Discounting of probabilistic rewards is associated with gambling abstinence in treatment-seeking pathological gamblers.

Nancy M Petry
Author Information
  1. Nancy M Petry: Calhoun Cardiology Center, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT 06030-3944, USA. npetry@uchc.edu

Abstract

Individuals with addictive disorders, including substance abusers and pathological gamblers, discount or devalue rewards delayed in time more than controls. Theoretically, preference for probabilistic rewards is directly related to gambling, but limited empirical research has examined probabilistic discounting in individuals with pathological gambling. This study evaluated probability and delay discounting in treatment-seeking pathological gamblers and their association with gambling treatment outcomes during and after treatment. At time of treatment entry, 226 pathological gamblers completed probability and delay discounting tasks. They were then randomized to one of three treatment conditions, and gambling behavior was measured throughout treatment and at a 1-year follow-up assessment. After controlling for possibly confounding variables and treatment condition, more shallow probability discounting was associated with greater reductions in amounts wagered during treatment and likelihood of gambling abstinence at the end of treatment and throughout the follow-up period. No associations were noted between delay discounting and gambling treatment outcomes. These data suggest that probability discounting may be an important construct in understanding pathological gambling and its treatment.

References

  1. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2003 Jun;191(6):399-407 [PMID: 12826922]
  2. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001 Mar;154(3):243-50 [PMID: 11351931]
  3. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Apr;15(2):176-86 [PMID: 17469941]
  4. J Gambl Stud. 2005 Spring;21(1):49-59 [PMID: 15789190]
  5. Psychol Bull. 2004 Sep;130(5):769-92 [PMID: 15367080]
  6. J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Mar;71(2):121-43 [PMID: 10220927]
  7. Am J Psychiatry. 1987 Sep;144(9):1184-8 [PMID: 3631315]
  8. Br J Addict. 1989 Apr;84(4):391-3 [PMID: 2720191]
  9. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Mar;55(2):233-44 [PMID: 2037827]
  10. Behav Res Ther. 2009 Mar;47(3):189-97 [PMID: 19118818]
  11. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Jun;74(3):555-67 [PMID: 16822112]
  12. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 Oct;17(5):283-90 [PMID: 19803627]
  13. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 May;66(5):564-74 [PMID: 15889941]
  14. Am J Addict. 2007 Jul-Aug;16(4):272-82 [PMID: 17661195]
  15. Behav Pharmacol. 2006 Dec;17(8):651-67 [PMID: 17110792]
  16. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1999 Aug 2;56(1):25-32 [PMID: 10462089]
  17. Addiction. 2010 Dec;105(12):2169-75 [PMID: 20854336]
  18. Br J Addict. 1991 Aug;86(8):1017-28 [PMID: 1912747]
  19. Pers Individ Dif. 2007 Nov;43(7):1886-1897 [PMID: 18978926]
  20. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1999 Mar;128(1):78-87 [PMID: 10100392]
  21. Addict Behav. 2002 Jan-Feb;27(1):1-19 [PMID: 11800216]
  22. Behav Processes. 2010 Jul;84(3):687-92 [PMID: 20385215]
  23. J Gambl Stud. 2007 Sep;23(3):335-45 [PMID: 17479359]
  24. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999 Mar;25(2):418-27 [PMID: 10093208]
  25. Psychol Rep. 1978 Dec;43(3 Pt 2):1247-55 [PMID: 746091]
  26. J Gambl Stud. 2009 Jun;25(2):201-14 [PMID: 19199009]
  27. J Gambl Stud. 2006 Fall;22(3):339-54 [PMID: 16826455]
  28. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Jun 1;141(11):1097-105 [PMID: 7771444]
  29. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Jun;63(6):1072-84 [PMID: 19890767]
  30. Behav Processes. 2003 Oct 31;64(3):355-367 [PMID: 14580704]
  31. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Feb;163(2):297-302 [PMID: 16449485]
  32. Am Econ Rev. 2010 Sep 1;100(4):1913-1928 [PMID: 20871741]
  33. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Apr;16(2):113-23 [PMID: 18489015]
  34. J Abnorm Psychol. 2001 Aug;110(3):482-7 [PMID: 11502091]
  35. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Sep;90 Suppl 1:S85-91 [PMID: 17101239]
  36. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Mar;190(4):485-96 [PMID: 17205320]
  37. Addiction. 2001 Jan;96(1):73-86 [PMID: 11177521]
  38. J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 1994 Dec;12:70-5 [PMID: 7723001]
  39. J Appl Behav Anal. 2003 Winter;36(4):449-58 [PMID: 14768665]

Grants

  1. R01 DA013444/NIDA NIH HHS
  2. R01-DA018883/NIDA NIH HHS
  3. P50 DA009241/NIDA NIH HHS
  4. R01 DA021567/NIDA NIH HHS
  5. R01 DA018883/NIDA NIH HHS
  6. R01-DA021567/NIDA NIH HHS
  7. R01-DA022739/NIDA NIH HHS
  8. P60 AA003510/NIAAA NIH HHS
  9. R01-DA016855/NIDA NIH HHS
  10. R01-MH60417/NIMH NIH HHS
  11. R01-DA027615/NIDA NIH HHS
  12. R01-DA13444/NIDA NIH HHS
  13. R01 DA027615/NIDA NIH HHS
  14. P50 AA003510/NIAAA NIH HHS
  15. P30-DA023918/NIDA NIH HHS
  16. R01 DA014618/NIDA NIH HHS
  17. R01 DA022739/NIDA NIH HHS
  18. R01 MH060417/NIMH NIH HHS
  19. R01 DA016855/NIDA NIH HHS
  20. R01-DA14618/NIDA NIH HHS
  21. P60-AA03510/NIAAA NIH HHS
  22. P30 DA023918/NIDA NIH HHS
  23. P50-DA09241/NIDA NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gambling
Humans
Impulsive Behavior
Male
Middle Aged
Odds Ratio
Probability
Psychotherapy, Group
Reward
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0treatmentgamblingpathologicaldiscountinggamblersprobabilityrewardsprobabilisticdelaytimetreatment-seekingoutcomesthroughoutfollow-upassociatedabstinenceIndividualsaddictivedisordersincludingsubstanceabusersdiscountdevaluedelayedcontrolsTheoreticallypreferencedirectlyrelatedlimitedempiricalresearchexaminedindividualsstudyevaluatedassociationentry226completedtasksrandomizedonethreeconditionsbehaviormeasured1-yearassessmentcontrollingpossiblyconfoundingvariablesconditionshallowgreaterreductionsamountswageredlikelihoodendperiodassociationsnoteddatasuggestmayimportantconstructunderstandingDiscounting

Similar Articles

Cited By