Rapid concentration and molecular enrichment approach for sensitive detection of Escherichia coli and Shigella species in potable water samples.

Andrée F Maheux, Luc Bissonnette, Maurice Boissinot, Jean-Luc T Bernier, Vicky Huppé, François J Picard, Éve Bérubé, Michel G Bergeron
Author Information
  1. Andrée F Maheux: Centre de Recherche en Infectiologie de l'Université Laval, Centre de Recherche du CHUQ, 2705 Laurier Blvd., Québec City, Québec, Canada.

Abstract

In this work, we used a rapid, simple, and efficient concentration-and-recovery procedure combined with a DNA enrichment method (dubbed CRENAME [concentration and recovery of microbial particles, extraction of nucleic acids, and molecular enrichment]), that we coupled to an Escherichia coli/Shigella-specific real-time PCR (rtPCR) assay targeting the tuf gene, to sensitively detect E. coli/Shigella in water. This integrated method was compared to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) culture-based Method 1604 on MI agar in terms of analytical specificity, ubiquity, detection limit, and rapidity. None of the 179 non-E. coli/Shigella strains tested was detected by both methods, with the exception of Escherichia fergusonii, which was detected by the CRENAME procedure combined with the E. coli/Shigella-specific rtPCR assay (CRENAME + E. coli rtPCR). DNA from all 90 E. coli/Shigella strains tested was amplified by the CRENAME + E. coli rtPCR, whereas the MI agar method had limited ubiquity and detected only 65 (72.2%) of the 90 strains tested. In less than 5 h, the CRENAME + E. coli rtPCR method detected 1.8 E. coli/Shigella CFU whereas the MI agar method detected 1.2 CFU/100 ml of water in 24 h (95% confidence). Consequently, the CRENAME method provides an easy and efficient approach to detect as little as one Gram-negative E. coli/Shigella cell present in a 100-ml potable water sample. Coupled with an E. coli/Shigella-specific rtPCR assay, the entire molecular procedure is comparable to U.S. EPA Method 1604 on MI agar in terms of analytical specificity and detection limit but provides significant advantages in terms of speed and ubiquity.

References

  1. Symp Ser Soc Appl Microbiol. 2000;(29):106S-116S [PMID: 10880185]
  2. J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Mar;47(3):751-7 [PMID: 19144808]
  3. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Oct;75(20):6534-44 [PMID: 19700542]
  4. J Microbiol Methods. 2003 Jan;52(1):123-31 [PMID: 12401234]
  5. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Apr;57(4):1013-7 [PMID: 2059028]
  6. J Water Health. 2006 Dec;4(4):487-98 [PMID: 17176819]
  7. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Jan;21(1):77-81 [PMID: 3968204]
  8. Clin Chem. 2009 Apr;55(4):611-22 [PMID: 19246619]
  9. J Bacteriol. 1972 Mar;109(3):953-65 [PMID: 4551757]
  10. J Gen Microbiol. 1991 Aug;137(8):1911-21 [PMID: 1955870]
  11. J Public Health Policy. 1996;17(4):389-408 [PMID: 9009536]
  12. ISME J. 2008 Mar;2(3):233-41 [PMID: 18256705]
  13. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1990 Nov;60(3):315-22 [PMID: 1982103]
  14. Trends Biotechnol. 2003 Dec;21(12):531-5 [PMID: 14624861]
  15. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Jun;43(6):1320-9 [PMID: 7049088]
  16. Water Res. 2009 Jul;43(12):3019-28 [PMID: 19482328]
  17. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005 Sep;55(Pt 5):2013-2025 [PMID: 16166704]
  18. J Water Health. 2007;5 Suppl 1:131-49 [PMID: 17890842]
  19. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Jan;21(1):46-9 [PMID: 4924998]
  20. Water Res. 2010 Aug;44(15):4325-39 [PMID: 20619868]
  21. Water Res. 2001 Jun;35(9):2207-18 [PMID: 11358300]
  22. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1994 Jul;19(1):44-6 [PMID: 7765219]
  23. Water Res. 2011 Mar;45(6):2342-54 [PMID: 21333318]
  24. J Food Prot. 1991 Apr;54(4):249-255 [PMID: 31051629]
  25. Anal Biochem. 2002 Apr 15;303(2):186-93 [PMID: 11950218]
  26. Hum Mutat. 2006 Jul;27(7):603-14 [PMID: 16786504]

Grants

  1. PA-15586/Canadian Institutes of Health Research

MeSH Term

Bacteriological Techniques
Escherichia coli
Peptide Elongation Factor Tu
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Sensitivity and Specificity
Shigella
Time Factors
Water Microbiology

Chemicals

Peptide Elongation Factor Tu

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0EmethodCRENAMErtPCRcoli/ShigelladetectedwaterMIagarcoliproceduremolecularEscherichiacoli/Shigella-specificassaytermsubiquitydetectionstrainstested+efficientcombinedDNAenrichmentdetectUSEPAMethod1604analyticalspecificitylimit90whereash1providesapproachpotableworkusedrapidsimpleconcentration-and-recoverydubbed[concentrationrecoverymicrobialparticlesextractionnucleicacidsenrichment]coupledreal-timePCRtargetingtufgenesensitivelyintegratedcomparedEnvironmentalProtectionAgencyculture-basedrapidityNone179non-Emethodsexceptionfergusoniiamplifiedlimited65722%less58CFU2CFU/100ml2495%confidenceConsequentlyeasylittleoneGram-negativecellpresent100-mlsampleCoupledentirecomparablesignificantadvantagesspeedRapidconcentrationsensitiveShigellaspeciessamples

Similar Articles

Cited By (16)