A connection between the Efferent Auditory System and Noise-Induced Tinnitus Generation. Reduced contralateral suppression of TEOAEs in patients with noise-induced tinnitus.

Panagiota Lalaki, Stavros Hatzopoulos, Guiscardo Lorito, Krzysztof Kochanek, Lech Sliwa, Henryk Skarzynski
Author Information
  1. Panagiota Lalaki: Audiology - Neurotology Department., ENT Clinic, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Subjective tinnitus is an auditory perception that is not caused by external stimulation, its source being anywhere in the auditory system. Furthermore, evidence exists that exposure to noise alters cochlear micromechanics, either directly or through complex feed-back mechanisms, involving the medial olivocochlear efferent system. The aim of this study was to assess the role of the efferent auditory system in noise-induced tinnitus generation.
MATERIAL/METHODS: Contralateral sound-activated suppression of TEOAEs was performed in a group of 28 subjects with noise-induced tinnitus (NIT) versus a group of 35 subjects with normal hearing and tinnitus, without any history of exposure to intense occupational or recreational noise (idiopathic tinnitus-IT). Thirty healthy, normally hearing volunteers were used as controls for the efferent suppression test.
RESULTS: Suppression of the TEOAE amplitude less than 1 dB SPL was considered abnormal, giving a false positive rate of 6.7%. Eighteen out of 28 (64.3%) patients of the NIT group and 9 out of 35 (25.7%) patients of the IT group showed abnormal suppression values, which were significantly different from the controls' (p<0.0001 and p<0.045, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The abnormal activity of the efferent auditory system in NIT cases might indicate that either the activity of the efferent fibers innervating the outer hair cells (OHCs) is impaired or that the damaged OHCs themselves respond abnormally to the efferent stimulation.

References

  1. Hear Res. 1993 Feb;65(1-2):193-210 [PMID: 8458751]
  2. Hear Res. 1993 Dec;71(1-2):106-13 [PMID: 8113129]
  3. J Comp Neurol. 1946 Apr;84:141-219 [PMID: 20982804]
  4. Science. 1982 Jun 18;216(4552):1331-4 [PMID: 7079767]
  5. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1995;40:1-147 [PMID: 7732328]
  6. Hear Res. 2002 Jul;169(1-2):169-78 [PMID: 12121749]
  7. Hear Res. 1987;26(1):45-64 [PMID: 3558143]
  8. J Am Acad Audiol. 2001 Feb;12(2):80-5 [PMID: 11261461]
  9. Hear Res. 1994 Jun 15;77(1-2):1-8 [PMID: 7928721]
  10. Hear Res. 1995 May;85(1-2):142-54 [PMID: 7559170]
  11. Otol Neurotol. 2011 Feb;32(2):315-21 [PMID: 20962699]
  12. Br J Audiol. 1994 Aug-Oct;28(4-5):247-54 [PMID: 7735153]
  13. Br J Audiol. 1994 Aug-Oct;28(4-5):235-45 [PMID: 7735152]
  14. J Acoust Soc Am. 1979 Sep;66(3):721-7 [PMID: 489843]
  15. Br J Audiol. 1994 Feb;28(1):13-25 [PMID: 7987268]
  16. J Neurophysiol. 1991 Mar;65(3):724-35 [PMID: 2051201]
  17. Audiology. 1992;31(1):1-7 [PMID: 1554329]
  18. Acta Otolaryngol. 1996 Jul;116(4):534-9 [PMID: 8831838]
  19. Am J Otol. 1993 May;14(3):252-8 [PMID: 8372922]
  20. Audiol Neurootol. 1998 Sep-Oct;3(5):332-44 [PMID: 9705528]
  21. Acta Otolaryngol. 1993 May;113(3):285-90 [PMID: 8517129]
  22. J Speech Hear Res. 1983 Dec;26(4):629-32 [PMID: 6668950]
  23. Noise Health. 2001;3(12):61-73 [PMID: 12678941]
  24. Am J Otolaryngol. 2010 May-Jun;31(3):181-4 [PMID: 20015738]
  25. Brain Res. 1979 Sep 7;173(1):152-5 [PMID: 487078]
  26. Ciba Found Symp. 1981;85:54-81 [PMID: 7035100]
  27. Int J Audiol. 2003 Sep;42(6):339-47 [PMID: 14570242]
  28. Otol Neurotol. 2004 Mar;25(2):178-82 [PMID: 15021780]
  29. J Acoust Soc Am. 1985 Sep;78(3):833-60 [PMID: 4040933]
  30. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990 Apr;116(4):418-23 [PMID: 2317322]
  31. Audiol Neurootol. 2002 Nov-Dec;7(6):348-57 [PMID: 12401966]
  32. Neurosci Res. 1990 Aug;8(4):221-54 [PMID: 2175858]
  33. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998 Oct;65(4):523-9 [PMID: 9771778]
  34. Audiology. 2001 Nov-Dec;40(6):308-12 [PMID: 11781043]
  35. Hear Res. 1990 Jan;43(2-3):251-61 [PMID: 2312416]
  36. Scand Audiol. 1993;22(3):197-203 [PMID: 8210961]
  37. Scand Audiol. 1996;25(3):167-72 [PMID: 8881004]
  38. Br J Audiol. 1991 Dec;25(6):391-7 [PMID: 1773199]

MeSH Term

Acoustic Impedance Tests
Acoustic Stimulation
Adult
Analysis of Variance
Cochlea
Efferent Pathways
Female
Hearing
Humans
Male
Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous
Tinnitus

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0efferenttinnitusauditorysystemsuppressiongroupnoise-inducedNITabnormalpatientsstimulationexposurenoiseeitherTEOAEs28subjects35hearing7%p<0activityOHCsBACKGROUND:SubjectiveperceptioncausedexternalsourceanywhereFurthermoreevidenceexistsalterscochlearmicromechanicsdirectlycomplexfeed-backmechanismsinvolvingmedialolivocochlearaimstudyassessrolegenerationMATERIAL/METHODS:Contralateralsound-activatedperformedversusnormalwithouthistoryintenseoccupationalrecreationalidiopathictinnitus-ITThirtyhealthynormallyvolunteersusedcontrolstestRESULTS:SuppressionTEOAEamplitudeless1dBSPLconsideredgivingfalsepositiverate6Eighteen643%925ITshowedvaluessignificantlydifferentcontrols'0001045respectivelyCONCLUSIONS:casesmightindicatefibersinnervatingouterhaircellsimpaireddamagedrespondabnormallyconnectionEfferentAuditorySystemNoise-InducedTinnitusGenerationReducedcontralateral

Similar Articles

Cited By