A computerized pneumococcal vaccination reminder system in the adult emergency department.

Judith W Dexheimer, Thomas R Talbot, Fei Ye, Yu Shyr, Ian Jones, William M Gregg, Dominik Aronsky
Author Information
  1. Judith W Dexheimer: Division of Biomedical Informatics, Eskind Biomedical Library, Vanderbilt University, 2209 Garland Avenue, Nashville, TN 37232-8340, USA. Judith.Dexheimer@cchmc.org

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pneumococcal vaccination is an effective strategy to prevent invasive pneumococcal disease in the elderly. Emergency department (ED) visits present an underutilized opportunity to increase vaccination rates; however, designing a sustainable vaccination program in an ED is challenging. We examined whether an information technology supported approach would provide a feasible and sustainable method to increase vaccination rates in an adult ED.
METHODS: During a 1-year period we prospectively evaluated a team-oriented, workflow-embedded reminder system that integrated four different information systems. The computerized triage application screened all patients 65 years and older for pneumococcal vaccine eligibility with information from the electronic patient record. For eligible patients the computerized provider order entry system reminded clinicians to place a vaccination order, which was passed to the order tracking application. Documentation of vaccine administration was then added to the longitudinal electronic patient record. The primary outcome was the vaccine administration rate in the ED. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals, representing the overall relative risks of ED workload related variables associated with vaccination rate.
RESULTS: Among 3371 patients 65 years old and older screened at triage 1309 (38.8%) were up-to-date with pneumococcal vaccination and 2062 (61.2%) were eligible for vaccination. Of the eligible patients, 621 (30.1%) consented to receive the vaccination during their ED visit. Physicians received prompts for 428 (68.9%) patients. When prompted, physicians declined to order the vaccine in 192 (30.9%) patients, while 222 (10.8%) of eligible patients actually received the vaccine. The computerized reminder system increased vaccination rate from a baseline of 38.8% to 45.4%. Vaccination during the ED visit was associated younger age (OR: 0.972, CI: 0.953-0.991), Caucasian race (OR: 0.329, CI: 0.241-0.448), and longer ED boarding times (OR: 1.039, CI: 1.013-1.065).
CONCLUSION: The integrated informatics solution seems to be a feasible and sustainable model to increase vaccination rates in a challenging ED environment.

References

  1. JAMA. 2004 Nov 17;292(19):2366-71 [PMID: 15547164]
  2. Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Jun;12(6):497-501 [PMID: 15930399]
  3. Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Jan;11(1):38-50 [PMID: 14709427]
  4. N Engl J Med. 2001 Sep 27;345(13):965-70 [PMID: 11575289]
  5. Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Mar;33(3):299-303 [PMID: 10036344]
  6. J Biomed Inform. 2005 Dec;38(6):469-85 [PMID: 16290243]
  7. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;:1065 [PMID: 14728568]
  8. Ann Emerg Med. 1993 Nov;22(11):1729-32 [PMID: 8214864]
  9. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;:1005 [PMID: 17238624]
  10. J Emerg Nurs. 2005 Feb;31(1):39-50; quiz 118 [PMID: 15682128]
  11. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;:201-5 [PMID: 16779030]
  12. Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Aug;42(2):173-80 [PMID: 12883504]
  13. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Mar-Apr;15(2):184-94 [PMID: 18096913]
  14. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Sep 23;162(17):1961-5 [PMID: 12230418]
  15. Vaccine. 2005 Jan 11;23(8):1048-52 [PMID: 15620478]
  16. Am J Med Qual. 2006 Mar-Apr;21(2):125-33 [PMID: 16533904]
  17. MMWR Recomm Rep. 1997 Apr 4;46(RR-8):1-24 [PMID: 9132580]
  18. J Gen Intern Med. 1994 Aug;9(8):425-9 [PMID: 7965235]
  19. Med Care. 1997 Sep;35(9):921-31 [PMID: 9298081]
  20. Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Nov;32(5):537-43 [PMID: 9795315]
  21. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003 Jan 31;52(4):68-9 [PMID: 12578325]
  22. Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Dec;13(12):1312-8 [PMID: 17101730]
  23. BMC Public Health. 2005 Oct 14;5:110 [PMID: 16225683]
  24. Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Oct;40(4):388-93 [PMID: 12239493]
  25. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003 Oct 17;52(41):987-92 [PMID: 14561957]
  26. Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):635-41 [PMID: 12660210]
  27. Arch Intern Med. 1993 Jul 12;153(13):1573-7 [PMID: 8323420]
  28. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2005 Jan;13(1):18-23 [PMID: 15649683]
  29. Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Jul;6(7):724-7 [PMID: 10433533]
  30. Vaccine. 1998 Nov;16(19):1795-802 [PMID: 9795383]
  31. JAMA. 1997 Oct 22-29;278(16):1333-9 [PMID: 9343464]

Grants

  1. T15 LM007450/NLM NIH HHS
  2. T15 LM007450-03/NLM NIH HHS
  3. LM T15 007450-03/NLM NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Aged
Computer Systems
Emergency Service, Hospital
Female
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Medical Records Systems, Computerized
Multivariate Analysis
Physicians
Pneumococcal Infections
Pneumococcal Vaccines
Prospective Studies
Reminder Systems
Vaccination

Chemicals

Pneumococcal Vaccines