A conflict between nutritionally adequate diets and meeting the 2010 dietary guidelines for sodium.

Matthieu Maillot, Adam Drewnowski
Author Information
  1. Matthieu Maillot: Nutritional Sciences Program, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Compliance with dietary guidelines means incorporating multiple foods and nutrients into everyday diets, to be consumed in smaller or larger amounts. Feasibility studies can help determine whether one nutrient guideline comes into conflict with another. For one half of the U.S. population, the 2010 dietary guidelines for sodium were set at 1500 mg/d.
PURPOSE: To test the compatibility of the 1500 mg/day sodium goal with nutrient-adequate diets.
METHODS: Analyses, conducted in 2010, used U.S. federal nutrient composition and dietary intake databases to create modeled food patterns for six gender-age groups using linear programming techniques. The food patterns were designed to meet nutritional standards for 27 nutrients as the mean sodium content was progressively reduced from levels observed in the 2001-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) down to 1500 mg/day.
RESULTS: For adults aged <50 years, the 2300 mg/day sodium goal was consistent with nutrient-adequate diets but required large deviations from current eating patterns. The 1500 mg/day goal was not feasible and no mathematical solution was obtained. The lowest-sodium food patterns that were nutrient-adequate and theoretically achievable were very high in fruit juices, nuts, and seeds but were low in grains and meats.
CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with the 2010 sodium guidelines will require large deviations from current eating behaviors and/or a profound modification of the U.S. food supply.

References

  1. J Nutr. 2006 Apr;136(4):1021-6 [PMID: 16549468]
  2. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Feb;91(2):421-30 [PMID: 19939986]
  3. Public Health Nutr. 2008 Apr;11(4):395-404 [PMID: 17666136]
  4. Int J Public Health. 2008;53(2):68-77 [PMID: 18681335]
  5. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Nov;102(11):1621-30 [PMID: 12449285]
  6. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2006 Nov-Dec;38(6 Suppl):S78-92 [PMID: 17116598]
  7. J Nutr. 2002 Dec;132(12):3764-71 [PMID: 12468621]
  8. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2006 Mar-Apr;38(2):82-90 [PMID: 16595286]
  9. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Nov;106(11):1759-65 [PMID: 17081826]
  10. J Nutr. 2009 Sep;139(9):1721-7 [PMID: 19625703]
  11. J Am Diet Assoc. 1997 Mar;97(3):266-71 [PMID: 9060943]
  12. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Apr;89(4):1227-36 [PMID: 19211815]
  13. J Nutr. 2009 Aug;139(8):1541-8 [PMID: 19535422]
  14. Public Health Nutr. 2010 Aug;13(8):1178-85 [PMID: 20105388]
  15. J Nutr. 2011 Feb;141(2):333-40 [PMID: 21178090]
  16. J Nutr. 2006 Sep;136(9):2399-404 [PMID: 16920861]

Grants

  1. R01 DK076608/NIDDK NIH HHS
  2. R01 DK076608-03/NIDDK NIH HHS
  3. R01 DK 077068/NIDDK NIH HHS
  4. R21 DK085406-01/NIDDK NIH HHS
  5. R21 DK085406/NIDDK NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Age Factors
Algorithms
Female
Guidelines as Topic
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Nutrition Surveys
Nutritional Requirements
Sex Factors
Sodium, Dietary
Young Adult

Chemicals

Sodium, Dietary

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0sodiumdietaryguidelinesdiets20101500mg/dayfoodpatternsUSgoalnutrient-adequateCompliancenutrientsonenutrientconflictlargedeviationscurrenteatingBACKGROUND:meansincorporatingmultiplefoodseverydayconsumedsmallerlargeramountsFeasibilitystudiescanhelpdeterminewhetherguidelinecomesanotherhalfpopulationsetmg/dPURPOSE:testcompatibilityMETHODS:Analysesconductedusedfederalcompositionintakedatabasescreatemodeledsixgender-agegroupsusinglinearprogrammingtechniquesdesignedmeetnutritionalstandards27meancontentprogressivelyreducedlevelsobserved2001-2002NationalHealthNutritionExaminationSurveyNHANESRESULTS:adultsaged<50years2300consistentrequiredfeasiblemathematicalsolutionobtainedlowest-sodiumtheoreticallyachievablehighfruitjuicesnutsseedslowgrainsmeatsCONCLUSIONS:willrequirebehaviorsand/orprofoundmodificationsupplynutritionallyadequatemeeting

Similar Articles

Cited By