The identification of a sensitizing component used in the manufacturing of an ink ribbon.

Stacey E Anderson, Loren Tapp, Srinivas Durgam, B Jean Meade, Laurel G Jackson, David E Cohen
Author Information
  1. Stacey E Anderson: Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA. sanderson4@cdc.gov

Abstract

Skin diseases including dermatitis constitute ≈ 30% of all occupational illnesses, with a high incidence in the printing industry. An outbreak of contact dermatitis among employees at an ink ribbon manufacturing plant was investigated by scientists from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Employees in the process areas of the plant were exposed to numerous chemicals and many had experienced skin rashes, especially after the introduction of a new ink ribbon product. To identify the causative agent(s) of the occupational dermatitis, the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) was used to identify the potential of the chemicals used in the manufacture of the ink ribbon to induce allergic contact dermatitis. Follow-up patch testing with the suspected allergens was conducted on exposed employees. polyvinyl butyral, a chemical component used in the manufacture of the ink ribbon in question and other products, tested positive in the LLNA, with an EC3 of 3.6%, which identifies it as a potential sensitizer; however, no employees tested positive to this chemical during skin patch testing. This finding has implications beyond those described in this report because of occupational exposure to polyvinyl butyral outside of the printing industry.

References

  1. Contact Dermatitis. 2003 Oct;49(4):189-93 [PMID: 14996066]
  2. Fed Regist. 1999 Mar 23;64(55):14006-7 [PMID: 10558409]
  3. Toxicol Sci. 1999 Apr;48(2):206-17 [PMID: 10353312]
  4. Dermatol Clin. 1988 Jan;6(1):61-6 [PMID: 2968215]
  5. Am J Ind Med. 1998 Dec;34(6):568-73 [PMID: 9816414]
  6. J Immunoassay. 2000 May-Aug;21(2-3):165-209 [PMID: 10929886]
  7. Contact Dermatitis. 1985 Apr;12(4):209-12 [PMID: 3160531]
  8. Toxicology. 2000 May 5;146(2-3):221-7 [PMID: 10814854]
  9. Am J Contact Dermat. 2001 Jun;12(2):109-12 [PMID: 11381347]
  10. J Immunotoxicol. 2007 Jul;4(3):239-46 [PMID: 18958734]
  11. Contact Dermatitis. 1994 Jan;30(1):12-5 [PMID: 8156756]
  12. Toxicol Sci. 2003 Sep;75(1):89-98 [PMID: 12832659]
  13. Contact Dermatitis. 2001 Mar;44(3):137-9 [PMID: 11217984]
  14. Occup Environ Med. 2002 Jul;59(7):487-92 [PMID: 12107299]
  15. J Appl Toxicol. 1999 Jul-Aug;19(4):261-6 [PMID: 10439340]
  16. Contact Dermatitis. 2001 Dec;45(6):350-3 [PMID: 11846751]
  17. Dermatol Clin. 2009 Jul;27(3):365-83, vii-viii [PMID: 19580930]
  18. Contact Dermatitis. 1986 May;14(5):280-7 [PMID: 2943556]
  19. Int J Dermatol. 1984 Mar;23(2):108-9 [PMID: 6230327]
  20. Am J Ind Med. 1999 Sep;Suppl 1:139-41 [PMID: 10519814]
  21. Br J Ind Med. 1983 Aug;40(3):241-50 [PMID: 6223656]

Grants

  1. CC999999/Intramural CDC HHS

MeSH Term

Allergens
Animals
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact
Environmental Monitoring
Female
Humans
Immunization
Industry
Ink
Local Lymph Node Assay
Mice
Mice, Inbred BALB C
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S.
Occupational Exposure
Patch Tests
United States

Chemicals

Allergens

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0inkribbondermatitisusedoccupationalemployeesprintingindustrycontactmanufacturingplantexposedchemicalsskinidentifyLLNApotentialmanufacturepatchtestingbutyralchemicalcomponenttestedpositiveSkindiseasesincludingconstitute30%illnesseshighincidenceoutbreakamonginvestigatedscientistsNationalInstituteOccupationalSafetyHealthNIOSHEmployeesprocessareasnumerousmanyexperiencedrashesespeciallyintroductionnewproductcausativeagentsmurinelocallymphnodeassayinduceallergicFollow-upsuspectedallergensconductedPolyvinylquestionproductsEC336%identifiessensitizerhoweverfindingimplicationsbeyonddescribedreportexposurepolyvinyloutsideidentificationsensitizing

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)