Decoding the internal focus of attention.

Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock, Bradley R Postle
Author Information
  1. Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock: Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA. jalewpea@princeton.edu

Abstract

The significance of the recent introduction to cognitive neuroscience of multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) is that, unlike univariate approaches which are limited to identifying magnitudes of activity in localized parts of the brain, it affords the detection and characterization of patterns of activity distributed within and across multiple brain regions. This technique supports stronger inferences because it captures neural representations that have markedly higher selectivity than do univariate activation peaks. Recently, we used MVPA to assess the neural consequences of dissociating the internal focus of attention from short-term memory (STM), finding that the information represented in delay-period activity corresponds only to the former (Lewis-Peacock, Drysdale, Oberauer, & Postle, in press). Here we report several additional analyses of these data in which we directly compared the results generated by MVPA vs. those generated by univariate analyses. The sensitivity of MVPA to subtle variations in patterns of distributed brain activity revealed a novel insight: although overall activity remains elevated in category-selective brain regions corresponding to unattended STM items, the multivariate patterns of activity within these regions reflect the representation of a different category, i.e., the one that is currently being attended to. In addition, MVPA was able to dissociate attended from unattended STM items in brain regions whose univariate activity did not appear to be sensitive to the task. These findings highlight the fallacy of the assumption of homogeneity of representation within putative category-selective regions. They affirm the view that neural representations in STM are highly distributed and overlapping, and they demonstrate the necessity of multivariate analysis for dissociating such representations.

References

  1. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004 Mar;4(1):10-9 [PMID: 15259886]
  2. J Neurophysiol. 1971 May;34(3):337-47 [PMID: 4997822]
  3. J Neurosci. 2009 Aug 26;29(34):10573-81 [PMID: 19710310]
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 7;103(10):3863-8 [PMID: 16537458]
  5. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Apr;4(4):310-22 [PMID: 12671647]
  6. Science. 1971 Aug 13;173(3997):652-4 [PMID: 4998337]
  7. J Neurosci. 2008 Aug 27;28(35):8765-71 [PMID: 18753378]
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 16;105(37):14228-33 [PMID: 18757724]
  9. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:193-224 [PMID: 17854286]
  10. Psychol Rev. 1965 Mar;72:89-104 [PMID: 14282677]
  11. Neuroimage. 2009 Mar;45(1 Suppl):S199-209 [PMID: 19070668]
  12. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):992-998 [PMID: 21281653]
  13. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Dec;7(12):547-52 [PMID: 14643371]
  14. Psychol Bull. 2007 Nov;133(6):1038-66 [PMID: 17967093]
  15. J Neurosci. 2006 Aug 9;26(32):8352-9 [PMID: 16899730]
  16. Neuroimage. 2003 Jun;19(2 Pt 1):261-70 [PMID: 12814577]
  17. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 May;20(5):762-78 [PMID: 18201133]
  18. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Jul;31(4):714-28 [PMID: 16060775]
  19. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Jul;18(7):1087-97 [PMID: 16839283]
  20. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Jul;27(4):948-57 [PMID: 11486928]
  21. Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Mar;9(1):59-79 [PMID: 12026954]
  22. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 May;28(3):411-21 [PMID: 12018494]
  23. Psychol Bull. 1988 Sep;104(2):163-91 [PMID: 3054993]
  24. Hippocampus. 2006;16(7):604-16 [PMID: 16770797]
  25. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Jul;7(7):523-34 [PMID: 16791142]
  26. Psychol Rev. 2009 Jan;116(1):129-56 [PMID: 19159151]
  27. J Neurosci. 2009 Jan 14;29(2):508-16 [PMID: 19144851]
  28. Nature. 1997 Nov 20;390(6657):279-81 [PMID: 9384378]
  29. J Neurosci. 2006 Apr 26;26(17):4596-601 [PMID: 16641239]
  30. Psychol Sci. 2009 Feb;20(2):207-14 [PMID: 19170936]
  31. Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Feb;24(1):87-114; discussion 114-85 [PMID: 11515286]
  32. Psychophysiology. 2005 Nov;42(6):643-53 [PMID: 16364060]
  33. Psychol Rev. 2008 Oct;115(4):893-912 [PMID: 18954208]
  34. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 18;104(51):20600-5 [PMID: 18077383]
  35. J Cogn Neurosci. 1999 Nov;11(6):585-97 [PMID: 10601740]
  36. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998 Mar-Apr;22(2):324-33 [PMID: 9530404]
  37. Science. 2001 Sep 28;293(5539):2425-30 [PMID: 11577229]
  38. J Neurosci. 2010 Oct 13;30(41):13624-9 [PMID: 20943903]
  39. Neuroreport. 1999 Sep 29;10(14):2945-50 [PMID: 10549802]
  40. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Sep;10(9):424-30 [PMID: 16899397]
  41. Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 15;54(2):1540-8 [PMID: 20832478]
  42. Nat Neurosci. 2007 Jun;10(6):685-6 [PMID: 17486103]
  43. Neuroimage. 1995 Sep;2(3):173-81 [PMID: 9343600]
  44. Psychol Rev. 2006 Apr;113(2):201-33 [PMID: 16637760]
  45. Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Sep;8(3):568-78 [PMID: 11700909]
  46. Neuroscience. 2006 Apr 28;139(1):23-38 [PMID: 16324795]
  47. Psychol Rev. 1995 Apr;102(2):211-45 [PMID: 7740089]
  48. Learn Mem. 2011 Apr 18;18(5):301-5 [PMID: 21502337]
  49. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Sep;7(9):415-423 [PMID: 12963473]
  50. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Jul 1;15(5):704-17 [PMID: 12965044]
  51. Neuroimage. 2006 Apr 15;30(3):950-62 [PMID: 16413797]
  52. J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Jan;24(1):61-79 [PMID: 21955164]
  53. Nature. 2009 Apr 2;458(7238):632-5 [PMID: 19225460]

Grants

  1. F31 MH085444/NIMH NIH HHS
  2. R01 MH064498-09/NIMH NIH HHS
  3. F31 MH085444-01A1/NIMH NIH HHS
  4. R01 MH064498/NIMH NIH HHS
  5. MH085444/NIMH NIH HHS
  6. MH064498/NIMH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Attention
Brain
Brain Mapping
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Memory, Short-Term
Neuropsychological Tests
Reaction Time
Visual Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0activityMVPAbrainregionsunivariateSTMmultivariatepatternsdistributedwithinneuralrepresentationsanalysisdissociatinginternalfocusattentionanalysesgeneratedcategory-selectiveunattendeditemsrepresentationattendedsignificancerecentintroductioncognitiveneurosciencepatternunlikeapproacheslimitedidentifyingmagnitudeslocalizedpartsaffordsdetectioncharacterizationacrossmultipletechniquesupportsstrongerinferencescapturesmarkedlyhigherselectivityactivationpeaksRecentlyusedassessconsequencesshort-termmemoryfindinginformationrepresenteddelay-periodcorrespondsformerLewis-PeacockDrysdaleOberauer&Postlepressreportseveraladditionaldatadirectlycomparedresultsvssensitivitysubtlevariationsrevealednovelinsight:althoughoverallremainselevatedcorrespondingreflectdifferentcategoryieonecurrentlyadditionabledissociatewhoseappearsensitivetaskfindingshighlightfallacyassumptionhomogeneityputativeaffirmviewhighlyoverlappingdemonstratenecessityDecoding

Similar Articles

Cited By