical research infrastructure in Lima, and Masters degree programs in epidemiology at three universities, few neurologists participate in clinical research. It was our objective to identify perceived needs and opportunities for increasing clinical research capacity and training opportunities for Peruvian neurologists. We conducted a descriptive, cross-sectional survey of Peruvian neurologists in Lima and Arequipa, Peru. Forty-eight neurologists completed written surveys and oral interviews. All neurologists reported interest in clinical research, but noted that lack of time and financial resources limited their ability to participate. Although most neurologists had received some training in epidemiology and research design as medical students or residents, the majority felt these topics were not adequately covered. Neurologists in Arequipa noted international funding for clinical research was uncommon outside the capital city of Lima. We concluded that clinical research is important to Peruvian neurologists. The three main barriers to increased participation in clinical research identified by neurologists were insufficient training in clinical research methodology, meager funding opportunities, and lack of dedicated time to participate in clinical research. Distance learning holds promise as a method for providing additional training in clinical research methodology, especially for neurologists who may have difficulty traveling to larger cities for additional training.

Keywords

References

  1. Lancet. 2003 Mar 1;361(9359):712-3 [PMID: 12620731]
  2. Neurology. 2009 Mar 10;72(10):893-8 [PMID: 19273822]
  3. Lancet. 2001 Mar 3;357(9257):723-4 [PMID: 11247592]
  4. BMJ. 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):71-2 [PMID: 8555924]
  5. Teach Learn Med. 2008 Apr-Jun;20(2):114-7 [PMID: 18444196]
  6. Ann Neurol. 2006 Sep;60(3):278-85 [PMID: 16983684]
  7. J Public Health (Oxf). 2005 Jun;27(2):215-21 [PMID: 15820994]
  8. Acad Med. 2002 Oct;77(10 Suppl):S86-93 [PMID: 12377715]
  9. Acad Med. 2006 Mar;81(3):207-12 [PMID: 16501260]
  10. CMAJ. 1999 Jan 12;160(1):63-4 [PMID: 9934345]
  11. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2005 Sep;2(3):321-4 [PMID: 16136211]
  12. BMJ. 2000 Sep 30;321(7264):813-7 [PMID: 11009525]
  13. J Allied Health. 2009 Summer;38(2):e36-42 [PMID: 19753411]
  14. Ann Neurol. 1994 Jun;35(6):753-8 [PMID: 8210235]

Grants

  1. K23 AI001600/NIAID NIH HHS
  2. P30 AI027757/NIAID NIH HHS
  3. R01 NS055627/NINDS NIH HHS
  4. R21 NS048838/NINDS NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0researchclinicalneurologiststrainingPeruvianPeruLimaparticipateopportunitiesepidemiologythreeArequipanotedlacktimefundingmethodologyadditionaldespitestronginfrastructureMastersdegreeprogramsuniversitiesobjectiveidentifyperceivedneedsincreasingcapacityconducteddescriptivecross-sectionalsurveyForty-eightcompletedwrittensurveysoralinterviewsreportedinterestfinancialresourceslimitedabilityAlthoughreceiveddesignmedicalstudentsresidentsmajorityfelttopicsadequatelycoveredNeurologistsinternationaluncommonoutsidecapitalcityconcludedimportantmainbarriersincreasedparticipationidentifiedinsufficientmeagerdedicatedDistancelearningholdspromisemethodprovidingespeciallymaydifficultytravelinglargercitiesClinicalneurologists:baselineassessmentevidence-basedmedicineglobalhealthneurology

Similar Articles

Cited By