The roles of hydraulic and carbon stress in a widespread climate-induced forest die-off.

William R L Anderegg, Joseph A Berry, Duncan D Smith, John S Sperry, Leander D L Anderegg, Christopher B Field
Author Information
  1. William R L Anderegg: Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. anderegg@stanford.edu

Abstract

Forest ecosystems store approximately 45% of the carbon found in terrestrial ecosystems, but they are sensitive to climate-induced dieback. Forest die-off constitutes a large uncertainty in projections of climate impacts on terrestrial ecosystems, climate-ecosystem interactions, and carbon-cycle feedbacks. Current understanding of the physiological mechanisms mediating climate-induced forest mortality limits the ability to model or project these threshold events. We report here a direct and in situ study of the mechanisms underlying recent widespread and climate-induced trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) forest mortality in western North America. We find substantial evidence of hydraulic failure of roots and branches linked to landscape patterns of canopy and root mortality in this species. On the contrary, we find no evidence that drought stress led to depletion of carbohydrate reserves. Our results illuminate proximate mechanisms underpinning recent aspen forest mortality and provide guidance for understanding and projecting forest die-offs under climate change.

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 30;106(26):E68; author reply e69 [PMID: 19506239]
  2. Science. 2011 Feb 4;331(6017):554 [PMID: 21292971]
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 18;102(42):15144-8 [PMID: 16217022]
  4. Nature. 2008 Apr 24;452(7190):987-90 [PMID: 18432244]
  5. Plant Physiol. 2001 Feb;125(2):779-86 [PMID: 11161035]
  6. Physiol Plant. 2010 Nov;140(3):246-57 [PMID: 20618763]
  7. New Phytol. 2010 Apr;186(2):274-81 [PMID: 20409184]
  8. New Phytol. 2010 Apr;186(2):264-6 [PMID: 20409181]
  9. New Phytol. 2008;178(4):719-739 [PMID: 18422905]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 28;106(17):7063-6 [PMID: 19365070]
  11. New Phytol. 2011 Jul;191(1):15-18 [PMID: 21631506]
  12. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Mar 29;359(1443):477-91 [PMID: 15212097]
  13. Science. 2008 Jun 13;320(5882):1444-9 [PMID: 18556546]
  14. New Phytol. 2011 May;190(3):750-9 [PMID: 21261625]
  15. Sci Total Environ. 2000 Nov 15;262(3):201-4 [PMID: 11087026]
  16. Tree Physiol. 2011 Mar;31(3):250-7 [PMID: 21444372]
  17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 5;105(5):1551-5 [PMID: 18230736]
  18. Science. 2009 Mar 6;323(5919):1344-7 [PMID: 19265020]
  19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 22;106(38):E106; author reply E107 [PMID: 19805249]

MeSH Term

Biomass
Carbon
Climate
Droughts
Plant Roots
Populus
Pressure
Rain
Stress, Physiological
Temperature
Trees
Xylem

Chemicals

Carbon

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0forestclimate-inducedmortalityecosystemsmechanismsForestcarbonterrestrialdie-offclimateunderstandingrecentwidespreadaspenfindevidencehydraulicstressstoreapproximately45%foundsensitivediebackconstituteslargeuncertaintyprojectionsimpactsclimate-ecosysteminteractionscarbon-cyclefeedbacksCurrentphysiologicalmediatinglimitsabilitymodelprojectthresholdeventsreportdirectsitustudyunderlyingtremblingPopulustremuloideswesternNorthAmericasubstantialfailurerootsbrancheslinkedlandscapepatternscanopyrootspeciescontrarydroughtleddepletioncarbohydratereservesresultsilluminateproximateunderpinningprovideguidanceprojectingdie-offschangeroles

Similar Articles

Cited By (93)