Attentional episodes in visual perception.

Brad Wyble, Mary C Potter, Howard Bowman, Mark Nieuwenstein
Author Information
  1. Brad Wyble: Department of Psychology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA. bwyble@gmail.com

Abstract

Is one's temporal perception of the world truly as seamless as it appears? This article presents a computationally motivated theory suggesting that visual attention samples information from temporal episodes (episodic simultaneous type/serial token model; Wyble, Bowman, & Nieuwenstein, 2009). Breaks between these episodes are punctuated by periods of suppressed attention, better known as the attentional blink (Raymond, Shapiro, & Arnell, 1992). We test predictions from this model and demonstrate that participants were able to report more letters from a sequence of 4 targets presented in a dense temporal cluster than from a sequence of 4 targets interleaved with nontargets. However, this superior report accuracy comes at a cost in impaired temporal order perception. Further experiments explore the dynamics of multiple episodes and the boundary conditions that trigger episodic breaks. Finally, we contrast the importance of attentional control, limited resources, and memory capacity constructs in the model.

References

  1. J Exp Psychol. 1951 Apr;41(4):310-6 [PMID: 14850647]
  2. J Gen Psychol. 1995 Jul;122(3):271-85 [PMID: 7650521]
  3. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Dec;31(6):1463-75 [PMID: 16366802]
  4. Mem Cognit. 1989 Mar;17(2):186-93 [PMID: 2927316]
  5. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005 Nov;58(8):1415-33 [PMID: 16365947]
  6. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Feb;35(1):159-69 [PMID: 19170478]
  7. Vision Res. 1989;29(11):1631-47 [PMID: 2635486]
  8. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Oct;28(5):1149-62 [PMID: 12421061]
  9. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989 May;15(2):287-303 [PMID: 2525600]
  10. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Aug;15(4):809-13 [PMID: 18792508]
  11. Psychol Rev. 1980 Jul;87(4):329-54 [PMID: 7413885]
  12. Psychol Rev. 2007 Jan;114(1):38-70 [PMID: 17227181]
  13. Cogn Psychol. 2009 Aug;59(1):1-29 [PMID: 19217086]
  14. Cogn Psychol. 2008 May;56(3):210-36 [PMID: 17624321]
  15. Psychol Rev. 1986 Apr;93(2):180-206 [PMID: 3714927]
  16. Psychol Res. 2005 Jan;69(3):191-200 [PMID: 15597184]
  17. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Jul;60(7):936-51 [PMID: 17616912]
  18. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Nov;18(4):1030-44 [PMID: 1431742]
  19. J Mem Lang. 2008 May;58(4):907-915 [PMID: 18568099]
  20. Psychol Sci. 2006 Jun;17(6):471-5 [PMID: 16771795]
  21. J Vis. 2009 Aug 31;9(9):18.1-14 [PMID: 19761351]
  22. Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Dec;9(4):739-43 [PMID: 12613677]
  23. Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Oct;13(5):886-90 [PMID: 17328390]
  24. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jul;30(4):815-26 [PMID: 15238026]
  25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 8;100(14):8520-5 [PMID: 12829797]
  26. Brain Res. 2008 Apr 2;1202:25-42 [PMID: 17662259]
  27. Percept Psychophys. 1987 Aug;42(2):105-13 [PMID: 3627930]
  28. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997 Jun;23(3):738-55 [PMID: 9180042]
  29. Mem Cognit. 2003 Dec;31(8):1198-207 [PMID: 15058681]
  30. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Apr;35(2):324-37 [PMID: 19331491]
  31. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1486-94 [PMID: 20695696]
  32. Trends Neurosci. 2000 Nov;23(11):571-9 [PMID: 11074267]
  33. Psychol Rev. 2005 Jan;112(1):3-42 [PMID: 15631586]
  34. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Jun;35(3):787-807 [PMID: 19485692]
  35. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Apr;37(2):396-408 [PMID: 20822301]
  36. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Sep;18(9):1423-38 [PMID: 16989545]
  37. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989 May;15(2):315-30 [PMID: 2525601]
  38. Science. 1987 Nov 6;238(4828):778-80 [PMID: 3672124]
  39. Cognition. 1987 Nov;27(2):117-43 [PMID: 3691023]
  40. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Nov;71(8):1683-700 [PMID: 19933555]
  41. Psychol Res. 2007 Mar;71(2):126-39 [PMID: 16341546]
  42. Psychol Res. 2006 May;70(3):200-17 [PMID: 15844005]
  43. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 May;34(6):947-57 [PMID: 20025902]
  44. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 Aug;134(3):291-307 [PMID: 16131265]
  45. Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6 [PMID: 9176952]
  46. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Dec;31(6):1476-92 [PMID: 16366803]
  47. Psychol Rev. 2008 Oct;115(4):836-63 [PMID: 18954206]
  48. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Aug;18(3):849-60 [PMID: 1500880]
  49. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005 Jul;119(3):305-14 [PMID: 15939028]
  50. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1998 Jul;24(4):979-92 [PMID: 9699304]
  51. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Apr;35(2):338-51 [PMID: 19331492]
  52. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2000 Nov;53(4):1061-80 [PMID: 11131813]
  53. Psychol Rev. 1997 Jan;104(1):148-69 [PMID: 9009883]
  54. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Feb;21(1):109-27 [PMID: 7707027]
  55. Conscious Cogn. 2008 Dec;17(4):1063-81 [PMID: 18948037]

Grants

  1. R01 MH047432/NIMH NIH HHS
  2. R01 MH047432-01A1/NIMH NIH HHS
  3. MH47432/NIMH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Attention
Attentional Blink
Computer Simulation
Humans
Memory, Short-Term
Models, Psychological
Photic Stimulation
Reaction Time
Visual Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0temporalepisodesperceptionmodelvisualattentionepisodic&attentionalreportsequence4targetsone'sworldtrulyseamlessappears?articlepresentscomputationallymotivatedtheorysuggestingsamplesinformationsimultaneoustype/serialtokenWybleBowmanNieuwenstein2009BreakspunctuatedperiodssuppressedbetterknownblinkRaymondShapiroArnell1992testpredictionsdemonstrateparticipantsableletterspresenteddenseclusterinterleavednontargetsHoweversuperioraccuracycomescostimpairedorderexperimentsexploredynamicsmultipleboundaryconditionstriggerbreaksFinallycontrastimportancecontrollimitedresourcesmemorycapacityconstructsAttentional

Similar Articles

Cited By (31)