An improved border detection in dermoscopy images for density based clustering.

Sait Suer, Sinan Kockara, Mutlu Mete
Author Information
  1. Sait Suer: University of Central Arkansas, 201 Donaghey Ave, Conway, 72035 AR, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dermoscopy is one of the major imaging modalities used in the diagnosis of melanoma and other pigmented skin lesions. In current practice, dermatologists determine lesion area by manually drawing lesion borders. Therefore, automated assessment tools for dermoscopy images have become an important research field mainly because of inter- and intra-observer variations in human interpretation. One of the most important steps in dermoscopy image analysis is automated detection of lesion borders. To our knowledge, in our 2010 study we achieved one of the highest accuracy rates in the automated lesion border detection field by using modified density based clustering algorithm. In the previous study, we proposed a novel method which removes redundant computations in well-known spatial density based clustering algorithm, DBSCAN; thus, in turn it speeds up clustering process considerably.
FINDINGS: Our previous study was heavily dependent on the pre-processing step which creates a binary image from original image. In this study, we embed a new distance measure to the existing algorithm. This provides twofold benefits. First, since new approach removes pre-processing step, it directly works on color images instead of binary ones. Thus, very important color information is not lost. Second, accuracy of delineated lesion borders is improved on 75% of 100 dermoscopy image dataset.
CONCLUSION: Previous and improved methods are tested within the same dermoscopy dataset along with the same set of dermatologist drawn ground truth images. Results revealed that the improved method directly works on color images without any pre-processing and generates more accurate results than existing method.

References

  1. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2011 Mar;35(2):128-36 [PMID: 20800995]
  2. Acta Derm Venereol. 1999 Jul;79(4):301-4 [PMID: 10429989]
  3. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2009 Mar;33(2):148-53 [PMID: 19121917]
  4. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008 Jan;55(1):157-61 [PMID: 18232357]
  5. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 07;11 Suppl 6:S26 [PMID: 20946610]
  6. Pattern Recognit. 2009 Jun;42(6):1093-1103 [PMID: 20161324]
  7. CA Cancer J Clin. 2000 Jul-Aug;50(4):215-36; quiz 237-40 [PMID: 10986965]
  8. Skin Res Technol. 2008 Aug;14(3):347-53 [PMID: 19159382]
  9. Arch Dermatol. 1995 Mar;131(3):286-91 [PMID: 7887657]
  10. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):277-300 [PMID: 20610543]

MeSH Term

Algorithms
Cluster Analysis
Dermoscopy
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Melanoma
Observer Variation
Pattern Recognition, Automated
Skin Neoplasms

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0lesiondermoscopyimagesimagestudyclusteringimprovedbordersautomatedimportantdetectiondensitybasedalgorithmmethodpre-processingcoloronefieldaccuracyborderpreviousremovesstepbinarynewexistingdirectlyworksdatasetBACKGROUND:DermoscopymajorimagingmodalitiesuseddiagnosismelanomapigmentedskinlesionscurrentpracticedermatologistsdetermineareamanuallydrawingThereforeassessmenttoolsbecomeresearchmainlyinter-intra-observervariationshumaninterpretationOnestepsanalysisknowledge2010achievedhighestratesusingmodifiedproposednovelredundantcomputationswell-knownspatialDBSCANthusturnspeedsprocessconsiderablyFINDINGS:heavilydependentcreatesoriginalembeddistancemeasureprovidestwofoldbenefitsFirstsinceapproachinsteadonesThusinformationlostSeconddelineated75%100CONCLUSION:PreviousmethodstestedwithinalongsetdermatologistdrawngroundtruthResultsrevealedwithoutgeneratesaccurateresults

Similar Articles

Cited By