Inappropriate medication in a national sample of US elderly patients receiving home health care.

Yuhua Bao, Huibo Shao, Tara F Bishop, Bruce R Schackman, Martha L Bruce
Author Information
  1. Yuhua Bao: Department of Public Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, 402 E. 67th St., New York, NY 10065, USA. yub2003@med.cornell.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With substantial morbidity and functional impairment, older patients receiving home health care are especially susceptible to the adverse effects of unsafe or ineffective medications. Home health agencies’ medication review and reconciliation services, however, provide an added mechanism of medication safety that could offset this risk.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) among current elderly home health patients in the US.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis using data from the 2007 National Home and Hospice Care Survey.
SUBJECTS: 3,124 home health patients 65 years of age or older on at least one medication.
MAIN MEASURES: Prevalence and classification of PIM use and the association between PIM use and patient and home health agency characteristics.Key Results In 2007, 38% (95% CI: 36-41) of elderly home health patients were taking at least one PIM. Polypharmacy was associated with an increased risk of PIM use; admission to home health care from a nursing home or other sub-acute facility (compared to admission from the community) and a payment source other than Medicare or Medicaid were associated with a decreased risk of PIM use.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of PIM use in older home health patients is high despite potential mechanisms for improved safety. Policies to improve the review and reconciliation processes within home health agencies and to improve physician-home health clinician collaboration are likely needed to lower the prevalence of PIM use in older home health patients.

References

  1. Clin Ther. 2005 Jan;27(1):88-99 [PMID: 15763610]
  2. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2006 Jun;4(2):134-43 [PMID: 16860260]
  3. Arch Intern Med. 2004 Feb 9;164(3):305-12 [PMID: 14769626]
  4. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Jun;49(6):719-24 [PMID: 11454109]
  5. Health Serv Res. 2004 Oct;39(5):1257-76 [PMID: 15333108]
  6. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Dec 4;147(11):755-65 [PMID: 18056659]
  7. Home Healthc Nurse. 2010 Feb;28(2):105-14 [PMID: 20147805]
  8. Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Mar;17(3):231-7 [PMID: 20370754]
  9. J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Apr;17(4):253-61 [PMID: 11972721]
  10. JAMA. 2005 Mar 16;293(11):1348-58 [PMID: 15769968]
  11. Arch Intern Med. 2003 Dec 8-22;163(22):2716-24 [PMID: 14662625]
  12. Home Care Provid. 1998 Apr;3(2):100-3, 110 [PMID: 9611523]
  13. Arch Intern Med. 1997 Jul 28;157(14):1531-6 [PMID: 9236554]
  14. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2009 Apr;7(2):84-92 [PMID: 19447361]

Grants

  1. K01 MH090087/NIMH NIH HHS
  2. R03MH085834/NIMH NIH HHS
  3. R01 MH082425/NIMH NIH HHS
  4. P30 MH085943/NIMH NIH HHS
  5. K01MH090087/NIMH NIH HHS
  6. R03 MH085834/NIMH NIH HHS
  7. P30MH085943/NIMH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cross-Sectional Studies
Drug Utilization
Female
Home Care Services
Homes for the Aged
Humans
Male
Medication Errors
Polypharmacy
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
Retrospective Studies
United States

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthhomepatientsPIMuseoldermedicationcareriskprevalenceelderlyreceivingmedicationsHomereviewreconciliationsafetyUS2007leastoneassociatedadmissionimproveBACKGROUND:substantialmorbidityfunctionalimpairmentespeciallysusceptibleadverseeffectsunsafeineffectiveagencies’serviceshoweverprovideaddedmechanismoffsetOBJECTIVE:estimatepotentiallyinappropriatePIMsamongcurrentDESIGN:Cross-sectionalanalysisusingdataNationalHospiceCareSurveySUBJECTS:312465yearsageMAINMEASURES:PrevalenceclassificationassociationpatientagencycharacteristicsKeyResults38%95%CI:36-41takingPolypharmacyincreasednursingsub-acutefacilitycomparedcommunitypaymentsourceMedicareMedicaiddecreasedCONCLUSIONS:highdespitepotentialmechanismsimprovedPoliciesprocesseswithinagenciesphysician-homecliniciancollaborationlikelyneededlowerInappropriatenationalsample

Similar Articles

Cited By