Characterizing operant hyperactivity in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat.

Jade C Hill, Katrina Herbst, Federico Sanabria
Author Information
  1. Jade C Hill: Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-1104, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Operant hyperactivity, the emission of reinforced responses at an inordinately high rate, has been reported in children with ADHD and in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat (SHR), the most widely studied animal model of ADHD. The SHR emits behavior at hyperactive levels, relative to a normoactive strain, only when such behavior is seldom reinforced. Because of its dependence on rate of reinforcement, operant hyperactivity appears to be driven primarily by incentive motivation, not motoric capacity. This claim was evaluated in the present study using a novel strategy, based on the organization of behavior in bouts of reinforced responses separated by pauses.
METHOD: Male SHR, Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) and Wistar rats (WIS) were exposed each to a multiple variable-interval schedule of sucrose reinforcement (12, 24, 48, 96, and 192 s) between post-natal days (PND) 48 and 93. Responding in each schedule was examined in two epochs, PND 58-62 and 89-93. Parameters of response-reinforcement functions (Herrnstein's hyperbola) and bout-organized behavior were estimated in each epoch.
RESULTS: SHR emitted higher response rates than WKY and WIS, but only when rate of reinforcement was low (fewer than 2 reinforcers per minute), and particularly in the second epoch. Estimates of Herrnstein's hyperbola parameters suggested the primacy of motivational over motoric factors driving the response-rate differential. Across epochs and schedules, a more detailed analysis of response bouts by SHR revealed that these were shorter than those by WKY, but more frequent than those by WKY and WIS. Differences in bout length subsided between epochs, but differences in bout-initiation rate were exacerbated. These results were interpreted in light of robust evidence linking changes in bout-organization parameters and experimental manipulations of motivation and response-reinforcement contingency.
CONCLUSIONS: Operant hyperactivity in SHR was confirmed. Although incentive motivation appears to play an important role in operant hyperactivity and motoric capacity cannot be ruled out as a factor, response-bout patterns suggest that operant hyperactivity is primarily driven by steeper delay-of-reinforcement gradients. Convergence of this conclusion with theoretical accounts of ADHD and with free-operant performance in children with ADHD supports the use of SHR as an animal model of ADHD.

References

  1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Jul;36(1):29-39 [PMID: 7241036]
  2. J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Jul;84(1):99-110 [PMID: 16156139]
  3. J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Apr 15;161(2):185-98 [PMID: 17275916]
  4. Behav Neural Biol. 1979 Oct;27(2):187-200 [PMID: 508216]
  5. Neuropharmacology. 2009 Dec;57(7-8):619-26 [PMID: 19698722]
  6. Psychol Bull. 1997 Jan;121(1):65-94 [PMID: 9000892]
  7. Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Jun 1;57(11):1239-47 [PMID: 15949994]
  8. Ambul Pediatr. 2007 Jan-Feb;7(1 Suppl):82-90 [PMID: 17261487]
  9. Behav Processes. 2001 Nov 1;56(2):85-101 [PMID: 11672935]
  10. Physiol Behav. 1992 Jul;52(1):49-57 [PMID: 1529013]
  11. Behav Brain Res. 2009 Mar 17;198(2):273-82 [PMID: 18824036]
  12. Int J Neurosci. 2004 Sep;114(9):1063-84 [PMID: 15370174]
  13. J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 Nov;90(3):345-62 [PMID: 19070341]
  14. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:267-72 [PMID: 13713775]
  15. Behav Brain Res. 2009 Dec 28;205(2):372-6 [PMID: 19616039]
  16. Behav Neural Biol. 1982 Jan;34(1):42-54 [PMID: 7073635]
  17. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000 Jan;24(1):31-9 [PMID: 10654658]
  18. J Neurosci Methods. 2007 May 15;162(1-2):42-8 [PMID: 17241669]
  19. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Jan;53(1):189-200 [PMID: 2299288]
  20. Dev Psychobiol. 1983 Mar;16(2):83-109 [PMID: 6339302]
  21. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243-66 [PMID: 16811440]
  22. Behav Brain Funct. 2008 Feb 08;4:7 [PMID: 18261220]
  23. Behav Brain Res. 2005 Jul 1;162(1):47-61 [PMID: 15922066]
  24. Behav Processes. 2011 May;87(1):57-63 [PMID: 21215304]
  25. Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;164(6):942-8 [PMID: 17541055]
  26. Behav Neural Biol. 1993 May;59(3):225-9 [PMID: 8503827]
  27. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1983 Jun;11(2):313-26 [PMID: 6619440]
  28. Behav Processes. 2009 Jun;81(2):309-15 [PMID: 19429225]
  29. Behav Brain Res. 1998 Jul;94(1):61-71 [PMID: 9708840]
  30. Behav Brain Res. 2005 Jul 1;162(1):22-31 [PMID: 15922064]
  31. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6(2):237-46 [PMID: 16811278]
  32. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:529-30 [PMID: 13945507]
  33. World Psychiatry. 2003 Jun;2(2):104-13 [PMID: 16946911]
  34. Physiol Behav. 1993 Dec;54(6):1047-55 [PMID: 8295939]
  35. Health Psychol. 1988;7(2):125-35 [PMID: 3371305]
  36. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005 Jul;46(7):755-73 [PMID: 15972069]
  37. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jul;40(1):1-13 [PMID: 16812333]
  38. Behav Brain Res. 1987 Aug;25(2):101-7 [PMID: 3675823]
  39. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Sep;161(9):857-64 [PMID: 17768285]
  40. J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 May;85(3):329-47 [PMID: 16776055]
  41. Behav Brain Funct. 2007 Nov 20;3:60 [PMID: 18028539]
  42. Behav Brain Sci. 2005 Jun;28(3):397-419; discussion 419-68 [PMID: 16209748]
  43. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2011;7:149-85 [PMID: 21287324]
  44. Psychol Med. 2006 Feb;36(2):159-65 [PMID: 16420712]
  45. Behav Brain Res. 1993 Feb 26;53(1-2):11-20 [PMID: 8466655]
  46. J Atten Disord. 2005 Nov;9(2):384-91 [PMID: 16371661]
  47. Behav Brain Res. 1998 Jul;94(1):73-82 [PMID: 9708841]
  48. Physiol Behav. 2008 Mar 18;93(4-5):777-82 [PMID: 18155738]
  49. J Atten Disord. 2010 Jan;13(4):358-68 [PMID: 19520999]
  50. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Apr;34(5):744-54 [PMID: 19944715]
  51. Behav Brain Res. 2008 Feb 11;187(1):146-52 [PMID: 17950930]
  52. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1954 Apr;47(2):114-6 [PMID: 13152223]
  53. Behav Pharmacol. 2004 Nov;15(7):443-59 [PMID: 15472567]
  54. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 May;12(3):391-5 [PMID: 16811362]
  55. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):247-74 [PMID: 11453618]
  56. J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Jul;96(1):17-38 [PMID: 21765544]
  57. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1995 Dec;23(6):729-49 [PMID: 8609310]
  58. J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Jan;93(1):129-39 [PMID: 20676272]
  59. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Spring;25(1):143-51 [PMID: 1582963]
  60. J Exp Anal Behav. 2004 Jan;81(1):65-83 [PMID: 15113134]
  61. Behav Neural Biol. 1983 Sep;39(1):22-9 [PMID: 6686441]
  62. Behav Brain Res. 2006 Dec 15;175(2):337-42 [PMID: 17034874]
  63. J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 Sep;80(2):159-71 [PMID: 14674726]
  64. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1999 May;63(1):71-82 [PMID: 10340526]
  65. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011 Jan;37(1):1-9 [PMID: 20718555]
  66. Behav Brain Funct. 2009 Feb 18;5:7 [PMID: 19226460]
  67. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006 May;47(5):457-71 [PMID: 16671929]
  68. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2006 Mar;83(3):380-90 [PMID: 16580713]
  69. Behav Neurosci. 2003 Apr;117(2):271-82 [PMID: 12708524]
  70. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Apr;163(4):716-23 [PMID: 16585449]

MeSH Term

Aging
Algorithms
Animals
Conditioning, Operant
Hyperkinesis
Male
Psychomotor Performance
Rats
Rats, Inbred SHR
Rats, Inbred WKY
Reinforcement Schedule

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0SHRhyperactivityADHDratebehavioroperantWKYreinforcedreinforcementmotivationmotoricWISepochsOperantresponseschildrenSpontaneouslyHypertensiveRatanimalmodelappearsdrivenprimarilyincentivecapacityboutsschedule48PNDresponse-reinforcementHerrnstein'shyperbolaepochresponseparametersBACKGROUND:emissioninordinatelyhighreportedwidelystudiedemitshyperactivelevelsrelativenormoactivestrainseldomdependenceclaimevaluatedpresentstudyusingnovelstrategybasedorganizationseparatedpausesMETHOD:MaleWistar-KyotoWistarratsexposedmultiplevariable-intervalsucrose122496192spost-nataldays93Respondingexaminedtwo58-6289-93Parametersfunctionsbout-organizedestimatedRESULTS:emittedhigherrateslowfewer2reinforcersperminuteparticularlysecondEstimatessuggestedprimacymotivationalfactorsdrivingresponse-ratedifferentialAcrossschedulesdetailedanalysisrevealedshorterfrequentDifferencesboutlengthsubsideddifferencesbout-initiationexacerbatedresultsinterpretedlightrobustevidencelinkingchangesbout-organizationexperimentalmanipulationscontingencyCONCLUSIONS:confirmedAlthoughplayimportantroleruledfactorresponse-boutpatternssuggeststeeperdelay-of-reinforcementgradientsConvergenceconclusiontheoreticalaccountsfree-operantperformancesupportsuseCharacterizing

Similar Articles

Cited By