Global habitat suitability models of terrestrial mammals.

Carlo Rondinini, Moreno Di Marco, Federica Chiozza, Giulia Santulli, Daniele Baisero, Piero Visconti, Michael Hoffmann, Jan Schipper, Simon N Stuart, Marcelo F Tognelli, Giovanni Amori, Alessandra Falcucci, Luigi Maiorano, Luigi Boitani
Author Information
  1. Carlo Rondinini: Global Mammal Assessment programme, Department of Biology and Biotechnologies, Sapienza Università di Roma, Viale dell'Università 32, 00185 Rome, Italy. carlo.rondinini@uniroma1.it

Abstract

Detailed large-scale information on mammal distribution has often been lacking, hindering conservation efforts. We used the information from the 2009 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species as a baseline for developing habitat suitability models for 5027 out of 5330 known terrestrial mammal species, based on their habitat relationships. We focused on the following environmental variables: land cover, elevation and hydrological features. Models were developed at 300 m resolution and limited to within species' known geographical ranges. A subset of the models was validated using points of known species occurrence. We conducted a global, fine-scale analysis of patterns of species richness. The richness of mammal species estimated by the overlap of their suitable habitat is on average one-third less than that estimated by the overlap of their geographical ranges. The highest absolute difference is found in tropical and subtropical regions in South America, Africa and Southeast Asia that are not covered by dense forest. The proportion of suitable habitat within mammal geographical ranges correlates with the IUCN Red List category to which they have been assigned, decreasing monotonically from Least Concern to Endangered. These results demonstrate the importance of fine-resolution distribution data for the development of global conservation strategies for mammals.

References

  1. Science. 2008 Oct 10;322(5899):225-30 [PMID: 18845749]
  2. Ecol Lett. 2006 Oct;9(10):1136-45 [PMID: 16972877]
  3. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Sep 27;366(1578):2623-32 [PMID: 21844041]
  4. Nature. 2004 Apr 8;428(6983):640-3 [PMID: 15071592]
  5. Conserv Biol. 2008 Aug;22(4):1037-44 [PMID: 18616739]
  6. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Sep 27;366(1578):2642-51 [PMID: 21844043]
  7. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Sep 27;366(1578):2693-702 [PMID: 21844048]
  8. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Sep 27;366(1578):2681-92 [PMID: 21844047]
  9. Nature. 2000 May 25;405(6785):393-4 [PMID: 10839514]
  10. Conserv Biol. 2006 Feb;20(1):170-9 [PMID: 16909670]
  11. Nature. 2009 Nov 19;462(7271):280-1 [PMID: 19924192]
  12. Conserv Biol. 2008 Feb;22(1):110-9 [PMID: 18273953]
  13. Science. 2005 Jul 22;309(5734):603-7 [PMID: 16040704]

MeSH Term

Animals
Conservation of Natural Resources
Ecosystem
Mammals
Maps as Topic
Models, Biological

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0habitatmammalspeciesmodelsknowngeographicalrangesinformationdistributionconservationIUCNRedListsuitabilityterrestrialwithinglobalrichnessestimatedoverlapsuitablemammalsDetailedlarge-scaleoftenlackinghinderingeffortsused2009ThreatenedSpeciesbaselinedeveloping50275330basedrelationshipsfocusedfollowingenvironmentalvariables:landcoverelevationhydrologicalfeaturesModelsdeveloped300mresolutionlimitedspecies'subsetvalidatedusingpointsoccurrenceconductedfine-scaleanalysispatternsaverageone-thirdlesshighestabsolutedifferencefoundtropicalsubtropicalregionsSouthAmericaAfricaSoutheastAsiacovereddenseforestproportioncorrelatescategoryassigneddecreasingmonotonicallyLeastConcernEndangeredresultsdemonstrateimportancefine-resolutiondatadevelopmentstrategiesGlobal

Similar Articles

Cited By