The effect of Medicaid nursing home reimbursement policy on Medicare hospice use in nursing homes.

Susan C Miller, Pedro Gozalo, Julie C Lima, Vincent Mor
Author Information
  1. Susan C Miller: Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA. Susan_Miller@brown.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To understand how changes in Medicaid nursing home (NH) reimbursement policy and rates affect a NH's approach to end-of-life care (ie, its use of hospice).
METHODS: This longitudinal study merged US NH decedents' (1999 to 2004) resident assessment data (MDS) with Part A claims data to determine the proportion of a NH's decedents using hospice. Freestanding NHs across the 48 contiguous US states were included. A NH-level analytic file was merged with NH survey (ie, OSCAR) and area resource file data, and with annual data on state Medicaid NH rates, case-mix reimbursement policies, and hospice certificate of need (CON). NH fixed-effect (within) regression analysis examined the effect of changing state policies, controlling for differing time trends in CON and case-mix states and for facility-level and county-level attributes. Models were stratified by urban/rural status.
RESULTS: A $10 increase in the Medicaid rate resulted in a 0.41% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.275, 0.553] increase in hospice use in urban NHs and a 0.37% decrease (95% CI: -0.676, -0.063) in rural NHs not adjacent to urban areas. There was a nonstatistically significant increase in rural NHs adjacent to urban areas. Introduction of case-mix reimbursement resulted in a 2.14% (95% CI: 1.388, 2.896) increase in hospice use in urban NHs, with comparable increases in rural NHs.
CONCLUSIONS: This study supports and extends previous research by showing changes in Medicaid NH reimbursement policies affect a NH's approach to end-of-life care. It also shows how policy changes can have differing effects depending on a NH's urban/rural status.

References

  1. Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug;41(4 Pt 1):1317-36 [PMID: 16899009]
  2. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Aug;58(8):1481-8 [PMID: 20646101]
  3. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Jan;59(1):3-9 [PMID: 21198463]
  4. Am J Med. 2001 Jul;111(1):38-44 [PMID: 11448659]
  5. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Aug;48(8):879-82 [PMID: 10968290]
  6. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003 Sep;26(3):791-9 [PMID: 12967728]
  7. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 May;52(5):731-5 [PMID: 15086653]
  8. J Palliat Med. 2008 Jul;11(6):866-77 [PMID: 18715179]
  9. J Palliat Med. 2010 May;13(5):525-33 [PMID: 20377497]
  10. N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 15;361(16):1529-38 [PMID: 19828530]
  11. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 May;41(5):517-22 [PMID: 8486885]
  12. J Palliat Med. 2010 Nov;13(11):1331-8 [PMID: 20979524]
  13. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jan-Jun;Suppl Web Exclusives:W4-363-73 [PMID: 15451956]
  14. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Mar;50(3):507-15 [PMID: 11943048]
  15. JAMA. 1998 Jun 17;279(23):1877-82 [PMID: 9634258]
  16. J Palliat Med. 2002 Feb;5(1):117-25 [PMID: 11839234]
  17. J Palliat Med. 2006 Dec;9(6):1388-400 [PMID: 17187547]
  18. Med Care. 2008 Jan;46(1):33-40 [PMID: 18162853]
  19. Health Serv Res. 2007 Apr;42(2):587-610 [PMID: 17362208]
  20. Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug;42(4):1651-71 [PMID: 17610442]
  21. JAMA. 2000 Nov 15;284(19):2489-94 [PMID: 11074779]
  22. Gerontologist. 2008 Aug;48(4):477-84 [PMID: 18728297]
  23. Gerontologist. 2011 Apr;51(2):251-60 [PMID: 21076085]
  24. Health Serv Res. 2011 Feb;46(1 Pt 1):120-37 [PMID: 21029090]
  25. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010 Sep;11(7):494-9 [PMID: 20816337]
  26. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004 Dec;28(6):537-47 [PMID: 15589079]
  27. JAMA. 2004 Jan 7;291(1):88-93 [PMID: 14709580]
  28. J Clin Oncol. 1995 Sep;13(9):2158-65 [PMID: 7666074]
  29. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2009 Feb;34(1):93-135 [PMID: 19234295]

Grants

  1. P01 AG027296/NIA NIH HHS
  2. R03 HS016918/AHRQ HHS
  3. P01AG027296/NIA NIH HHS
  4. R03HS016918/AHRQ HHS

MeSH Term

Diagnosis-Related Groups
Health Policy
Hospices
Humans
Insurance, Health, Reimbursement
Longitudinal Studies
Medicaid
Medicare Part A
Nursing Homes
Regression Analysis
Rural Health Services
United States
Urban Health Services

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0NHhospiceNHsMedicaidreimbursementNH'susedataincrease0urbanchangesnursingpolicycase-mixpoliciesruralhomeratesaffectapproachend-of-lifecareiestudymergedUSstatesfilestateCONeffectdifferingurban/ruralstatusresulted95%CI:-0adjacentareas2OBJECTIVE:understandMETHODS:longitudinaldecedents'19992004residentassessmentMDSPartclaimsdetermineproportiondecedentsusingFreestandingacross48contiguousincludedNH-levelanalyticsurveyOSCARarearesourceannualcertificateneedfixed-effectwithinregressionanalysisexaminedchangingcontrollingtimetrendsfacility-levelcounty-levelattributesModelsstratifiedRESULTS:$10rate41%[95%confidenceintervalCI:275553]37%decrease676063nonstatisticallysignificantIntroduction14%1388896comparableincreasesCONCLUSIONS:supportsextendspreviousresearchshowingalsoshowscaneffectsdependingMedicarehomes

Similar Articles

Cited By