Geographic variations in availability and use of chiropractic under medicare.

James M Whedon, Yunjie Song
Author Information
  1. James M Whedon: The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA. James.m.whedon@dartmouth.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to measure geographic variations in the availability and use of chiropractic under Medicare.
METHODS: A cross-sectional design was used to analyze a large nationally representative sample of Medicare data. Data from a 20% representative sample of all paid Medicare Part B fee-for-service claims for 2007 were merged with files containing beneficiary and provider data. The sample was restricted to adults aged 65 to 99 years. Measures of chiropractic availability and use were described and selectively mapped by state. Geographic variations were quantified. Spearman test was used to evaluate for correlation between chiropractic availability and use.
RESULTS: The average number of doctors of chiropractic (DC) by state was 1135; average DC per 1000 beneficiaries was 2.5 (SD, 1.1). The average number of chiropractic users by state was 34,502 (SD, 30,844); average chiropractic users per 1000 beneficiaries was 76 (SD, 41). Chiropractic availability by state varied 6-fold, and chiropractic use varied nearly 30-fold. Availability was strongly correlated with use (Spearman ρ, 0.86; P < .001). Expenditures per DC were highest in the upper Midwest and lowest in the far West; expenditures per user were highest in New England and New York, and lowest in the West.
CONCLUSION: Chiropractic availability and use by older adults under Medicare predominated in rural states in the North Central United States. Expenditures were higher in the East and Midwest and lower in the far West. Chiropractic availability and use by state were highly correlated. Future analyses should use small-area analysis and statistical modeling to identify factors predictive of chiropractic use.

References

  1. J Chiropr Humanit. 2010 Dec;17(1):40-6 [PMID: 22693475]
  2. Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun;45(3):748-61 [PMID: 20002763]
  3. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 18;138(4):288-98 [PMID: 12585826]
  4. N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 24;361(13):1227-30 [PMID: 19741220]
  5. Chiropr Osteopat. 2010 Dec 21;18:34 [PMID: 21176137]
  6. Science. 1973 Dec 14;182(4117):1102-8 [PMID: 4750608]
  7. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 18;138(4):273-87 [PMID: 12585825]
  8. Health Serv Res. 1993 Jun;28(2):183-200 [PMID: 8514499]
  9. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995 Sep;18(7):464-70 [PMID: 8568429]
  10. Altern Ther Health Med. 2009 May-Jun;15(3):36-40 [PMID: 19472863]
  11. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Dec;48(12):1560-5 [PMID: 11129743]
  12. Chiropr Osteopat. 2007 Sep 06;15:12 [PMID: 17822549]
  13. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010 Oct;33(8):558-61 [PMID: 21036277]
  14. Inquiry. 2002 Spring;39(1):56-66 [PMID: 12067076]
  15. BMJ. 2004 Mar 13;328(7440):607 [PMID: 15016692]
  16. Health Serv Res. 2003 Feb;38(1 Pt 1):287-309 [PMID: 12650392]

Grants

  1. K01 AT005092/NCCIH NIH HHS
  2. K01 AT005092-03/NCCIH NIH HHS
  3. 5K01AT005092-03/NCCIH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Geography
Health Care Costs
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Male
Manipulation, Chiropractic
Medicare Part B
Quality of Health Care
Risk Assessment
Small-Area Analysis
United States

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0usechiropracticavailabilitystateMedicareaveragepervariationssampleDCSDChiropracticWestusedrepresentativedataadultsGeographicSpearmannumber1000beneficiaries1usersvariedcorrelatedExpenditureshighestMidwestlowestfarNewOBJECTIVE:purposestudymeasuregeographicMETHODS:cross-sectionaldesignanalyzelargenationallyData20%paidPartBfee-for-serviceclaims2007mergedfilescontainingbeneficiaryproviderrestrictedaged6599yearsMeasuresdescribedselectivelymappedquantifiedtestevaluatecorrelationRESULTS:doctors113525345023084476416-foldnearly30-foldAvailabilitystronglyρ086P<001upperexpendituresuserEnglandYorkCONCLUSION:olderpredominatedruralstatesNorthCentralUnitedStateshigherEastlowerhighlyFutureanalysessmall-areaanalysisstatisticalmodelingidentifyfactorspredictivemedicare

Similar Articles

Cited By