Older emergency department drivers: patterns, behaviors, and willingness to enroll in a safe driver program.

Kirk A Stiffler, Scott T Wilber
Author Information
  1. Kirk A Stiffler: Summa Health System/Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the reported driving patterns of older emergency department (ED) drivers and the factors that might lead them to enroll in a safe driving program.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional survey of a convenience sample of ED patients 65-years-old and up regarding their driving patterns, behaviors and willingness to enroll in a safe driving program.
RESULTS: We surveyed 138 patients. Most (73%) reported driving within the last year, and 88% of these believe they could not manage without driving. Eleven percent of ED older drivers have been in a motor vehicle crash (MVC) in the past year (95% CI 6-20%), compared to 2.5% of all seniors. Our survey findings suggest that 88% of older ED drivers avoid at least some high-risk driving situations and 65% are unwilling to enroll in a safe driver program unless it lowers their automobile insurance rates. At the same time, most older ED drivers underestimate their risk of being involved in (75%) or dying from (74%) a MVC.
CONCLUSION: Overall, there are a significant number of older people for whom driving remains a vital yet risky daily function. Most of these drivers have little interest in information regarding safe driving programs while in the ED. Those willing to learn about such programs would prefer to take home the information regarding the program rather than have any staff member discuss it while in the ED.

References

  1. JAMA. 2004 Jun 16;291(23):2840-6 [PMID: 15199034]
  2. Can Fam Physician. 2005 Mar;51:372-9 [PMID: 15794022]
  3. Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Sep 1;152(5):424-31 [PMID: 10981455]
  4. Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Mar;8(3):267-73 [PMID: 11229949]
  5. Psychol Aging. 1991 Sep;6(3):403-15 [PMID: 1930757]
  6. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2006 Nov;24(4):849-69 [PMID: 16982343]
  7. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Jun;55(6):878-84 [PMID: 17537088]
  8. Accid Anal Prev. 2003 Sep;35(5):805-10 [PMID: 12850082]
  9. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003 Sep;58(9):M826-31 [PMID: 14528039]
  10. Accid Anal Prev. 1998 May;30(3):313-22 [PMID: 9663290]
  11. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Oct 13;163(18):2129-31; discussion 2131 [PMID: 14557207]
  12. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Oct;51(10):1348-55 [PMID: 14511153]
  13. Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Feb;10(2):155-60 [PMID: 12574014]
  14. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Oct 13;163(18):2126-8; discussion 2132 [PMID: 14557206]
  15. Inj Prev. 2004 Feb;10(1):27-32 [PMID: 14760023]
  16. Accid Anal Prev. 2003 Mar;35(2):227-35 [PMID: 12504143]
  17. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Nov;39(11):1132-6 [PMID: 1753055]
  18. Accid Anal Prev. 2001 May;33(3):413-21 [PMID: 11235803]
  19. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007 Oct;62(10):1113-9 [PMID: 17921424]
  20. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2003;47:181-94 [PMID: 12941225]
  21. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004 Jan-Feb;17(1):38-43 [PMID: 15014051]
  22. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Oct;51(10):1484-9 [PMID: 14511173]
  23. Accid Anal Prev. 2000 Nov;32(6):751-9 [PMID: 10994602]
  24. Gerontologist. 2004 Apr;44(2):237-44 [PMID: 15075420]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0drivingEDolderdriverssafeprogramenrollpatternsregardingreportedemergencydepartmentsurveypatientsbehaviorswillingnessyear88%MVCdriverinformationprogramsOBJECTIVE:objectiveassessfactorsmightleadMETHODS:conductedprospectivecross-sectionalconveniencesample65-years-oldRESULTS:surveyed13873%withinlastbelievemanagewithoutElevenpercentmotorvehiclecrashpast95%CI6-20%compared25%seniorsfindingssuggestavoidleasthigh-risksituations65%unwillingunlesslowersautomobileinsuranceratestimeunderestimateriskinvolved75%dying74%CONCLUSION:OverallsignificantnumberpeopleremainsvitalyetriskydailyfunctionlittleinterestwillinglearnprefertakehomeratherstaffmemberdiscussOlderdrivers:

Similar Articles

Cited By