Larvicidal efficacy of the Citrus limetta peel extracts against Indian strains of Anopheles stephensi Liston and Aedes aegypti L.

Sarita Kumar, Radhika Warikoo, Monika Mishra, Anubha Seth, Naim Wahab
Author Information
  1. Sarita Kumar: Department of Zoology, Acharya Narendra Dev College (University of Delhi), Govindpuri, New Delhi, 110019, India. sarita.sanjay90@gmail.com

Abstract

The extracts from the peels of Citrus limetta were prepared using hexane and petroleum ether as the solvents. The larvicidal potential of each extract was assessed against dengue fever vector, Aedes aegypti, and malarial vector, Anopheles stephensi, by evaluating the toxicity effects on early fourth instars. Both the extracts were found effective against both the species. The bioassay with hexane extracts resulted in LC(50) values of 132.45 and 96.15 ppm against A. stephensi and A. aegypti, respectively; while the petroleum ether extracts from the C. limetta peels showed LC(50) values of 244.59 and 145.50 ppm, respectively. It revealed that the hexane extracts possessed 1.9-fold more larvicidal potential against A. stephensi and 1.5-fold more efficacy against A. aegypti as compared to the extracts obtained using petroleum ether as solvent. The data further revealed that the extracts were 1.4-1.7 times more effective against A. aegypti as compared to A. stephensi. The qualitative phytochemical study of the extracts showed the presence of terpenoids and flavonoids as the common phytochemical constituents in the extracts suggesting their possible role in the toxicity. Other constituents tested were not detected except alkaloids which were found to be present only in the petroleum ether extract. Further studies are needed to isolate and identify the active principles involved, their mode of action, formulated preparations for enhancing potency and stability, toxicity, and effects on non-target organisms and the environment. This could help in formulating efficient strategies for mosquito control.

References

  1. J Agric Food Chem. 2001 Jul;49(7):3268-73 [PMID: 11453761]
  2. Parasitol Res. 2010 Sep;107(4):901-7 [PMID: 20549234]
  3. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2004 Aug;98(8):451-5 [PMID: 15186932]
  4. Parasitol Res. 2011 Dec;109(6):1671-6 [PMID: 21559763]
  5. Parasitol Res. 2009 Jun;104(6):1365-72 [PMID: 19198882]
  6. Parasitol Res. 2006 Sep;99(4):478-90 [PMID: 16642384]
  7. Parasitol Res. 2008 Jul;103(2):271-7 [PMID: 18409075]
  8. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Apr;78(4):536-7 [PMID: 18385342]
  9. East Afr Med J. 1994 Dec;71(12):797-9 [PMID: 7705251]
  10. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1991 Jun;7(2):210-37 [PMID: 1680152]
  11. Parasitol Res. 2005 Mar;95(5):363-5 [PMID: 15682335]
  12. J Ethnopharmacol. 1996 Nov;54(2-3):125-30 [PMID: 8953426]
  13. East Afr Med J. 1992 Apr;69(4):223-6 [PMID: 1644035]
  14. Trop Biomed. 2007 Dec;24(2):71-5 [PMID: 18209711]
  15. Parasitol Res. 2006 Sep;99(4):466-72 [PMID: 16642386]
  16. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2008 Mar;24(1):161-8 [PMID: 18437833]
  17. Parasitol Res. 2009 Sep;105(3):769-73 [PMID: 19424721]
  18. Bioresour Technol. 2001 Feb;76(3):273-4 [PMID: 11198181]
  19. Nat Med. 2004 Dec;10(12 Suppl):S98-109 [PMID: 15577938]
  20. Parasitol Res. 2009 Feb;104(3):637-43 [PMID: 18975001]
  21. Parasitol Res. 2009 Apr;104(5):1109-17 [PMID: 19050919]
  22. Parasitol Res. 2009 Oct;105(5):1411-7 [PMID: 19644705]
  23. J Ethnopharmacol. 1993 Mar;38(2-3):215-23 [PMID: 8510471]
  24. Parasitol Res. 2009 Jun;104(6):1289-93 [PMID: 19148681]
  25. J Vector Ecol. 2009 Jun;34(1):148-54 [PMID: 20836815]
  26. J Med Entomol. 2004 Jul;41(4):712-7 [PMID: 15311465]
  27. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 1998 Aug;28(2):595-606 [PMID: 9707687]
  28. Tanzan Health Res Bull. 2005 Sep;7(3):174-8 [PMID: 16941944]

MeSH Term

Aedes
Alkaloids
Animals
Anopheles
Citrus
Female
Flavonoids
Fruit
India
Insecticides
Larva
Plant Extracts
Survival Analysis
Terpenes

Chemicals

Alkaloids
Flavonoids
Insecticides
Plant Extracts
Terpenes

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0extractsaegyptistephensipetroleumetherlimettahexanetoxicity501peelsCitrususinglarvicidalpotentialextractvectorAedesAnopheleseffectsfoundeffectiveLCvaluesppmrespectivelyshowedrevealedefficacycomparedphytochemicalconstituentspreparedsolventsassesseddenguefevermalarialevaluatingearlyfourthinstarsspeciesbioassayresulted132459615C24459145possessed9-fold5-foldobtainedsolventdata4-17timesqualitativestudypresenceterpenoidsflavonoidscommonsuggestingpossibleroletesteddetectedexceptalkaloidspresentstudiesneededisolateidentifyactiveprinciplesinvolvedmodeactionformulatedpreparationsenhancingpotencystabilitynon-targetorganismsenvironmenthelpformulatingefficientstrategiesmosquitocontrolLarvicidalpeelIndianstrainsListonL

Similar Articles

Cited By