Social learning spreads knowledge about dangerous humans among American crows.

Heather N Cornell, John M Marzluff, Shannon Pecoraro
Author Information
  1. Heather N Cornell: School of Forest Resources, College of the Environment, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Abstract

Individuals face evolutionary trade-offs between the acquisition of costly but accurate information gained firsthand and the use of inexpensive but possibly less reliable social information. American crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos) use both sources of information to learn the facial features of a dangerous person. We exposed wild crows to a novel 'dangerous face' by wearing a unique mask as we trapped, banded and released 7-15 birds at five study sites near Seattle, WA, USA. An immediate scolding response to the dangerous mask after trapping by previously captured crows demonstrates individual learning, while an immediate response by crows that were not captured probably represents conditioning to the trapping scene by the mob of birds that assembled during the capture. Later recognition of dangerous masks by lone crows that were never captured is consistent with horizontal social learning. Independent scolding by young crows, whose parents had conditioned them to scold the dangerous mask, demonstrates vertical social learning. Crows that directly experienced trapping later discriminated among dangerous and neutral masks more precisely than did crows that learned through social means. Learning enabled scolding to double in frequency and spread at least 1.2 km from the place of origin over a 5 year period at one site.

References

  1. Anim Behav. 1998 Feb;55(2):313-8 [PMID: 9480699]
  2. Nat Neurosci. 2007 Sep;10(9):1095-102 [PMID: 17726475]
  3. AJS. 2004 May;109(6):1500-6 [PMID: 15307257]
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 2;106(22):8959-62 [PMID: 19451622]
  5. Science. 1978 Nov 24;202(4370):899-901 [PMID: 17752463]
  6. Anim Cogn. 2006 Oct;9(4):335-53 [PMID: 17024510]
  7. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1994 May;69(2):207-31 [PMID: 8054445]
  8. Science. 2004 Jul 23;305(5683):487-91 [PMID: 15273386]
  9. J Theor Biol. 2010 Apr 21;263(4):544-55 [PMID: 20064530]
  10. Learn Behav. 2004 Feb;32(1):131-40 [PMID: 15161148]
  11. Curr Biol. 2005 Jul 12;15(13):R498-500 [PMID: 16005280]
  12. Curr Biol. 2008 May 6;18(9):R366-70 [PMID: 18460312]
  13. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006 Apr;129(4):601-8 [PMID: 16342257]
  14. Curr Biol. 2007 Aug 21;17(16):R652-6 [PMID: 17714658]
  15. Behav Processes. 1995 May;34(1):43-53 [PMID: 24897247]
  16. Brain Res Bull. 2008 Jun 15;76(3):264-71 [PMID: 18498939]
  17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jul 6;101(27):10235-40 [PMID: 15218098]

MeSH Term

Animals
Crows
Face
Humans
Learning
Seasons
Social Behavior
Visual Perception
Washington

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0crowsdangeroussociallearninginformationmaskscoldingtrappingcaptureduseAmericanbirdsimmediateresponsedemonstratesmasksamongIndividualsfaceevolutionarytrade-offsacquisitioncostlyaccurategainedfirsthandinexpensivepossiblylessreliableCorvusbrachyrhynchossourceslearnfacialfeaturespersonexposedwildnovel'dangerousface'wearinguniquetrappedbandedreleased7-15fivestudysitesnearSeattleWAUSApreviouslyindividualprobablyrepresentsconditioningscenemobassembledcaptureLaterrecognitionloneneverconsistenthorizontalIndependentyoungwhoseparentsconditionedscoldverticalCrowsdirectlyexperiencedlaterdiscriminatedneutralpreciselylearnedmeansLearningenableddoublefrequencyspreadleast12kmplaceorigin5yearperiodonesiteSocialspreadsknowledgehumans

Similar Articles

Cited By