Development of tinnitus in CBA/CaJ mice following sound exposure.

Ryan J Longenecker, Alexander V Galazyuk
Author Information
  1. Ryan J Longenecker: Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, College of Medicine, Northeastern Ohio Universities, Rootstown, 44272, USA.

Abstract

Tinnitus, the perception of a sound without an external acoustic source, is a complex perceptual phenomenon affecting the quality of life in 17% of the adult population. Despite its ubiquity and morbidity, the pathophysiology of tinnitus is a work in progress, and there is no generally accepted cure or treatment. Development of a reliable common animal model is crucial for tinnitus research and may advance this field. The goal of this study was to develop a tinnitus mouse model. Tinnitus was induced in an experimental group of mice by an exposure to a loud (116 dB sound pressure level (SPL)) narrow band noise (one octave, centered at 16 kHz) during 1 h under anesthesia. The tinnitus was then assessed behaviorally by measuring gap induced suppression of the acoustic startle reflex. We found that a vast majority of the sound-exposed mice (86%) developed behavioral signs of tinnitus. This was a complex, long lasting, and dynamic process. On the day following exposure, all mice demonstrated signs of acute tinnitus over the entire range of sound frequencies used for testing (10-31 kHz). However, 2-3 months later, a behavioral evidence of tinnitus was evident only at a narrow frequency range (20-31 kHz) representing a presumed chronic condition. Extracellular recordings confirmed a significantly higher rate of spontaneous activity in inferior colliculus neurons in sound-exposed compared to control mice. Surprisingly, unilateral sound exposure suppresses startle responses in mice and they remained suppressed even 3 months post-exposure, whereas auditory brainstem response thresholds were completely recovered during 2 months following exposure. In summary, behavioral evidence of tinnitus can be reliably developed in mice by sound exposure, and tinnitus induction can be assessed by quantifying prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex.

References

  1. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Aug;112(2):740-7 [PMID: 12186053]
  2. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Oct;121(4):457-62 [PMID: 10504604]
  3. Hear Res. 2004 Apr;190(1-2):109-14 [PMID: 15051133]
  4. Audiology. 1992;31(3):168-79 [PMID: 1642568]
  5. Prog Brain Res. 2007;166:147-56 [PMID: 17956779]
  6. Hear Res. 2000 Mar;141(1-2):97-106 [PMID: 10713498]
  7. J Neurosci. 2009 Nov 11;29(45):14077-85 [PMID: 19906956]
  8. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2001 Mar;2(1):54-64 [PMID: 11545150]
  9. Hear Res. 2002 Aug;170(1-2):83-95 [PMID: 12208543]
  10. Hear Res. 1998 Mar;117(1-2):81-96 [PMID: 9557979]
  11. Neuroscience. 2009 Dec 1;164(2):747-59 [PMID: 19699270]
  12. Hear Res. 2003 Jun;180(1-2):39-50 [PMID: 12782351]
  13. Neurosci Lett. 2011 Apr 4;492(3):145-9 [PMID: 21300139]
  14. Behav Neurosci. 2005 Jun;119(3):734-42 [PMID: 15998194]
  15. Nature. 2011 Feb 3;470(7332):101-4 [PMID: 21228773]
  16. Laryngoscope. 2005 Nov;115(11):1996-9 [PMID: 16319612]
  17. J Neurophysiol. 2007 Aug;98(2):744-56 [PMID: 17581852]
  18. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2003 Sep;4(3):339-52 [PMID: 14690052]
  19. Neuroscience. 2009 Dec 1;164(2):733-46 [PMID: 19699277]
  20. J Neurosci. 2003 May 1;23(9):3944-52 [PMID: 12736364]
  21. J Neurosci. 2010 Jul 14;30(28):9578-87 [PMID: 20631186]
  22. Drugs Aging. 2004;21(5):297-305 [PMID: 15040757]
  23. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2003 Sep;4(3):353-62 [PMID: 14690053]
  24. Hear Res. 2007 Apr;226(1-2):244-53 [PMID: 16904853]
  25. Audiol Neurootol. 2003 May-Jun;8(3):129-39 [PMID: 12679624]
  26. J Neurosci. 2010 Nov 10;30(45):14972-9 [PMID: 21068300]
  27. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jun;104(6):1404-8, table of contents [PMID: 17513632]
  28. Neuroscience. 2009 Aug 18;162(2):486-500 [PMID: 19401221]
  29. Hear Res. 2000 Feb;140(1-2):165-72 [PMID: 10675644]
  30. Behav Neurosci. 2006 Feb;120(1):188-95 [PMID: 16492129]
  31. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2004 Dec 20;132(2):192-207 [PMID: 15582158]
  32. Hear Res. 2001 May;155(1-2):82-90 [PMID: 11335078]
  33. Neuroscience. 2010 Jun 2;167(4):1216-26 [PMID: 20206235]
  34. Eur J Neurosci. 2010 May;31(9):1616-28 [PMID: 20525074]
  35. Hear Res. 2000 Sep;147(1-2):282-92 [PMID: 10962192]
  36. J Neurosci. 2002 Mar 15;22(6):2383-90 [PMID: 11896177]

MeSH Term

Animals
Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem
Mice
Mice, Inbred CBA
Noise
Reflex
Reflex, Startle
Tinnitus

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0tinnitusmicesoundexposureacoustickHzstartlebehavioralfollowingmonthsTinnituscomplexDevelopmentmodelinducednarrowassessedreflexsound-exposeddevelopedsignsrangeevidencecanperceptionwithoutexternalsourceperceptualphenomenonaffectingqualitylife17%adultpopulationDespiteubiquitymorbiditypathophysiologyworkprogressgenerallyacceptedcuretreatmentreliablecommonanimalcrucialresearchmayadvancefieldgoalstudydevelopmouseexperimentalgrouploud116dBpressurelevelSPLbandnoiseoneoctavecentered161hanesthesiabehaviorallymeasuringgapsuppressionfoundvastmajority86%longlastingdynamicprocessdaydemonstratedacuteentirefrequenciesusedtesting10-31However2-3laterevidentfrequency20-31representingpresumedchronicconditionExtracellularrecordingsconfirmedsignificantlyhigherratespontaneousactivityinferiorcolliculusneuronscomparedcontrolSurprisinglyunilateralsuppressesresponsesremainedsuppressedeven3post-exposurewhereasauditorybrainstemresponsethresholdscompletelyrecovered2summaryreliablyinductionquantifyingprepulseinhibitionCBA/CaJ

Similar Articles

Cited By