Testing multiple coordination constraints with a novel bimanual visuomotor task.

Helene M Sisti, Monique Geurts, René Clerckx, Jolien Gooijers, James P Coxon, Marcus H Heitger, Karen Caeyenberghs, Iseult A M Beets, Leen Serbruyns, Stephan P Swinnen
Author Information
  1. Helene M Sisti: Motor Control Laboratory, Research Center of Movement Control and Neuroplasticity, Department of Biomedical Kinesiology, Group Biomedical Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Helene.Sisti@faber.kuleuven.be

Abstract

The acquisition of a new bimanual skill depends on several motor coordination constraints. To date, coordination constraints have often been tested relatively independently of one another, particularly with respect to isofrequency and multifrequency rhythms. Here, we used a new paradigm to test the interaction of multiple coordination constraints. Coordination constraints that were tested included temporal complexity, directionality, muscle grouping, and hand dominance. Twenty-two healthy young adults performed a bimanual dial rotation task that required left and right hand coordination to track a moving target on a computer monitor. Two groups were compared, either with or without four days of practice with augmented visual feedback. Four directional patterns were tested such that both hands moved either rightward (clockwise), leftward (counterclockwise), inward or outward relative to each other. Seven frequency ratios (3∶1, 2∶1, 3∶2, 1∶1, 2∶3. 1∶2, 1∶3) between the left and right hand were introduced. As expected, isofrequency patterns (1∶1) were performed more successfully than multifrequency patterns (non 1∶1). In addition, performance was more accurate when participants were required to move faster with the dominant right hand (1∶3, 1∶2 and 2∶3) than with the non-dominant left hand (3∶1, 2∶1, 3∶2). Interestingly, performance deteriorated as the relative angular velocity between the two hands increased, regardless of whether the required frequency ratio was an integer or non-integer. This contrasted with previous finger tapping research where the integer ratios generally led to less error than the non-integer ratios. We suggest that this is due to the different movement topologies that are required of each paradigm. Overall, we found that this visuomotor task was useful for testing the interaction of multiple coordination constraints as well as the release from these constraints with practice in the presence of augmented visual feedback.

References

  1. Can J Exp Psychol. 1997 Mar;51(1):1-9 [PMID: 9206321]
  2. Exp Brain Res. 2010 Sep;205(3):351-62 [PMID: 20658129]
  3. Hum Mov Sci. 2002 Dec;21(5-6):723-48 [PMID: 12620718]
  4. Percept Psychophys. 1985 Jan;37(1):1-7 [PMID: 3991313]
  5. Hum Mov Sci. 2006 Jun;25(3):339-48 [PMID: 16707177]
  6. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999 Oct;25(5):1316-30 [PMID: 10531665]
  7. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2008;17(2):130-135 [PMID: 19606276]
  8. Behav Brain Res. 1998 Jan;90(1):79-87 [PMID: 9520215]
  9. Behav Brain Res. 2004 Jul 9;152(2):437-45 [PMID: 15196812]
  10. Exp Brain Res. 1997 Mar;113(3):497-508 [PMID: 9108216]
  11. Brain Cogn. 2002 Feb;48(1):166-78 [PMID: 11812040]
  12. Biol Cybern. 1995 Nov;73(6):499-507 [PMID: 8527496]
  13. Percept Psychophys. 1983 Oct;34(4):331-7 [PMID: 6657434]
  14. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Mar;130(3):183-95 [PMID: 19166988]
  15. Am J Physiol. 1984 Jun;246(6 Pt 2):R1000-4 [PMID: 6742155]
  16. Cortex. 2009 Mar;45(3):377-85 [PMID: 18718578]
  17. Brain Cogn. 1990 Nov;14(2):185-200 [PMID: 2285512]
  18. Biol Cybern. 1985;51(5):347-56 [PMID: 3978150]
  19. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007 Feb;124(2):209-37 [PMID: 16777042]
  20. Behav Brain Res. 2008 Mar 5;187(2):361-70 [PMID: 17983673]
  21. Psychol Res. 1998;61(3):191-203 [PMID: 9747598]
  22. Psychol Res. 1997;60(4):202-13 [PMID: 9440358]
  23. Prog Brain Res. 2004;143:491-505 [PMID: 14653191]
  24. Neuropsychologia. 2008 Jan 31;46(2):419-25 [PMID: 17904169]
  25. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 May;3(5):348-59 [PMID: 11988774]
  26. J Neurophysiol. 2005 Oct;94(4):2901-10 [PMID: 16014794]
  27. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Jan;8(1):18-25 [PMID: 14697399]
  28. Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):764-76 [PMID: 12880805]
  29. Percept Psychophys. 1999 Feb;61(2):246-58 [PMID: 10089759]
  30. Neuropsychologia. 1972 Sep;10(3):267-77 [PMID: 5080490]
  31. Neuropsychologia. 1996 Dec;34(12):1203-13 [PMID: 8951832]
  32. Psychol Rev. 1995 Jan;102(1):28-67 [PMID: 7878161]
  33. Exp Brain Res. 2009 Nov;199(2):195-200 [PMID: 19730838]
  34. Mov Disord. 1997 Nov;12(6):958-68 [PMID: 9399221]
  35. Exp Brain Res. 2000 Mar;131(2):196-214 [PMID: 10766272]
  36. Nature. 2001 Nov 1;414(6859):69-73 [PMID: 11689944]
  37. J Mot Behav. 2002 Jun;34(2):183-95 [PMID: 12057891]
  38. Neurosci Lett. 2003 Mar 6;338(3):205-8 [PMID: 12581832]
  39. J Neurophysiol. 2009 Jul;102(1):302-11 [PMID: 19369359]
  40. Exp Brain Res. 2009 Aug;197(3):269-78 [PMID: 19565226]
  41. J Mot Behav. 2002 Dec;34(4):402-12 [PMID: 12446253]
  42. Motor Control. 2004 Apr;8(2):213-33 [PMID: 15118203]
  43. J Mot Behav. 1995 Sep;27(3):263-274 [PMID: 12529237]
  44. Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113 [PMID: 5146491]
  45. Cereb Cortex. 2011 Jun;21(6):1283-94 [PMID: 21030486]
  46. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993 Apr;19(2):416-28 [PMID: 8473848]
  47. Exp Brain Res. 2005 Sep;165(3):351-61 [PMID: 15895217]
  48. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2002 Jun;110(2-3):129-37 [PMID: 12102102]
  49. Hum Mov Sci. 2007 Apr;26(2):235-46 [PMID: 17363098]
  50. Biol Cybern. 1995 Sep;73(4):301-9 [PMID: 7578471]
  51. Exp Brain Res. 2010 Sep;205(4):513-20 [PMID: 20703872]
  52. Exp Brain Res. 2010 Apr;202(2):519-25 [PMID: 20069285]
  53. Motor Control. 2001 Apr;5(2):99-115 [PMID: 11303108]
  54. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1985 Dec;11(6):814-27 [PMID: 2934510]
  55. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 May;18(2):403-21 [PMID: 1593227]
  56. Hum Mov Sci. 2003 Aug;22(3):339-63 [PMID: 12967762]
  57. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(7):855-67 [PMID: 14998701]
  58. J Neurophysiol. 2010 Apr;103(4):2027-38 [PMID: 20071629]
  59. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Dec;12(6):969-92 [PMID: 16615317]
  60. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Aug;36(4):936-54 [PMID: 20695710]
  61. J Mot Behav. 2001 Mar;33(1):103-12 [PMID: 11265060]
  62. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002 Dec;978:302-17 [PMID: 12582062]
  63. Neurosci Lett. 2008 May 23;437(1):10-4 [PMID: 18423866]
  64. J Mot Behav. 1995 Jun;27(2):123-137 [PMID: 12736122]
  65. Motor Control. 1998 Apr;2(2):106-13 [PMID: 9644281]

MeSH Term

Adult
Analysis of Variance
Female
Fingers
Functional Laterality
Hand
Humans
Learning
Male
Movement
Psychomotor Performance
Visual Perception
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0constraintscoordinationhandrequiredbimanualtestedmultipletaskleftrightpatternsratios1∶1newisofrequencymultifrequencyparadigminteractionperformedeitherpracticeaugmentedvisualfeedbackhandsrelativefrequency3∶12∶13∶22∶31∶21∶3performanceintegernon-integervisuomotoracquisitionskilldependsseveralmotordateoftenrelativelyindependentlyoneanotherparticularlyrespectrhythmsusedtestCoordinationincludedtemporalcomplexitydirectionalitymusclegroupingdominanceTwenty-twohealthyyoungadultsdialrotationtrackmovingtargetcomputermonitorTwogroupscomparedwithoutfourdaysFourdirectionalmovedrightwardclockwiseleftwardcounterclockwiseinwardoutwardSevenintroducedexpectedsuccessfullynonadditionaccurateparticipantsmovefasterdominantnon-dominantInterestinglydeterioratedangularvelocitytwoincreasedregardlesswhetherratiocontrastedpreviousfingertappingresearchgenerallyledlesserrorsuggestduedifferentmovementtopologiesOverallfoundusefultestingwellreleasepresenceTestingnovel

Similar Articles

Cited By