Conditional Discriminations by Preverbal Children in an Identity Matching-to-Sample Task.

Maria Stella C de Alcântara Gil, Thais Porlan de Oliveira, William J McIlvane
Author Information
  1. Maria Stella C de Alcântara Gil: Universidade Federal de São Carlos.

Abstract

This study sought to develop methodology for assessing whether children aged 16-21 months could learn to match stimuli on the basis of physical identity in conditional discrimination procedures of the type routinely used in stimulus equivalence research with older participants. The study was conducted in a private room at a daycare center for children and toddlers. The child and the research sat together on the floor facing an apparatus with two windows. Stimuli to be discriminated were toys especially designed to attract the child's attention and maintain continued interest. On simple discrimination and discrimination reversal trials that were programmed in initial training, S+ and S- toys were displayed within the two windows. When the child touched the window containing the toy defined as S+ on a given trial, s/he was allowed to manipulate/play with that toy. Selections of the S- toy ended the trial without a play opportunity. On subsequent identity matching-to-sample trials, the child was first allowed to manipulate a sample toy. Then, S+ (matching) and S- (nonmatching) comparison toys were displayed within the windows, and the selection consequences were the same as on simple discrimination trials. The study provides evidence that preverbal children can master simple and conditional discrimination performances via such procedures, perhaps setting the stage for subsequent studies aimed at establishing procedural control of the discrimination baselines needed to assess the stimulus equivalence potential of children in this age range.

References

  1. J Ment Defic Res. 1981 Mar;25(Pt 1):33-48 [PMID: 6454002]
  2. J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 Jul;80(1):131-57 [PMID: 13677612]
  3. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jul;74(1):101-14 [PMID: 10966098]
  4. Res Dev Disabil. 1998 Jul-Aug;19(4):347-79 [PMID: 9690280]
  5. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):5-22 [PMID: 7057129]
  6. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Jul;52(1):1-12 [PMID: 2769172]
  7. Psychol Rec. 2008 Jan 1;58(1):15-36 [PMID: 20186287]
  8. J Speech Hear Res. 1971 Mar;14(1):5-13 [PMID: 5550631]
  9. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Mar;73(2):177-93 [PMID: 10784008]
  10. Am J Ment Retard. 1990 Nov;95(3):283-96 [PMID: 2261161]
  11. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):185-241 [PMID: 16812780]
  12. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2001;28:101-38 [PMID: 11605362]
  13. J Exp Child Psychol. 1993 Oct;56(2):201-39 [PMID: 8245768]
  14. J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Jul;74(1):127-46 [PMID: 10966100]
  15. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Nov;60(3):571-85 [PMID: 8283149]

Grants

  1. P30 HD004147/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. P30 HD004147-37/NICHD NIH HHS
  3. R01 HD039816/NICHD NIH HHS
  4. R01 HD039816-05/NICHD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0discriminationchildrentoystudychildwindowstoyssimpletrialsS+S-identityconditionalproceduresstimulusequivalenceresearchtwodisplayedwithintrialallowedsubsequentsoughtdevelopmethodologyassessingwhetheraged16-21monthslearnmatchstimulibasisphysicaltyperoutinelyusedolderparticipantsconductedprivateroomdaycarecentertoddlerssattogetherfloorfacingapparatusStimulidiscriminatedespeciallydesignedattractchild'sattentionmaintaincontinuedinterestreversalprogrammedinitialtrainingtouchedwindowcontainingdefinedgivens/hemanipulate/playSelectionsendedwithoutplayopportunitymatching-to-samplefirstmanipulatesamplematchingnonmatchingcomparisonselectionconsequencesprovidesevidencepreverbalcanmasterperformancesviaperhapssettingstagestudiesaimedestablishingproceduralcontrolbaselinesneededassesspotentialagerangeConditionalDiscriminationsPreverbalChildrenIdentityMatching-to-SampleTask

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)