Working memory modulates the perception of time.

Yi Pan, Qian-Ying Luo
Author Information
  1. Yi Pan: Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, 310036, China. panyirich@zju.edu.cn

Abstract

Recent research has indicated that reentrant feedback from the contents of working memory can enhance neural representations and the perceptual strengths of matching stimuli in the visual field. However, whether the contents of working memory can also distort conscious experiences of perception remains unclear. Our present results show that the durations of perceptual stimuli matching the nontemporal representations in working memory tend to be perceived as longer than those of mismatching stimuli. This is the first demonstration that working memory can lead to distortions of time perception. Our findings are consistent with the ideas that the perceived duration of a stimulus depends on the magnitude of the neural responses to that stimulus in visual cortex and that there is a common system for representing both temporal and nontemporal magnitudes. We conclude that top-down modulation from the nontemporal contents of working memory distorts the perceptual experience of temporal duration.

References

  1. Percept Psychophys. 2007 Aug;69(6):952-7 [PMID: 18018976]
  2. Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Dec;1(4):476-90 [PMID: 24203555]
  3. J Vis. 2007 Jul 06;7(10):2.1-5 [PMID: 17997671]
  4. J Vis. 2008 Dec 22;8(16):11.1-6 [PMID: 19146277]
  5. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:193-222 [PMID: 7605061]
  6. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Sep;12(9):342-8 [PMID: 18693131]
  7. Science. 1994 Jan 28;263(5146):520-2 [PMID: 8290960]
  8. J Vis. 2008 May 23;8(5):11.1-13 [PMID: 18842082]
  9. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Nov;73(8):2425-33 [PMID: 21837542]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 23;104(43):17186-91 [PMID: 17940037]
  11. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Jul 12;364(1525):1841-51 [PMID: 19487187]
  12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 21;103(12):4789-92 [PMID: 16537358]
  13. Mem Cognit. 1994 Nov;22(6):673-86 [PMID: 7808276]
  14. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Feb;37(1):303-13 [PMID: 20731508]
  15. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 May;73(4):996-1002 [PMID: 21287315]
  16. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Nov;7(11):483-8 [PMID: 14585444]
  17. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Oct;37(5):1617-27 [PMID: 21517218]
  18. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jun;62(6):1123-31 [PMID: 19142832]
  19. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Mar;36(2):441-56 [PMID: 20192541]
  20. Cognition. 2009 Oct;113(1):117-22 [PMID: 19640515]
  21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 26;93(24):13494-9 [PMID: 8942962]
  22. Nature. 1993 May 27;363(6427):345-7 [PMID: 8497317]

MeSH Term

Acoustic Stimulation
Auditory Perception
Humans
Memory, Short-Term
Photic Stimulation
Time Perception
Visual Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0memoryworkingcontentscanperceptualstimuliperceptionnontemporalneuralrepresentationsmatchingvisualperceivedtimedurationstimulustemporalRecentresearchindicatedreentrantfeedbackenhancestrengthsfieldHoweverwhetheralsodistortconsciousexperiencesremainsunclearpresentresultsshowdurationstendlongermismatchingfirstdemonstrationleaddistortionsfindingsconsistentideasdependsmagnituderesponsescortexcommonsystemrepresentingmagnitudesconcludetop-downmodulationdistortsexperienceWorkingmodulates

Similar Articles

Cited By