The organization of thanatology.

Kenneth J Doka, E Neil Heflin-Wells, Terry L Martin, Lula M Redmond, Sherry R Schachter
Author Information
  1. Kenneth J Doka: The College of New Rochelle, New York 10805, USA. KnDok@aol.com

Abstract

This article explores, using Wilensky's Model of Professionalization, the emergence of professional organizations within the thanatology. The authors review the history of four organizations--The Foundation of Thanatology, Ars Moriendi, The Forum for Death Education and Counseling (now the Association for Death Education and Counseling: A Thanatology Organization [ADEC]), and The International Work Group on Death, Dying, and Bereavement (IWG). The authors speculate on some of the reasons that the first two failed while IWG and ADEC remain viable-while noting challenges that these remaining thanatological organizations will experience as they seek to continue to stay relevant.

MeSH Term

Attitude to Death
Bereavement
Clinical Competence
Humans
International Cooperation
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
Societies, Scientific
Thanatology

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0DeathorganizationsthanatologyauthorsThanatologyEducationIWGarticleexploresusingWilensky'sModelProfessionalizationemergenceprofessionalwithinreviewhistoryfourorganizations--TheFoundationArsMoriendiForumCounselingnowAssociationCounseling:Organization[ADEC]InternationalWorkGroupDyingBereavementspeculatereasonsfirsttwofailedADECremainviable-whilenotingchallengesremainingthanatologicalwillexperienceseekcontinuestayrelevantorganization

Similar Articles

Cited By