Great apes' risk-taking strategies in a decision making task.

Daniel B M Haun, Christian Nawroth, Josep Call
Author Information
  1. Daniel B M Haun: Max Planck Research Group for Comparative Cognitive Anthropology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany. haun@eva.mpg.de

Abstract

We investigate decision-making behaviour in all four non-human great ape species. Apes chose between a safe and a risky option across trials of varying expected values. All species chose the safe option more often with decreasing probability of success. While all species were risk-seeking, orangutans and chimpanzees chose the risky option more often than gorillas and bonobos. Hence all four species' preferences were ordered in a manner consistent with normative dictates of expected value, but varied predictably in their willingness to take risks.

References

  1. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Jan;32(1):60-70 [PMID: 16435965]
  2. Anim Cogn. 2012 Mar;15(2):223-38 [PMID: 21927850]
  3. Anim Cogn. 2004 Oct;7(4):239-46 [PMID: 15105996]
  4. Biol Lett. 2008 Jun 23;4(3):246-9 [PMID: 18364305]
  5. Anim Cogn. 2008 Jan;11(1):21-42 [PMID: 17437141]
  6. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2004 Oct;125(2):162-74 [PMID: 15365982]
  7. J Comp Psychol. 1997 Jun;111(2):159-73 [PMID: 9170281]
  8. Primates. 2003 Apr;44(2):199-201 [PMID: 12687486]
  9. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Dec;14(12):552-60 [PMID: 20971031]
  10. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1995 Jan;21(1):82-6 [PMID: 7844508]
  11. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Sep;13(9):389-96 [PMID: 19726218]
  12. J Comp Psychol. 2008 May;122(2):204-12 [PMID: 18489236]
  13. Curr Biol. 2008 Sep 23;18(18):1415-9 [PMID: 18804375]
  14. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2001 Apr;114(4):331-42 [PMID: 11275962]
  15. Anim Cogn. 2010 Sep;13(5):689-700 [PMID: 20306102]
  16. Curr Biol. 2007 Jan 9;17(1):49-53 [PMID: 17208186]
  17. Biol Lett. 2005 Jun 22;1(2):223-6 [PMID: 17148172]

MeSH Term

Animals
Decision Making
Hominidae
Risk-Taking
Species Specificity