A framework and standardized methodology for developing minimum clinical datasets.

Piper A Svensson-Ranallo, Terrence J Adam, François Sainfort
Author Information
  1. Piper A Svensson-Ranallo: Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN;

Abstract

The concept of the minimum dataset (MDS) is taking on an increasingly important role in healthcare. In the current environment of health information exchange and universal implementation of electronic health records, work related to the development of one specific type of MDS, the minimum clinical dataset (MCDS), is beginning to permeate the literature. While there is currently no unified definition of either an MDS or an MCDS, an MDS is generally agreed to be a coherent set of explicitly defined data elements. Despite the growing body of literature on MCDSs, very little empirical evidence exists in the literature related to best methods for developing them. The primary objective of the current study is to fill this gap. By presenting a streamlined approach to the development of MCDSs the current study attempts to provide individuals and organizations with a coherent methodology and framework for developing a high quality MCDS.

References

  1. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007 Dec;14 Suppl 3:S3-22 [PMID: 18091134]
  2. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;44(8):759-64 [PMID: 20636198]
  3. Blood. 2007 Apr 15;109(8):3588-94 [PMID: 17158231]
  4. N Z Med J. 2002 Oct 11;115(1163):U200 [PMID: 12552306]
  5. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2000 Nov;35(11):518-22 [PMID: 11197928]
  6. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2005 Jan-Feb;28(1):56-8 [PMID: 15738736]
  7. Br Dent J. 2001 Jun 23;190(12):663-7 [PMID: 11453156]
  8. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Feb;18(1):37-43 [PMID: 19940769]
  9. Gerontologist. 1990 Jun;30(3):293-307 [PMID: 2354790]
  10. Heart Lung Circ. 2011 Jan;20(1):10-8 [PMID: 21051283]
  11. J Cyst Fibros. 2005 May;4(2):115-22 [PMID: 15978536]
  12. J Laryngol Otol. 2010 Sep;124(9):980-5 [PMID: 20529388]
  13. Am J Nurs. 1988 Dec;88(12):1651-3 [PMID: 3195634]
  14. Healthc Q. 2010;13 Spec No:102-9 [PMID: 20959738]
  15. Med Care. 1976 Jan;14(1):68-76 [PMID: 950812]
  16. N Z Med J. 1994 Jun 8;107(979):222-3 [PMID: 8208483]
  17. Int J Med Inform. 2002 Jun;65(2):121-33 [PMID: 12052425]
  18. Comp Funct Genomics. 2004;5(6-7):521-7 [PMID: 18629134]
  19. Br J Anaesth. 1994 Aug;73(2):256-60 [PMID: 7917749]
  20. Int Wound J. 2010 Jun;7(3):147-52 [PMID: 20602646]
  21. Health Policy. 1997 Jun;40(3):217-29 [PMID: 10168753]
  22. BJU Int. 2000 Nov;86(7):765-72 [PMID: 11069398]
  23. Int J Nurs Pract. 2010 Oct;16(5):517-24 [PMID: 20854350]
  24. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):e57 [PMID: 20702445]
  25. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 May-Jun;21(3):80-90 [PMID: 12026006]
  26. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006 Sep;20(5):416-24 [PMID: 16911021]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MDSminimumcurrentMCDSliteraturedevelopingdatasethealthrelateddevelopmentclinicalcoherentMCDSsstudymethodologyframeworkconcepttakingincreasinglyimportantrolehealthcareenvironmentinformationexchangeuniversalimplementationelectronicrecordsworkonespecifictypebeginningpermeatecurrentlyunifieddefinitioneithergenerallyagreedsetexplicitlydefineddataelementsDespitegrowingbodylittleempiricalevidenceexistsbestmethodsprimaryobjectivefillgappresentingstreamlinedapproachattemptsprovideindividualsorganizationshighqualitystandardizeddatasets

Similar Articles

Cited By