Contributions of Philip Teitelbaum to affective neuroscience.

Kent C Berridge
Author Information
  1. Kent C Berridge: Department of Psychology, 530 Church Street, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1043, USA. Berridge@umich.edu

Abstract

As part of a festschrift issue for Philip Teitelbaum, I offer here the thesis that Teitelbaum deserves to be viewed as an important forefather to the contemporary field of affective neuroscience (which studies motivation, emotion and affect in the brain). Teitelbaum's groundbreaking analyses of motivation deficits induced by lateral hypothalamic damage, of roles of food palatability in revealing residual function, and of recovery of 'lost' functions helped shape modern understanding of how motivation circuits operate within the brain. His redefinition of the minimum requirement for identifying motivation raised the conceptual bar for thinking about the topic among behavioral neuroscientists. His meticulous analyses of patterned stages induced by brain manipulations, life development and clinical disorders added new dimensions to our appreciation of how brain systems work. His steadfast highlighting of integrative functions and behavioral complexity helped provide a healthy functionalist counterbalance to reductionist trends in science of the late 20th century. In short, Philip Teitelbaum can be seen to have made remarkable contributions to several domains of psychology and neuroscience, including affective neuroscience.

References

  1. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1978 Aug;92(4):720-41 [PMID: 690292]
  2. Dev Psychobiol. 1985 Nov;18(6):529-44 [PMID: 4092840]
  3. Science. 1954 Nov 26;120(3126):894-5 [PMID: 13216188]
  4. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Apr;191(3):391-431 [PMID: 17072591]
  5. J Neurosci. 2005 Dec 14;25(50):11777-86 [PMID: 16354936]
  6. J Neurosci. 2007 Feb 14;27(7):1594-605 [PMID: 17301168]
  7. Physiol Behav. 2004 Apr;81(2):179-209 [PMID: 15159167]
  8. Behav Brain Res. 2009 Jan 23;196(2):155-67 [PMID: 18955088]
  9. Am J Psychol. 1987 Fall-Winter;100(3-4):567-86 [PMID: 3322057]
  10. Psychol Rev. 1970 Jan;77(1):16-31 [PMID: 4908030]
  11. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1995 Apr;5(2):217-24 [PMID: 7620310]
  12. Science. 1962 Feb 2;135(3501):375-7 [PMID: 13907995]
  13. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1971;367:95-122 [PMID: 4332694]
  14. Brain Res. 1978 Mar 24;143(2):263-79 [PMID: 630409]
  15. Cereb Cortex. 2003 Oct;13(10):1064-71 [PMID: 12967923]
  16. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Oct 12;363(1507):3137-46 [PMID: 18640920]
  17. Psychol Rev. 1960 Jul;67:253-68 [PMID: 14432499]
  18. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2007 Nov;32(11):2267-78 [PMID: 17406653]
  19. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Nov;13(11):479-87 [PMID: 19782634]
  20. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Nov 10;95(23):13982-7 [PMID: 9811912]
  21. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(2):126-47 [PMID: 16183121]
  22. Brain Res. 1979 Mar 23;164:237-67 [PMID: 570872]
  23. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1969 Apr;67(4):430-41 [PMID: 5787394]
  24. J Neurophysiol. 2006 Nov;96(5):2399-409 [PMID: 16885520]
  25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Aug 10;101(32):11909-14 [PMID: 15282371]
  26. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1974 Nov;87(5):808-30 [PMID: 4430749]
  27. Soc Cogn. 2008 Oct 1;26(5):621-646 [PMID: 20198128]
  28. Symp Oral Sens Percept. 1973;(4):254-78 [PMID: 4612820]
  29. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1973 May;83(2):184-97 [PMID: 4706589]
  30. Science. 1971 Sep 17;173(4002):1103-7 [PMID: 5098954]
  31. Physiol Behav. 1978 Nov;21(5):817-20 [PMID: 569874]
  32. Psychol Rev. 1962 Mar;69:74-90 [PMID: 13920110]
  33. Science. 1964 Sep 25;145(3639):1456-8 [PMID: 14172646]
  34. Am J Physiol. 1965 Feb;208:334-42 [PMID: 14259970]
  35. Brain Res. 1980 Nov 10;201(1):143-72 [PMID: 7191346]
  36. J Neurobiol. 1992 Dec;23(10):1529-56 [PMID: 1487748]
  37. Neuroscience. 1984 May;12(1):225-40 [PMID: 6462446]
  38. J Comp Neurol. 2005 Dec 5;493(1):122-31 [PMID: 16254987]
  39. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Sep;6(9):691-702 [PMID: 16136173]
  40. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 24;107(34):15235-9 [PMID: 20696892]
  41. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1972 Jan;154(1):3-18 [PMID: 5007439]
  42. Behav Neurosci. 1988 Oct;102(5):760-77 [PMID: 3196443]
  43. J Neurosci. 2009 May 20;29(20):6500-13 [PMID: 19458221]
  44. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008 Aug;199(3):457-80 [PMID: 18311558]
  45. Brain Res. 1973 May 30;55(1):229-33 [PMID: 4514582]
  46. Psychol Rev. 1966 Jan;73(1):59-86 [PMID: 5324568]
  47. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1954 Dec;47(6):419-27 [PMID: 13233369]
  48. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2001 Jan;25(1):53-74 [PMID: 11166078]
  49. Physiol Behav. 1987;39(1):127-33 [PMID: 3562646]
  50. Neuroscience. 1985 Mar;14(3):783-98 [PMID: 2986045]
  51. Neurosci Res Program Bull. 1974 Jun;12(2):255-60 [PMID: 4858684]
  52. Psychol Rev. 1994 Apr;101(2):312-7 [PMID: 8022961]
  53. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1979 Jun;93(3):446-66 [PMID: 479393]
  54. Brain Res. 1993 Oct 8;624(1-2):1-10 [PMID: 8252379]
  55. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jul 5;108(27):E255-64 [PMID: 21670308]
  56. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1993 Sep-Dec;18(3):247-91 [PMID: 8401595]
  57. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1969 May 15;157(2):849-60 [PMID: 5255642]
  58. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Nov;78(11):7226-9 [PMID: 6947283]
  59. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1996;20(1):1-25 [PMID: 8622814]
  60. J Neurosci. 2005 Sep 21;25(38):8637-49 [PMID: 16177031]
  61. PLoS One. 2010 Jun 18;5(6):e11223 [PMID: 20585461]
  62. Behav Neurosci. 1984 Aug;98(4):739-42 [PMID: 6466446]

Grants

  1. R01 DA015188-09/NIDA NIH HHS
  2. R01 MH063649-10/NIMH NIH HHS
  3. MH63649/NIMH NIH HHS
  4. DA015188/NIDA NIH HHS
  5. R01 MH063649/NIMH NIH HHS
  6. R01 DA015188/NIDA NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Affect
Animals
Behavior
Behavior, Animal
Brain
Dopamine
Globus Pallidus
History, 20th Century
History, 21st Century
Humans
Hypothalamus
Limbic System
Motivation
Neurosciences
Pleasure
Psychophysiology
Rats
Recovery of Function

Chemicals

Dopamine

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0TeitelbaumneurosciencemotivationbrainPhilipaffectiveanalysesinducedfunctionshelpedbehavioralpartfestschriftissueofferthesisdeservesviewedimportantforefathercontemporaryfieldstudiesemotionaffectTeitelbaum'sgroundbreakingdeficitslateralhypothalamicdamagerolesfoodpalatabilityrevealingresidualfunctionrecovery'lost'shapemodernunderstandingcircuitsoperatewithinredefinitionminimumrequirementidentifyingraisedconceptualbarthinkingtopicamongneuroscientistsmeticulouspatternedstagesmanipulationslifedevelopmentclinicaldisordersaddednewdimensionsappreciationsystemsworksteadfasthighlightingintegrativecomplexityprovidehealthyfunctionalistcounterbalancereductionisttrendssciencelate20thcenturyshortcanseenmaderemarkablecontributionsseveraldomainspsychologyincludingContributions

Similar Articles

Cited By