Allometric or lean body mass scaling of propofol pharmacokinetics: towards simplifying parameter sets for target-controlled infusions.

Johan Francois Coetzee
Author Information
  1. Johan Francois Coetzee: Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Stellenbosch University, South Africa. jfc@sun.ac.za

Abstract

Uncertainty exists as to the most suitable pharmacokinetic parameter sets for propofol target-controlled infusions (TCI). The pharmacokinetic parameter sets currently employed are clearly not universally applicable, particularly when patient attributes differ from those of the subjects who participated in the original research from which the models were derived. Increasing evidence indicates that the pharmacokinetic parameters of propofol can be scaled allometrically as well as in direct proportion to lean body mass (LBM). Appraisal of hitherto published studies suggests that an allometrically scaled pharmacokinetic parameter set may be applicable to a wide range of patients ranging from children to obese adults. On the other hand, there is evidence that propofol pharmacokinetic parameters, scaled linearly to LBM, provide improved dosing in normal and obese adults. The 'Schnider' pharmacokinetic parameter set that has been programmed into commercially available TCI pumps cannot be employed at present for morbidly obese patients (body mass index >40 kg/m2), because of anomalous behaviour of the equation used to calculate LBM, resulting in administration of excessive amounts of propofol. Simulations of TCI using improved equations to calculate LBM indicate that the Schnider model delivers similar amounts of propofol to morbidly obese patients as do the allometrically scaled pharmacokinetic parameter sets. These hypotheses deserve further investigation. To facilitate further investigation, researchers are encouraged to make their data freely available to the WorldSIVA Open TCI Initiative (http://opentci.org).

References

  1. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Jan;98(1):66-75 [PMID: 17132644]
  2. Anesth Analg. 2011 Jul;113(1):57-62 [PMID: 20861415]
  3. Anesthesiology. 2010 Aug;113(2):343-52 [PMID: 20613468]
  4. Anesthesiology. 1998 May;88(5):1170-82 [PMID: 9605675]
  5. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010 May;38(3):437-44 [PMID: 20514950]
  6. Br J Anaesth. 1969 Jun;41(6):516-21 [PMID: 5792884]
  7. Anesth Analg. 1999 Sep;89(3):545-52 [PMID: 10475279]
  8. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1991 Feb;19(1):57-60 [PMID: 2012296]
  9. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Feb;104(2):261-2; author reply 262-4 [PMID: 20086066]
  10. Science. 1999 Jun 4;284(5420):1677-9 [PMID: 10356399]
  11. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 May;26(5):362-9 [PMID: 19307972]
  12. Br J Anaesth. 2003 Oct;91(4):507-13 [PMID: 14504151]
  13. Anesthesiology. 1994 Jan;80(1):104-22 [PMID: 8291699]
  14. Anesthesiology. 1995 Jun;82(6):1328-45 [PMID: 7793646]
  15. Science. 1997 Apr 4;276(5309):122-6 [PMID: 9082983]
  16. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Jul;84(1):27-38 [PMID: 18463625]
  17. J Exp Biol. 2005 May;208(Pt 9):1611-9 [PMID: 15855392]
  18. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Aug;58(2):119-33 [PMID: 15255794]
  19. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;48:303-32 [PMID: 17914927]
  20. Nature. 1999 May 13;399(6732):130-2 [PMID: 10335841]
  21. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Jun;59(6):705-11 [PMID: 15948935]
  22. Anesthesiology. 2000 Mar;92(3):727-38 [PMID: 10719952]
  23. Anesthesiology. 2006 Mar;104(3):466-74 [PMID: 16508393]
  24. Br J Anaesth. 1997 Oct;79(4):505-13 [PMID: 9389271]
  25. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 May;26(5):359-61 [PMID: 19359991]
  26. Anesthesiology. 1993 Apr;78(4):657-65 [PMID: 8466066]
  27. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Mar;18(3):235-9 [PMID: 18179618]
  28. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1998 May;50(5):493-9 [PMID: 9643442]
  29. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2011 Nov 1;50(11):739-50 [PMID: 21973271]
  30. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2010 Apr;49(4):269-75 [PMID: 20214410]
  31. Pharm Res. 2009 Jul;26(7):1626-34 [PMID: 19337821]
  32. Anesth Analg. 1987 Dec;66(12):1256-63 [PMID: 3500657]
  33. Br J Anaesth. 1991 Jul;67(1):41-8 [PMID: 1859758]
  34. Br J Anaesth. 2009 May;102(5):626-32 [PMID: 19297371]
  35. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Jul;103(1):26-37 [PMID: 19520702]
  36. Ups J Med Sci. 2008;113(2):161-70 [PMID: 18509810]
  37. Anesth Analg. 2010 Aug;111(2):368-79 [PMID: 19861357]
  38. Paediatr Anaesth. 2007 Nov;17(11):1028-34 [PMID: 17897267]
  39. Anesthesiology. 1987 Jul;67(1):32-41 [PMID: 3605733]
  40. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Oct;105(4):448-56 [PMID: 20710020]
  41. Physiol Rev. 1947 Oct;27(4):511-41 [PMID: 20267758]
  42. Anesthesiology. 2006 Jan;104(1):27-32 [PMID: 16394686]
  43. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005;44(10):1051-65 [PMID: 16176118]
  44. Circulation. 2001 Feb 13;103(6):820-5 [PMID: 11171789]
  45. Anaesthesia. 1983 Jul;38 Suppl:51-2 [PMID: 6869757]
  46. J Pharm Sci. 2010 Jul;99(7):2927-33 [PMID: 20127826]
  47. Science. 1973 Mar 23;179(4079):1201-4 [PMID: 4689015]
  48. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Jul;95(1):110 [PMID: 15941735]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anesthetics, Intravenous
Body Size
Body Weight
Child
Child, Preschool
Computer Simulation
Drug Delivery Systems
Drug Dosage Calculations
Humans
Infusion Pumps
Infusions, Intravenous
Linear Models
Middle Aged
Models, Biological
Obesity, Morbid
Propofol
Young Adult

Chemicals

Anesthetics, Intravenous
Propofol

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pharmacokineticparameterpropofolsetsTCIscaledLBMobeseallometricallybodymasspatientstarget-controlledinfusionsemployedapplicableevidenceparametersleansetadultsimprovedavailablemorbidlycalculateamountsinvestigationUncertaintyexistssuitablecurrentlyclearlyuniversallyparticularlypatientattributesdiffersubjectsparticipatedoriginalresearchmodelsderivedIncreasingindicatescanwelldirectproportionAppraisalhithertopublishedstudiessuggestsmaywiderangerangingchildrenhandlinearlyprovidedosingnormal'Schnider'programmedcommerciallypumpspresentindex>40 kg/m2anomalousbehaviourequationusedresultingadministrationexcessiveSimulationsusingequationsindicateSchnidermodeldeliverssimilarhypothesesdeservefacilitateresearchersencouragedmakedatafreelyWorldSIVAOpenInitiativehttp://opentciorgAllometricscalingpharmacokinetics:towardssimplifying

Similar Articles

Cited By