Comparison of fine needle aspiration cytology and thyroid scan in solitary thyroid nodule.

Rabia Basharat, Mulazim Hussain Bukhari, Shahzad Saeed, Tahira Hamid
Author Information
  1. Rabia Basharat: Department of Pathology, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.

Abstract

Objective. This was a comparative study between FNAC and thyroid scan used to diagnose the solitary thyroid nodule and histopathology was used as gold standard to compare the results of both modalities. We hypothesized that Fine needle aspiration cytology and thyroid scan diagnose solitary thyroid nodule (STN) as accurately as histopathology. Materials and Methods. This study comprised of 50 patients with solitary thyroid nodules (STN) presented to OPD. After clinical examination these patients were referred to Centre for Nuclear Medicine, Mayo Hospital Lahore for thyroid function tests and thyroid scan (TS). These patients underwent FNAC in the department of Pathology and surgery in Mayo Hospital. The cases were operated and evaluated for histopathological changes. Results. On thyroid scan, 40 patients (80%) having cold nodule were labeled as suspicious 10 patients (20%) had hot nodule. On FNAC 23 patients (46%) had benign lesion, 22 patients (44%) had indeterminate lesion and 5 patients (10%) had malignant lesions. On histopathology, 45 patients (90%) were confirmed to have benign lesions and 5 patients (10%), malignant lesions. After comparison of results of thyroid scan and FNAC with histopathology, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of thyroid scan were 80%, 20%, 10%, 90% and 26%, respectively whereas those of FNAC were 80%, 97.7%, 80%, 97.7% and 96%, respectively. Conclusion. Fine needle aspiration was a significantly better predictor of malignancy than thyroid scan and resulted in a smaller proportion of excisions for benign nodules.

References

  1. Diagn Cytopathol. 2002 Jul;27(1):1-4 [PMID: 12112806]
  2. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994 Aug;79(2):335-9 [PMID: 8045944]
  3. J Laryngol Otol. 2006 Jun;120(6):467-9 [PMID: 16526971]
  4. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006 Mar;34(3):196-200 [PMID: 16470863]
  5. J Surg Oncol. 2002 Jul;80(3):157-70 [PMID: 12115799]
  6. Coll Antropol. 2010 Mar;34(1):197-200 [PMID: 20432751]
  7. South Med J. 2009 May;102(5):498-501 [PMID: 19373168]
  8. Cancer. 2000 Dec 25;90(6):325-9 [PMID: 11156514]
  9. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 1993;54(4):241-7 [PMID: 8092796]
  10. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Mar;132(3):244-50 [PMID: 16549743]
  11. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006 May;125(5):698-702 [PMID: 16707370]
  12. Acta Cytol. 2007 Nov-Dec;51(6):850-2 [PMID: 18077975]
  13. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Jun;93(6):2188-93 [PMID: 18381575]
  14. Head Neck Surg. 1981 Mar-Apr;3(4):297-322 [PMID: 6163751]
  15. Saudi Med J. 2004 Jul;25(7):866-70 [PMID: 15235690]
  16. Diagn Cytopathol. 2008 Feb;36(2):104-12 [PMID: 18181183]
  17. Anticancer Res. 2004 Jul-Aug;24(4):2531-4 [PMID: 15330209]
  18. Acta Cytol. 1995 Sep-Oct;39(5):898-904 [PMID: 7571967]
  19. Endocr Pathol. 2005 Winter;16(4):285-93 [PMID: 16627916]
  20. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 1997;58(6):463-8 [PMID: 9686005]
  21. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2005 Apr;48(2):166-9 [PMID: 16758655]
  22. Radiology. 2010 Jan;254(1):292-300 [PMID: 20019136]
  23. J Surg Oncol. 1995 Mar;58(3):168-72 [PMID: 7898112]
  24. Head Neck. 1989 Sep-Oct;11(5):414-25 [PMID: 2681067]
  25. Am J Med. 1995 Dec;99(6):642-50 [PMID: 7503088]
  26. Am Fam Physician. 2003 Feb 1;67(3):559-66 [PMID: 12588078]
  27. J Postgrad Med. 1993 Oct-Dec;39(4):202-4 [PMID: 7996497]
  28. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Feb 15;118(4):282-9 [PMID: 8420446]
  29. World J Surg. 1986 Aug;10(4):623-30 [PMID: 3751089]
  30. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000 May;82(3):149-55 [PMID: 10858674]
  31. Mod Pathol. 1996 Jun;9(6):710-5 [PMID: 8782212]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0thyroidpatientsscanFNACnodulesolitaryhistopathology80%needleaspirationbenign10%lesionsstudyuseddiagnoseresultsFinecytologySTNnodulesMayoHospital20%lesion5malignant90%predictivevaluerespectively977%ObjectivecomparativegoldstandardcomparemodalitieshypothesizedaccuratelyMaterialsMethodscomprised50presentedOPDclinicalexaminationreferredCentreNuclearMedicineLahorefunctiontestsTSunderwentdepartmentPathologysurgerycasesoperatedevaluatedhistopathologicalchangesResults40coldlabeledsuspicious10hot2346%2244%indeterminate45confirmedcomparisonsensitivityspecificitypositivenegativediagnosticaccuracy26%whereas96%ConclusionsignificantlybetterpredictormalignancyresultedsmallerproportionexcisionsComparisonfine

Similar Articles

Cited By