Determinants of mammography in women with intellectual disabilities.

Joanne E Wilkinson, Emily Lauer, Karen M Freund, Amy K Rosen
Author Information
  1. Joanne E Wilkinson: Department of Family Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA 02118, USA. Joanne.Wilkinson@bmc.org

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with intellectual disabilities have the same rate of breast cancer as other women but are less likely to undergo screening mammography. Characteristics associated with mammography for women with intellectual disabilities in the United States are unknown.
METHODS: This study was based on a secondary data analysis of the Massachusetts Department of Developmental Services database, comparing women who had a mammogram within 2 years with women who had not on variables related to the ecological model. Bivariate analyses, logistic regression, and assessment of interactions were performed.
RESULTS: The study sample's (n = 2907) mean age was 54.7 years; 58% lived in 24-hour residential settings, 52% received nursing health coordination, and more than 25% had clinical examination needs (eg, sedation). Residential setting, health coordination, and recent influenza vaccination were all associated with mammography. Having a guardian, higher level of activities of daily living needs, and examination needs (requiring sedation or limited wait time for examinations) were associated with lower rates. Interactions between health coordination and examination needs confirmed the potential of the nurse to ameliorate barriers to mammography.
CONCLUSION: Several system-level variables were significantly associated with mammography and, in some cases, seemed to ameliorate intrapersonal/behavioral barriers to mammography. Community agencies caring for intellectually disabled women have potential to impact mammography rates by using health coordination.

References

  1. J Am Board Fam Med. 2008 May-Jun;21(3):215-22 [PMID: 18467533]
  2. Obes Res. 2005 Feb;13(2):342-9 [PMID: 15800293]
  3. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2011 May;20(3):412-20 [PMID: 20825462]
  4. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997;(22):119-24 [PMID: 9709287]
  5. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006 Jun;15(5):531-41 [PMID: 16796480]
  6. Cancer Causes Control. 2004 Dec;15(10):1021-5 [PMID: 15801486]
  7. Prev Med. 2003 Nov;37(5):507-12 [PMID: 14572435]
  8. JAMA. 2005 Jul 27;294(4):473-81 [PMID: 16046654]
  9. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 08;(4):CD007492 [PMID: 18843752]
  10. Health Serv Res. 2010 Oct;45(5 Pt 1):1376-89 [PMID: 20609018]
  11. Ann Fam Med. 2010 Mar-Apr;8(2):108-16 [PMID: 20212297]
  12. BMJ. 2002 May 11;324(7346):1155 [PMID: 12003897]
  13. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2010 Aug;48(4):271-7 [PMID: 20722477]
  14. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009 Nov;53(11):887-97 [PMID: 19732278]
  15. Ment Retard. 2005 Feb;43(1):1-10 [PMID: 15628929]
  16. Aust Fam Physician. 2009 Jan-Feb;38(1-2):10-4 [PMID: 19283229]
  17. Lancet. 2002 Mar 23;359(9311):1019-25 [PMID: 11937181]
  18. Health Educ Q. 1988 Winter;15(4):351-77 [PMID: 3068205]
  19. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2001 Aug;45(Pt 4):300-7 [PMID: 11489051]
  20. Soc Work Public Health. 2010 May;25(3):368-86 [PMID: 20446182]
  21. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2010 Sep;14(4):328-36 [PMID: 20493767]
  22. Ment Retard. 1993 Apr;31(2):105-10 [PMID: 8479328]
  23. Ann Fam Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;9(2):142-7 [PMID: 21403141]
  24. J Am Board Fam Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;20(4):399-407 [PMID: 17615421]
  25. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2001 Jun;45(Pt 3):253-7 [PMID: 11422650]

Grants

  1. K07 CA134547/NCI NIH HHS
  2. K07 CA134547-01A1/NCI NIH HHS
  3. K07CA134547/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Activities of Daily Living
Adult
Aged
Breast Neoplasms
Early Detection of Cancer
Female
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Intellectual Disability
Logistic Models
Mammography
Massachusetts
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Patient-Centered Care
Residential Facilities

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0mammographywomenassociatedhealthcoordinationneedsintellectualdisabilitiesexaminationstudyyearsvariablessedationratespotentialamelioratebarriersBACKGROUND:WomenratebreastcancerlesslikelyundergoscreeningCharacteristicsUnitedStatesunknownMETHODS:basedsecondarydataanalysisMassachusettsDepartmentDevelopmentalServicesdatabasecomparingmammogramwithin2relatedecologicalmodelBivariateanalyseslogisticregressionassessmentinteractionsperformedRESULTS:sample'sn=2907meanage54758%lived24-hourresidentialsettings52%receivednursing25%clinicalegResidentialsettingrecentinfluenzavaccinationguardianhigherlevelactivitiesdailylivingrequiringlimitedwaittimeexaminationslowerInteractionsconfirmednurseCONCLUSION:Severalsystem-levelsignificantlycasesseemedintrapersonal/behavioralCommunityagenciescaringintellectuallydisabledimpactusingDeterminants

Similar Articles

Cited By