Comparison of two treatments for coxarthrosis: local hyperthermia versus radio electric asymmetrical brain stimulation.

Alessandro Castagna, Salvatore Rinaldi, Vania Fontani, Piero Mannu, Matteo Lotti Margotti
Author Information
  1. Alessandro Castagna: Rinaldi Fontani Institute, Department of Neuro Psycho Physio Pathology, Florence, Italy.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is well known that psychological components are very important in the aging process and may also manifest in psychogenic movement disorders, such as coxarthrosis. This study analyzed the medical records of two similar groups of patients with coxarthrosis (n = 15 in each) who were treated in two different clinics for rehabilitation therapy.
METHODS: Patients in Group A were treated with a course of traditional physiotherapy, including sessions of local hyperthermia. Group B patients were treated with only a course of radioelectric asymmetrical brain stimulation (REAC) to improve their motor behavior.
RESULTS: Group A showed a significant decrease in symptoms of pain and stiffness, and an insignificant improvement in range of motion and muscle bulk. A single patient in this group developed worsened symptoms, and pain did not resolve completely in any patient. The patients in Group B had significantly decreased levels of pain and stiffness, and a significant improvement in range of motion and muscle bulk. No patients worsened in Group B, and the pain resolved completely in one patient.
CONCLUSION: Both treatments were shown to be tolerable and safe. Patients who underwent REAC treatment appeared to have slightly better outcomes, with an appreciable improvement in both their physical and mental states. These aspects are particularly important in the elderly, in whom functional limitation is often associated with or exacerbated by a psychogenic component.

Keywords

References

  1. J Rheumatol. 1998 Jan;25(1):125-33 [PMID: 9458215]
  2. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996 Jul;150(7):740-7 [PMID: 8673201]
  3. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2000 Jul-Aug;138(4):369-72 [PMID: 11033908]
  4. Lancet Neurol. 2006 Aug;5(8):708-12 [PMID: 16857577]
  5. Radiologe. 2009 May;49(5):400-9 [PMID: 19452186]
  6. Indian J Med Res. 2008 Sep;128(3):254-61 [PMID: 19052335]
  7. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2007 Jul;3(7):383-93 [PMID: 17611487]
  8. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2006 Jul;6(4):269-71 [PMID: 16822346]
  9. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 1989;54(1):63-6 [PMID: 2776507]
  10. Acupunct Electrother Res. 2010;35(1-2):1-16 [PMID: 20578643]
  11. Z Psychosom Med Psychoanal. 1996;42(2):107-27 [PMID: 8711955]
  12. CNS Drugs. 2004;18(7):437-52 [PMID: 15139799]
  13. Neuroimage. 2009 Sep;47(3):911-3 [PMID: 19501171]
  14. Cortex. 2010 Jul-Aug;46(7):845-57 [PMID: 19665115]
  15. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Mar 20;8:31 [PMID: 20302662]
  16. Neuroimage. 2009 Sep;47(3):1015-25 [PMID: 19426818]
  17. J Behav Med. 1992 Apr;15(2):189-214 [PMID: 1533877]
  18. Front Aging Neurosci. 2010 Dec 01;2:149 [PMID: 21151809]
  19. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:373-9 [PMID: 21822388]
  20. J Gen Intern Med. 2007 May;22(5):685-91 [PMID: 17443380]
  21. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Feb;1186:190-222 [PMID: 20201874]
  22. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1977 Mar;46(2):353-65 [PMID: 848570]
  23. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 Mar;933:265-77 [PMID: 12000027]
  24. Indian J Med Res. 2010 Aug;132:189-94 [PMID: 20716819]
  25. Curr Biol. 2011 Feb 8;21(3):195-9 [PMID: 21256020]
  26. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2010 Jul;23(4):324-9 [PMID: 20520549]
  27. Mov Disord. 2009 Apr 30;24(6):922-5 [PMID: 19260095]
  28. J Gen Intern Med. 2007 May;22(5):704-6 [PMID: 17443383]
  29. Neuroimage. 2011 Apr 15;55(4):1825-35 [PMID: 21272655]
  30. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2011;4:209-13 [PMID: 21811387]
  31. Georgian Med News. 2006 Jul;(136):121-4 [PMID: 16905865]
  32. Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Jul;193(1):51-9 [PMID: 18700219]
  33. Lancet Neurol. 2006 Aug;5(8):695-700 [PMID: 16857575]
  34. Acupunct Electrother Res. 2009;34(3-4):135-49 [PMID: 20344882]
  35. Mov Disord. 2007 Feb 15;22(3):395-9 [PMID: 17216648]
  36. Brain. 2005 Mar;128(Pt 3):490-9 [PMID: 15634731]
  37. J Comp Neurol. 2009 Apr 20;513(6):559-65 [PMID: 19235226]
  38. J Rheumatol. 2001 May;28(5):1068-72 [PMID: 11361191]
  39. Neuroscience. 2009 Sep 1;162(3):756-62 [PMID: 19409218]
  40. Ann Rheum Dis. 1947;6(4):204-7 [PMID: 18623769]

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Deep Brain Stimulation
Female
Humans
Hyperthermia, Induced
Male
Middle Aged
Osteoarthritis, Hip
Radiofrequency Therapy
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0GrouppatientspaincoxarthrosistwotreatedBbrainstimulationimprovementpatientimportantpsychogenicPatientscourselocalhyperthermiaradioelectricasymmetricalREACmotorbehaviorsignificantsymptomsstiffnessrangemotionmusclebulkworsenedcompletelytreatmentsBACKGROUND:wellknownpsychologicalcomponentsagingprocessmayalsomanifestmovementdisordersstudyanalyzedmedicalrecordssimilargroupsn=15differentclinicsrehabilitationtherapyMETHODS:traditionalphysiotherapyincludingsessionsimproveRESULTS:showeddecreaseinsignificantsinglegroupdevelopedresolvesignificantlydecreasedlevelsresolvedoneCONCLUSION:showntolerablesafeunderwenttreatmentappearedslightlybetteroutcomesappreciablephysicalmentalstatesaspectsparticularlyelderlyfunctionallimitationoftenassociatedexacerbatedcomponentComparisoncoxarthrosis:versusradioelectricanti-agingasymmetric

Similar Articles

Cited By