Ipsilateral masking between acoustic and electric stimulations.

Payton Lin, Christopher W Turner, Bruce J Gantz, Hamid R Djalilian, Fan-Gang Zeng
Author Information
  1. Payton Lin: Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA 92617, USA. paytonl@uci.edu.

Abstract

Residual acoustic hearing can be preserved in the same ear following cochlear implantation with minimally traumatic surgical techniques and short-electrode arrays. The combined electric-acoustic stimulation significantly improves cochlear implant performance, particularly speech recognition in noise. The present study measures simultaneous masking by electric pulses on acoustic pure tones, or vice versa, to investigate electric-acoustic interactions and their underlying psychophysical mechanisms. Six subjects, with acoustic hearing preserved at low frequencies in their implanted ear, participated in the study. One subject had a fully inserted 24 mm Nucleus Freedom array and five subjects had Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implants that were only 10 mm in length. Electric masking data of the long-electrode subject showed that stimulation from the most apical electrodes produced threshold elevations over 10 dB for 500, 625, and 750 Hz probe tones, but no elevation for 125 and 250 Hz tones. On the contrary, electric stimulation did not produce any electric masking in the short-electrode subjects. In the acoustic masking experiment, 125-750 Hz pure tones were used to acoustically mask electric stimulation. The acoustic masking results showed that, independent of pure tone frequency, both long- and short-electrode subjects showed threshold elevations at apical and basal electrodes. The present results can be interpreted in terms of underlying physiological mechanisms related to either place-dependent peripheral masking or place-independent central masking.

References

  1. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Mar;117(3 Pt 1):1351-61 [PMID: 15807023]
  2. Hear Res. 1999 Jan;127(1-2):108-18 [PMID: 9925022]
  3. J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Feb;49(2):Suppl 2:467+ [PMID: 5541744]
  4. Audiol Neurootol. 2001 Mar-Apr;6(2):87-97 [PMID: 11385182]
  5. Laryngoscope. 2005 May;115(5):796-802 [PMID: 15867642]
  6. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1999 Nov-Dec;61(6):334-40 [PMID: 10545807]
  7. J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Feb;87(2):791-809 [PMID: 2307776]
  8. Hear Res. 1984 Jun;14(3):225-43 [PMID: 6480511]
  9. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2005 Dec;6(4):390-400 [PMID: 16261267]
  10. Acta Otolaryngol. 2004 May;124(4):344-7 [PMID: 15224850]
  11. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Dec;104(6):3500-10 [PMID: 9857509]
  12. Ear Hear. 2007 Apr;28(2 Suppl):114S-118S [PMID: 17496661]
  13. J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Sep;86(3):971-80 [PMID: 2794250]
  14. Hear Res. 1983 Oct;12(1):1-16 [PMID: 6689326]
  15. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004 Jan;51(1):13-20 [PMID: 14723489]
  16. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Apr;115(4):1729-35 [PMID: 15101651]
  17. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 May;103(5 Pt 1):2565-72 [PMID: 9604350]
  18. Hear Res. 1995 Jul;87(1-2):170-86 [PMID: 8567435]
  19. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1972 Oct;81(5):714-30 [PMID: 4651114]
  20. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Jul;102(1):495-507 [PMID: 9228813]
  21. Audiol Neurootol. 2006;11 Suppl 1:12-5 [PMID: 17063005]
  22. Hear Res. 1998 May;119(1-2):142-54 [PMID: 9641327]

Grants

  1. P50 DC000242/NIDCD NIH HHS
  2. P50 DC00242/NIDCD NIH HHS
  3. P30 DC008369/NIDCD NIH HHS
  4. R01 DC000377/NIDCD NIH HHS
  5. R01 DC008858/NIDCD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Acoustic Stimulation
Adult
Aged
Audiometry, Pure-Tone
Auditory Pathways
Auditory Perception
Auditory Threshold
Cochlear Implantation
Cochlear Implants
Correction of Hearing Impairment
Electric Stimulation
Humans
Middle Aged
Perceptual Masking
Persons With Hearing Impairments
Prosthesis Design
Psychoacoustics

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0maskingacousticelectricstimulationtonessubjectsshort-electrodepureshowedHzhearingcanpreservedearcochlearelectric-acousticpresentstudyunderlyingmechanismssubjectmm10apicalelectrodesthresholdelevationsresultsResidualfollowingimplantationminimallytraumaticsurgicaltechniquesarrayscombinedsignificantlyimprovesimplantperformanceparticularlyspeechrecognitionnoisemeasuressimultaneouspulsesviceversainvestigateinteractionspsychophysicalSixlowfrequenciesimplantedparticipatedOnefullyinserted24NucleusFreedomarrayfiveIowa/NucleushybridimplantslengthElectricdatalong-electrodeproduceddB500625750probeelevation125250contraryproduceexperiment125-750usedacousticallymaskindependenttonefrequencylong-basalinterpretedtermsphysiologicalrelatedeitherplace-dependentperipheralplace-independentcentralIpsilateralstimulations

Similar Articles

Cited By