Luminescence based enzyme-labeled phage (Phazyme) assays for rapid detection of Shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli serogroups.

John D Willford, Bledar Bisha, Kyle E Bolenbaugh, Lawrence D Goodridge
Author Information
  1. John D Willford: Department of Animal Science; University of Wyoming; Laramie, WY USA.

Abstract

Most diagnostic approaches for Shiga toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC) have been designed to detect only serogroup O157 that causes a majority, but not all STEC related outbreaks in the United States. Therefore, there is a need to develop methodology that would enable the detection of other STEC serogroups that cause disease. Three bacteriophages (phages) that infect STEC serogroups O26, O103, O111, O145 and O157 were chemically labeled with horseradish peroxidase (HRP). The enzyme-labeled phages (Phazymes) were individually combined with a sampling device (a swab), STEC serogroup-specific immunomagnetic separation (IMS) beads, bacterial enrichment broth and luminescent HRP substrate, in a self-contained test device, while luminescence was measured in a hand-held luminometer.The O26 and O157 Phazyme assays correctly identified more than 93% of the bacteria tested during this study, the O123 Phazyme assay identified 89.6%, while the O111 and O145 Phazyme assays correctly detected 82.4% and 75.9%, respectively. The decreased specificity of the O111 and O145 assays was related to the broad host ranges of the phages used in both assays. The Phazyme assays were capable of directly detecting between 10(5) and 10(6) CFU/ml in pure culture, depending on the serogroup. In food trials, the O157 Phazyme assay was able to detect E. coli O157:H7 in spinach consistently at levels of 1 CFU/g and occasionally at levels of 0.1 CFU/g. The assay detected 10(0) CFU/100 cm(2) on swabbed meat samples and 10(2) CFU/100 ml in water samples. The Phazyme assay effectively detects most STEC in a simple and rapid manner, with minimal need for instrumentation to interpret the test result.

References

  1. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2011 May;8(5):601-7 [PMID: 21214490]
  2. J Food Prot. 2007 Jun;70(6):1366-72 [PMID: 17612065]
  3. Appl Spectrosc. 2003 Sep;57(9):1138-44 [PMID: 14611044]
  4. J Biotechnol. 2004 Oct 19;114(1-2):11-20 [PMID: 15464594]
  5. Arch Dis Child. 1990 Jul;65(7):722-7 [PMID: 2201262]
  6. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Jan;17(1):7-15 [PMID: 21192848]
  7. Euro Surveill. 2007 May 31;12(5):E070531.4 [PMID: 17868586]
  8. J Biotechnol. 2005 Jan 12;115(1):101-7 [PMID: 15607229]
  9. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Oct;61(10):3623-7 [PMID: 16535146]
  10. J Clin Microbiol. 1986 May;23(5):869-72 [PMID: 3519658]
  11. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Jul;34(7):1622-7 [PMID: 8784557]
  12. J Infect Dis. 1985 May;151(5):775-82 [PMID: 3886804]
  13. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Mar;70(3):1708-16 [PMID: 15006796]
  14. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Aug;30(8):2153-7 [PMID: 1500525]
  15. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Jan;70(1):527-34 [PMID: 14711684]
  16. J Med Microbiol. 2001 Feb;50(2):135-142 [PMID: 11211220]
  17. Mol Biotechnol. 1999 Nov;13(1):29-44 [PMID: 10934520]
  18. Clin Infect Dis. 1997 Jun;24(6):1278-9; discussion 1280-2 [PMID: 9195109]
  19. J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Jun;41(6):2650-3 [PMID: 12791895]
  20. J Anim Sci. 2007 Mar;85(13 Suppl):E45-62 [PMID: 17085726]
  21. J Clin Lab Anal. 1991;5(3):228-32 [PMID: 2061748]
  22. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Sep;66(9):4149-51 [PMID: 10966446]
  23. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998 Jan;11(1):142-201 [PMID: 9457432]
  24. J Med Microbiol. 2005 Dec;54(Pt 12):1163-1169 [PMID: 16278430]
  25. J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Mar;42(3):1099-108 [PMID: 15004060]
  26. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 28;103(13):4841-5 [PMID: 16549760]
  27. Epidemiol Infect. 2001 Oct;127(2):221-7 [PMID: 11693499]
  28. Int J Food Microbiol. 1999 Mar 1;47(1-2):43-50 [PMID: 10357272]
  29. J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Nov;36(11):3375-7 [PMID: 9774599]
  30. Clin Lab Sci. 1998 Sep-Oct;11(5):266-8 [PMID: 10186949]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PhazymeSTECassaysO157assay10coliserogroupsphagesO111O145ShigatoxinproducingEscherichiadetectserogrouprelatedneeddetectionO26HRPenzyme-labeleddevicetestcorrectlyidentifieddetectedlevels1CFU/g0CFU/1002samplesrapiddiagnosticapproachesdesignedcausesmajorityoutbreaksUnitedStatesThereforedevelopmethodologyenablecausediseaseThreebacteriophagesinfectO103chemicallylabeledhorseradishperoxidasePhazymesindividuallycombinedsamplingswabserogroup-specificimmunomagneticseparationIMSbeadsbacterialenrichmentbrothluminescentsubstrateself-containedluminescencemeasuredhand-heldluminometerThe93%bacteriatestedstudyO123896%824%759%respectivelydecreasedspecificitybroadhostrangesusedcapabledirectlydetecting56CFU/mlpureculturedependingfoodtrialsableEO157:H7spinachconsistentlyoccasionallycmswabbedmeatmlwatereffectivelydetectssimplemannerminimalinstrumentationinterpretresultLuminescencebasedphage

Similar Articles

Cited By