The effect of real-time continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Nicole M Ehrhardt, Mary Chellappa, M Susan Walker, Stephanie J Fonda, Robert A Vigersky
Author Information
  1. Nicole M Ehrhardt: Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington DC, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) improves hemoglobin A1c (A1C) and hypoglycemia in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus and those with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on prandial insulin; however, it has not been tested in people with T2DM not taking prandial insulin. We evaluated the utility of RT-CGM in people with T2DM on a variety of treatment modalities except prandial insulin.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective, 52-week, two-arm, randomized trial comparing RT-CGM (n = 50) versus self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) (n = 50) in people with T2DM not taking prandial insulin. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring was used for four 2-week cycles (2 weeks on/1 week off). All patients were managed by their usual provider. This article reports on changes in A1C 0-12 weeks.
RESULTS: Mean (± standard deviation) decline in A1C at 12 weeks was 1.0% (± 1.1%) in the RT-CGM group and 0.5% (± 0.8%) in the SMBG group (p = .006). There were no group differences in the net change in number or dosage of hypoglycemic medications. Those who used the RT-CGM for ≥ 48 days (per protocol) reduced their A1C by 1.2% (± 1.1%) versus 0.6% (± 1.1%) in those who used it <48 days (p = .003). Multiple regression analyses statistically adjusting for baseline A1C, an indicator for usage, and known confounders confirmed the observed differences between treatment groups were robust (p = .009). There was no improvement in weight or blood pressure.
CONCLUSIONS: Real-time continuous glucose monitoring significantly improves A1C compared with SMBG in patients with T2DM not taking prandial insulin. This technology might benefit a wider population of people with diabetes than previously thought.

References

  1. Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):837-53 [PMID: 9742976]
  2. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Jul 01;4(4):942-8 [PMID: 20663460]
  3. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007 Dec;9(6):483-92 [PMID: 18034602]
  4. Diabetologia. 2009 Jul;52(7):1250-7 [PMID: 19396424]
  5. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33 Suppl 1:S11-61 [PMID: 20042772]
  6. Diabetes Care. 2006 Dec;29(12):2730-2 [PMID: 17130215]
  7. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008 Nov;2(6):1030-53 [PMID: 19885292]
  8. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007 Jun;9(3):203-10 [PMID: 17561790]
  9. Am J Manag Care. 2008 Jul;14(7):468-75 [PMID: 18611098]
  10. N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 30;329(14):977-86 [PMID: 8366922]
  11. Diabetes Care. 2003 Apr;26(4):1153-7 [PMID: 12663589]
  12. Clin Chem. 2011 Feb;57(2):205-14 [PMID: 21148304]
  13. Diabetes Care. 2011 Feb;34(2):262-7 [PMID: 21270183]
  14. BMJ. 2008 May 24;336(7654):1174-7 [PMID: 18420662]
  15. Diabetes Care. 2006 Jan;29(1):44-50 [PMID: 16373894]
  16. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 2;359(14):1464-76 [PMID: 18779236]
  17. Diabetes Care. 2005 Jun;28(6):1510-7 [PMID: 15920083]
  18. Am J Med. 2005 Apr;118(4):422-5 [PMID: 15808142]
  19. BMJ. 2007 Jul 21;335(7611):132 [PMID: 17591623]
  20. Diabetes Care. 2009 Aug;32(8):1378-83 [PMID: 19429875]
  21. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Dec;11(12):775-84 [PMID: 20001678]
  22. BMJ. 2000 Aug 12;321(7258):405-12 [PMID: 10938048]
  23. Diabetes. 1994 Feb;43(2):313-7 [PMID: 8288056]

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Blood Glucose
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Female
Glycated Hemoglobin
Humans
Hypoglycemia
Insulin
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Regression Analysis
Treatment Outcome

Chemicals

Blood Glucose
Glycated Hemoglobin A
Insulin
hemoglobin A1c protein, human

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0A1C1glucoseRT-CGMpeopleT2DMprandialinsulin=±continuousmonitoringdiabetesReal-timetypemellitus2takingSMBGusedweekspatients1%group0pimprovestreatmentn50versusblooddifferencesdaysBACKGROUND:hemoglobinA1chypoglycemiahowevertestedevaluatedutilityvarietymodalitiesexceptMETHODS:conductedprospective52-weektwo-armrandomizedtrialcomparingself-monitoringfour2-weekcycleson/1weekmanagedusualproviderarticlereportschanges0-12RESULTS:Meanstandarddeviationdecline120%5%8%006netchangenumberdosagehypoglycemicmedications48perprotocolreduced2%6%<48003Multipleregressionanalysesstatisticallyadjustingbaselineindicatorusageknownconfoundersconfirmedobservedgroupsrobust009improvementweightpressureCONCLUSIONS:significantlycomparedtechnologymightbenefitwiderpopulationpreviouslythoughteffectreal-timeglycemiccontrol

Similar Articles

Cited By