Cost-effectiveness analysis of pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination from age 60 in São Paulo State, Brazil.

Joao Tonolio Neto, Gabriela Tannus Branco de Araujo, Anna Gagliardi, Amanda Pinho, Laure Durand, Marcelo Fonseca
Author Information
  1. Joao Tonolio Neto: Federal University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Abstract

Vaccination of adults aged 60 years and older against Streptococcus pneumonia is not recommended in Brazil. The 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine (PPV23) is only available for institutionalized persons or with underlying diseases despite the substantial medical and economic burden related to pneumococcal infections in adults over than 59 years. The study aimed at evaluating the cost effectiveness of implementing a large PPV program in this population. This analysis was performed using a static decision tree model. Demographic and epidemiological data were obtained from Brazilian official sources and international literature. Economic data were obtained from a study performed in 2007 in a public and a private hospital located in Sao Paulo. Vaccination was assumed to protect for 5 years with 60% effectiveness against bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia (BPP) and 21% effectiveness against non bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia (NBPP). Deterministic and sensitivity analyses were performed. The pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination saved 5,218 life year gained (LYG). The vaccination program was found to be cost effective in the social security and public health care perspectives with a mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of R$10,887 and R$8,281 per LYG respectively. Results were sensitive to the vaccine effectiveness against NBPP, the incidence and case-fatality rate of NBPP. From a societal perspective, PPV23 program for adults 60 and older was found to be cost-saving. Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination is clinically and economically favored over the present vaccination strategy, in which persons aged over 59 years in Sao Paulo, have not been vaccinated.

References

  1. Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19(4):365-75 [PMID: 15180107]
  2. Future Microbiol. 2008 Feb;3(1):23-30 [PMID: 18230031]
  3. Eur Respir J. 2010 Sep;36(3):608-14 [PMID: 20075048]
  4. Vaccine. 2010 Jul 12;28(31):4955-60 [PMID: 20576535]
  5. Lancet. 2008 Aug 2;372(9636):398-405 [PMID: 18675690]
  6. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Dec 1;39(11):1642-50 [PMID: 15578365]
  7. Chest. 2008 Dec;134(6):1141-1148 [PMID: 18689592]
  8. Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Oct 1;43(7):860-8 [PMID: 16941367]
  9. Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Jul 1;51(1):15-22 [PMID: 20504233]
  10. Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Aug;31(2):444-50 [PMID: 10987703]
  11. BMC Infect Dis. 2008 Apr 23;8:53 [PMID: 18433473]
  12. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2008 Oct 17;83(42):373-84 [PMID: 18927997]
  13. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2003 Aug;2(4):477-82 [PMID: 14711333]
  14. Chest. 2000 Nov;118(5):1344-54 [PMID: 11083685]
  15. Vaccine. 2008 Mar 10;26(11):1420-31 [PMID: 18272262]
  16. N Engl J Med. 1991 Nov 21;325(21):1453-60 [PMID: 1944423]
  17. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Oct 8;167(18):1938-43 [PMID: 17923592]
  18. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 May;29(5):385-94 [PMID: 18521990]
  19. BMJ. 2010 Mar 08;340:c1004 [PMID: 20211953]
  20. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Apr;30(2):210-38 [PMID: 19296420]
  21. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999;16 Suppl 1:33-40 [PMID: 10623374]
  22. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010 May;16(5):402-10 [PMID: 20132251]
  23. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD000422 [PMID: 18253977]
  24. Vaccine. 2007 Jan 5;25(3):458-65 [PMID: 17049685]
  25. Vaccine. 2011 Apr 5;29(16):2840-5 [PMID: 21334388]
  26. Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(2):215-22 [PMID: 11284385]
  27. Lancet. 2009 Oct 31;374(9700):1543-56 [PMID: 19880020]
  28. Euro Surveill. 2006 Sep;11(9):171-8 [PMID: 17075159]
  29. Arch Intern Med. 1999 Nov 8;159(20):2437-42 [PMID: 10665892]
  30. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Aug;26(8):531-40 [PMID: 17570001]
  31. Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Dec 15;33(12):2078-9 [PMID: 11700581]
  32. Clin Infect Dis. 2005 May 1;40(9):1250-7 [PMID: 15825026]
  33. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2010 Oct 22;85(43):434-6 [PMID: 21038716]
  34. Vaccine. 2009 Mar 4;27(10):1504-10 [PMID: 19171174]
  35. Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Jun;34(3):565-74 [PMID: 15764694]
  36. Medicina (B Aires). 2003;63(1):1-8 [PMID: 12673953]
  37. Crit Care Clin. 2003 Oct;19(4):729-48 [PMID: 14601717]
  38. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2010 Nov;9(11):1241-4 [PMID: 21087102]
  39. Vaccine. 1997 Feb;15(3):317-20 [PMID: 9139492]
  40. N Engl J Med. 2003 May 1;348(18):1747-55 [PMID: 12724480]
  41. Int J Infect Dis. 2010 Oct;14(10):e852-6 [PMID: 20615741]
  42. Vaccine. 2004 Aug 13;22(23-24):3214-24 [PMID: 15297076]
  43. Hum Vaccin. 2011 Apr;7(4):441-50 [PMID: 21441776]
  44. Vaccine. 2009 May 21;27(24):3159-64 [PMID: 19446186]
  45. JAMA. 1993 Oct 20;270(15):1826-31 [PMID: 8411526]
  46. CMAJ. 2009 Jan 6;180(1):48-58 [PMID: 19124790]
  47. BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Mar 18;10:73 [PMID: 20298596]
  48. JAMA. 2001 Apr 4;285(13):1729-35 [PMID: 11277827]
  49. Vaccine. 2004 Feb 25;22(8):927-46 [PMID: 15161070]
  50. Am J Prev Med. 2010 Oct;39(4):287-95 [PMID: 20837278]
  51. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Jun;17(6):591-601 [PMID: 10977396]
  52. JAMA. 1997 Oct 22-29;278(16):1333-9 [PMID: 9343464]

MeSH Term

Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Brazil
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Statistical
Pneumococcal Infections
Pneumococcal Vaccines

Chemicals

23-valent pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide vaccine
Pneumococcal Vaccines

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pneumococcalvaccinationyearspolysaccharideeffectivenessadults60pneumoniaprogramperformedPauloNBPPVaccinationagedolderBrazilvaccinePPV23persons59studycostanalysisdataobtainedpublicSao5bacteremicLYGfoundStreptococcusrecommended23-valentavailableinstitutionalizedunderlyingdiseasesdespitesubstantialmedicaleconomicburdenrelatedinfectionsaimedevaluatingimplementinglargePPVpopulationusingstaticdecisiontreemodelDemographicepidemiologicalBrazilianofficialsourcesinternationalliteratureEconomic2007privatehospitallocatedassumedprotect60%BPP21%nonDeterministicsensitivityanalysessaved218lifeyeargainedeffectivesocialsecurityhealthcareperspectivesmeanincrementalcost-effectivenessratioR$10887R$8281perrespectivelyResultssensitiveincidencecase-fatalityratesocietalperspectivecost-savingPneumococcalclinicallyeconomicallyfavoredpresentstrategyvaccinatedCost-effectivenessageSãoState

Similar Articles

Cited By