A microfluidic device for the automated derivatization of free fatty acids to fatty acid methyl esters.

Cindy T Duong, Michael G Roper
Author Information
  1. Cindy T Duong: Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Florida State University, 95 Chieftain Way, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.

Abstract

Free fatty acid (FFA) compositions are examined in feedstock for biodiesel production, as source-specific markers in soil, and because of their role in cellular signaling. However, sample preparation of FFAs for gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis can be time and labor intensive. Therefore, to increase sample preparation throughput, a glass microfluidic device was developed to automate derivatization of FFAs to fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs). FFAs were delivered to one input of the device and methanolic-HCl was delivered to a second input. FAME products were produced as the reagents traversed a 29 μL reaction channel held at 55 °C. A Design of Experiment protocol was used to determine the combination of derivatization time (T(der)) and ratio of methanolic-HCl:FFA (R(der)) that maximized the derivatization efficiencies of tridecanoic acid and stearic acid to their methyl ester forms. The combination of T(der) = 0.8 min and R(der) = 4.9 that produced optimal derivatization conditions for both FFAs within a 5 min total sample preparation time was determined. This combination of T(der) and R(der) was used to derivatize 12 FFAs with a range of derivatization efficiencies from 18% to 93% with efficiencies of 61% for tridecanoic acid and 84% for stearic acid. As compared to a conventional macroscale derivatization of FFA to FAME, the microfluidic device decreased the volume of methanolic-HCl and FFA by 20- and 1300-fold, respectively. The developed microfluidic device can be used for automated preparation of FAMEs to analyze the FFA compositions of volume-limited samples.

References

  1. Genes Nutr. 2007 Oct;2(1):39-40 [PMID: 18850137]
  2. J Org Chem. 2010 Aug 20;75(16):5619-26 [PMID: 20666502]
  3. Obes Res. 2005 Dec;13(12):2058-65 [PMID: 16421338]
  4. Lipids. 2008 Feb;43(2):171-80 [PMID: 18084789]
  5. J Chromatogr A. 2010 Jul 9;1217(28):4743-8 [PMID: 20730040]
  6. Ann Nutr Metab. 2009;54(4):258-67 [PMID: 19641303]
  7. Science. 2004 May 28;304(5675):1305-8 [PMID: 15166375]
  8. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2007;46(30):5704-8 [PMID: 17579912]
  9. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2010 Sep 17;49(39):7076-80 [PMID: 20726027]
  10. Diabetologia. 2010 May;53(5):850-7 [PMID: 20127308]
  11. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2009 May;394(1):313-9 [PMID: 19189083]
  12. Anal Chem. 2002 Apr 1;74(7):1565-71 [PMID: 12033246]
  13. J Lipid Res. 2010 Mar;51(3):635-40 [PMID: 19759389]

Grants

  1. R01 DK080714/NIDDK NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Biofuels
Esters
Fatty Acids, Nonesterified
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
Methylation
Microfluidic Analytical Techniques
Stearic Acids

Chemicals

Biofuels
Esters
Fatty Acids, Nonesterified
Stearic Acids
stearic acid

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0acidderivatizationderFFAsdevicefattyFFApreparationmicrofluidicsampletimemethylusedcombinationTRefficienciescompositionscandevelopedestersFAMEsdeliveredinputmethanolic-HClFAMEproducedtridecanoicstearic=minautomatedFreeexaminedfeedstockbiodieselproductionsource-specificmarkerssoilrolecellularsignalingHowevergaschromatography-massspectrometryGC-MSanalysislaborintensiveThereforeincreasethroughputglassautomateonesecondproductsreagentstraversed29μLreactionchannelheld55°CDesignExperimentprotocoldetermineratiomethanolic-HCl:FFAmaximizedesterforms0849optimalconditionswithin5totaldeterminedderivatize12range18%93%61%84%comparedconventionalmacroscaledecreasedvolume20-1300-foldrespectivelyanalyzevolume-limitedsamplesfreeacids

Similar Articles

Cited By