Effects of lesions of the amygdala central nucleus on autoshaped lever pressing.

Stephen E Chang, Daniel S Wheeler, Peter C Holland
Author Information
  1. Stephen E Chang: Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA

Abstract

Neutral cues paired with rewards often appear to acquire motivational significance, as if the incentive motivational value of the reward is transferred to the cue. Such cues have been reported to modulate the performance of instrumental action (Pavlovian-instrumental transfer, PIT), serve as conditioned reinforcers in the establishment of new learning, and be the targets of approach and other cue-directed behaviors. Here we examined the effects of lesions of the amygdala central nucleus (CeA) on the acquisition of discriminative autoshaped lever-pressing. Insertion of one lever into the experimental chamber was reinforced by sucrose delivery, but insertion of another lever was not reinforced. Although sucrose delivery was not contingent on lever pressing, both CeA- and sham-lesioned rats rapidly came to press the reinforced but not the nonreinforced lever. Despite their showing little evidence of impairments in autoshaped lever pressing, these same CeA-lesioned rats showed significant deficits in the expression of PIT in a subsequent phase of the experiment. The lack of impaired autoshaping in CeA-lesioned rats contrasts with effects previously reported for conditioned orienting responses (ORs) and for other putative measures of incentive learning including PIT and conditioned approach to visual cues.

References

  1. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56 Suppl 1:139-48 [PMID: 18619474]
  2. Behav Neurosci. 2005 Feb;119(1):202-12 [PMID: 15727525]
  3. J Neurosci. 1996 Aug 15;16(16):5256-65 [PMID: 8756453]
  4. Behav Brain Res. 2008 Jan 10;186(1):48-56 [PMID: 17719099]
  5. Eur J Neurosci. 2001 May;13(10):1984-92 [PMID: 11403692]
  6. Eur J Neurosci. 2007 Mar;25(5):1557-67 [PMID: 17425582]
  7. Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Jul;20(1):240-8 [PMID: 15245496]
  8. Physiol Behav. 2005 Dec 15;86(5):747-61 [PMID: 16256152]
  9. Eur J Neurosci. 2006 Jul;24(1):270-6 [PMID: 16882023]
  10. Eur J Neurosci. 2002 Jun;15(11):1841-53 [PMID: 12081664]
  11. Behav Neurosci. 1996 Oct;110(5):981-90 [PMID: 8919000]
  12. Behav Neurosci. 1997 Oct;111(5):908-19 [PMID: 9383513]
  13. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1983 Jul;9(3):225-47 [PMID: 6153052]
  14. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000 Mar;24(2):173-98 [PMID: 10714382]
  15. J Neurosci. 2009 May 20;29(20):6500-13 [PMID: 19458221]
  16. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1980 Jan;6(1):81-97 [PMID: 7373228]
  17. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2012 May;97(4):441-51 [PMID: 22469749]
  18. J Neurosci. 2005 Apr 13;25(15):3881-8 [PMID: 15829640]
  19. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002 May;26(3):321-52 [PMID: 12034134]
  20. J Neurosci. 1990 Jun;10(6):1906-11 [PMID: 2355257]
  21. Physiol Behav. 2004 Apr;81(2):179-209 [PMID: 15159167]
  22. Proc Biol Sci. 2011 May 22;278(1711):1450-6 [PMID: 21047860]
  23. Physiol Behav. 1984 Jan;32(1):11-5 [PMID: 6718520]
  24. Learn Behav. 2004 Nov;32(4):463-76 [PMID: 15825887]
  25. Eur J Neurosci. 2000 Jan;12(1):405-13 [PMID: 10651899]
  26. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1996 Autumn;20(3):505-35 [PMID: 8880737]
  27. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1977 Jan;3(1):77-104 [PMID: 845545]
  28. Eur J Neurosci. 2003 Apr;17(8):1680-94 [PMID: 12752386]
  29. Behav Brain Res. 1993 Jun 30;55(2):167-83 [PMID: 8357526]
  30. Brain Res Rev. 2008 Jun;58(1):121-35 [PMID: 18234349]
  31. J Neurosci. 1997 May 15;17(10):3913-9 [PMID: 9133409]
  32. J Neurosci. 2005 Jan 26;25(4):962-70 [PMID: 15673677]

Grants

  1. R01 MH053667/NIMH NIH HHS
  2. R37 MH053667/NIMH NIH HHS
  3. R37 MH053667-16/NIMH NIH HHS
  4. MH53667/NIMH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Amygdala
Animals
Conditioning, Operant
Cues
Discrimination Learning
Extinction, Psychological
Ibotenic Acid
Male
Rats
Rats, Long-Evans
Transfer, Psychology

Chemicals

Ibotenic Acid

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0levercuesPITconditionedautoshapedreinforcedpressingratsmotivationalincentivereportedlearningapproacheffectslesionsamygdalacentralnucleussucrosedeliveryCeA-lesionedNeutralpairedrewardsoftenappearacquiresignificancevaluerewardtransferredcuemodulateperformanceinstrumentalactionPavlovian-instrumentaltransferservereinforcersestablishmentnewtargetscue-directedbehaviorsexaminedCeAacquisitiondiscriminativelever-pressingInsertiononeexperimentalchamberinsertionanotherAlthoughcontingentCeA-sham-lesionedrapidlycamepressnonreinforcedDespiteshowinglittleevidenceimpairmentsshowedsignificantdeficitsexpressionsubsequentphaseexperimentlackimpairedautoshapingcontrastspreviouslyorientingresponsesORsputativemeasuresincludingvisualEffects

Similar Articles

Cited By