Evaluation of the new AJCC staging system for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Chih H Cheng, Chen F Lee, Tsung H Wu, Kun M Chan, Hong S Chou, Ting J Wu, Ming C Yu, Tse C Chen, Wei C Lee, Miin F Chen
Author Information
  1. Chih H Cheng: Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Chang Gung University Medical School, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM system (TNM-7) for patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
METHODS: Partial hepatectomies performed for 879 patients from 1993 to 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological factors, surgical outcome, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed to evaluate the predictive value of the TNM-7 staging system.
RESULTS: According to the TNM-7 system, differences in five-year survival between stages I, II, and III were statistically significant. Subgroup analysis of stage III patients revealed that the difference between stages II and IIIA was not significant (OS, p = 0.246; DFS, p = 0.105). Further stratification of stages IIIA, IIIB and IIIC also did not reveal significant differences. Cox proportional hazard models of stage III analyses identified additional clinicopathological factors affecting patient survival: lack of tumor encapsulation, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) values > 68 U/L, and blood loss > 500 mL affected DFS whereas lack of tumor encapsulation, AST values > 68 U/L, blood loss > 500 mL, and serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) values > 200 ng/mL were independent factors impairing OS. Stage III factors including tumor thrombus, satellite lesions, and tumor rupture did not appear to influence survival in the stage III subgroup.
CONCLUSIONS: In terms of 5-year survival rates, the TNM-7 system is capable of stratifying post-hepatectomy HCC patients into stages I, II, and III but is unable to stratify stage III patients into stages IIIA, IIIB and IIIC. Lack of tumor encapsulation, AST values > 68 U/L, blood loss > 500 mL, and AFP values > 200 ng/mL are independent prognostic factors affecting long-term survival.

References

  1. Ann Surg. 1999 Mar;229(3):322-30 [PMID: 10077043]
  2. Eur J Cancer. 2011 May;47(7):1115-24 [PMID: 21349701]
  3. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Oct;203(4):426-35 [PMID: 17000385]
  4. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Jan-Feb;54(73):234-7 [PMID: 17419267]
  5. Surgery. 2011 Jun;149(6):783-91 [PMID: 21310450]
  6. Liver. 1993 Aug;13(4):177-82 [PMID: 7690873]
  7. Semin Surg Oncol. 1993 Jul-Aug;9(4):298-304 [PMID: 8210909]
  8. Hepatology. 2000 Sep;32(3):679-80 [PMID: 10991637]
  9. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Oct;211(4):443-9 [PMID: 20822741]
  10. World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov 7;16(41):5257-62 [PMID: 21049561]
  11. Gut. 2002 Jun;50(6):881-5 [PMID: 12010894]
  12. Arch Surg. 2001 Aug;136(8):922-8 [PMID: 11485528]
  13. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Jun 15;19(12):3037-44 [PMID: 11408499]
  14. Int J Cancer. 2006 Oct 15;119(8):1946-52 [PMID: 16708389]
  15. Semin Liver Dis. 2010 Feb;30(1):61-74 [PMID: 20175034]
  16. World J Gastroenterol. 2002 Apr;8(2):193-9 [PMID: 11925590]
  17. Semin Liver Dis. 2005;25(2):171-80 [PMID: 15918146]
  18. Hepatology. 2011 May;53(5):1549-57 [PMID: 21520170]
  19. Ann Surg. 2003 Apr;237(4):536-43 [PMID: 12677151]
  20. Oncologist. 2010;15 Suppl 4:23-33 [PMID: 21115578]
  21. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Feb;26(2):340-7 [PMID: 21261725]
  22. Hepatol Res. 2007 Sep;37 Suppl 2:S101-5 [PMID: 17877468]
  23. Hepatology. 2000 Dec;32(6):1224-9 [PMID: 11093728]
  24. J Hepatol. 2009 Nov;51(5):890-7 [PMID: 19747749]
  25. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011 Jun;37(6):521-5 [PMID: 21531111]
  26. Semin Liver Dis. 1999;19(3):271-85 [PMID: 10518307]
  27. Ann Surg. 2005 Dec;242(6):814-22, discussion 822-3 [PMID: 16327491]
  28. Cancer. 2010 Nov 15;116(22):5336-9 [PMID: 20665503]
  29. J Hepatol. 2011 Jan;54(1):89-97 [PMID: 20970216]
  30. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Aug;18(8):2218-23 [PMID: 21336512]
  31. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005 Mar-Apr;55(2):74-108 [PMID: 15761078]
  32. Cancer. 2010 Jun 15;116(12):3006-14 [PMID: 20564406]
  33. Cancer. 1985 Aug 15;56(4):918-28 [PMID: 2990661]
  34. Cancer. 2008 Jan 15;112(2):352-61 [PMID: 18008352]
  35. Br J Surg. 2002 Mar;89(3):311-6 [PMID: 11872055]
  36. Liver Transpl. 2005 Sep;11(9):1086-92 [PMID: 16123959]
  37. Cancer. 2000 Aug 1;89(3):500-7 [PMID: 10931448]

MeSH Term

Aged
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Liver Neoplasms
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0>IIIsurvivalsystempatientsfactorsstagestumorvaluesTNM-7stageOSDFSIIsignificantIIIAencapsulationAST68U/Lbloodloss500mLAJCChepatocellularcarcinomaHCCstagingdifferencesp=0IIIBIIICaffectinglackAFP200ng/mLindependentBACKGROUND:aimstudyassessvalidity7theditionAmericanJointCommitteeCancerTNMundergoinghepatectomyMETHODS:Partialhepatectomiesperformed87919932005retrospectivelyreviewedClinicopathologicalsurgicaloutcomeoveralldisease-freeanalyzedevaluatepredictivevalueRESULTS:Accordingfive-yearstatisticallySubgroupanalysisrevealeddifference246105stratificationalsorevealCoxproportionalhazardmodelsanalysesidentifiedadditionalclinicopathologicalpatientsurvival:aspartateaminotransferaseaffectedwhereasserumα-fetoproteinimpairingStageincludingthrombussatellitelesionsruptureappearinfluencesubgroupCONCLUSIONS:terms5-yearratescapablestratifyingpost-hepatectomyunablestratifyLackprognosticlong-termEvaluationnewresectable

Similar Articles

Cited By