Factors in perioperative care that determine blood loss in liver surgery.

Stephen J McNally, Erica J Revie, Lisa J Massie, Dermot W McKeown, Rowan W Parks, O James Garden, Stephen J Wigmore
Author Information
  1. Stephen J McNally: Department of Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. stephen.mcnally@ed.ac.uk

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Excessive blood loss during liver surgery contributes to postoperative morbidity and mortality and the minimizing of blood loss improves outcomes. This study examines pre- and intraoperative factors contributing to blood loss and identifies areas for improvement.
METHODS: All patients who underwent elective hepatic resection between June 2007 and June 2009 were identified. Detailed information on the pre- and perioperative clinical course was analysed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with intraoperative blood loss.
RESULTS: A total of 175 patients were studied, of whom 95 (54%) underwent resection of three or more segments. Median blood loss was 782 ml. Greater blood loss occurred during major resections and prolonged surgery and was associated with an increase in postoperative complications (P= 0.026). Peak central venous pressure (CVP) of >10 cm H(2)O was associated with increased blood loss (P= 0.01). Although no differences in case mix were identified, blood loss varied significantly among anaesthetists, as did intraoperative volumes of i.v. fluids and transfusion practices.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms a relationship between CVP and blood loss in hepatic resection. Intraoperative CVP values were higher than those described in other studies. There was variation in the intraoperative management of patients. Collaboration between surgical and anaesthesia teams is required to minimize blood loss and the standardization of intraoperative anaesthesia practice may improve outcomes following liver surgery.

References

  1. Transfusion. 2007 Aug;47(2 Suppl):132S-136S; discussion 155S-156S [PMID: 17651336]
  2. Anesth Analg. 2004 May;98(5):1245-51, table of contents [PMID: 15105195]
  3. HPB (Oxford). 2010 Feb;12(1):50-5 [PMID: 20495645]
  4. World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb 14;12(6):935-9 [PMID: 16521223]
  5. Anesthesiology. 1985 Feb;62(2):107-14 [PMID: 3970360]
  6. Transfusion. 2007 Nov;47(11):2081-8 [PMID: 17958538]
  7. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000 Mar-Apr;4(2):162-7 [PMID: 10675239]
  8. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13 [PMID: 15273542]
  9. Anesth Analg. 2003 Sep;97(3):671-679 [PMID: 12933381]
  10. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 Feb 24;5:7 [PMID: 20181257]
  11. Transplant Proc. 2008 Jan-Feb;40(1):224-7 [PMID: 18261592]
  12. Br J Surg. 1998 Feb;85(2):188-90 [PMID: 9501812]
  13. HPB (Oxford). 2011 Aug;13(8):528-35 [PMID: 21762295]
  14. HPB (Oxford). 2010 Jun;12(5):302-10 [PMID: 20590903]
  15. Liver Transpl. 2007 Feb;13(2):266-71 [PMID: 17256757]
  16. World J Surg. 1999 Jul;23(7):676-80 [PMID: 10390585]
  17. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 May;53(5):601-6 [PMID: 19419353]
  18. Ann Surg. 1988 Dec;208(6):679-87 [PMID: 3196088]
  19. Br J Surg. 1998 Aug;85(8):1058-60 [PMID: 9717995]
  20. Liver Transpl. 2007 Apr;13(4):537-42 [PMID: 17394151]
  21. Gut. 2006 Aug;55 Suppl 3:iii1-8 [PMID: 16835351]
  22. Ann Surg. 2004 Oct;240(4):698-708; discussion 708-10 [PMID: 15383797]
  23. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2008 Dec-2009 Jan;42(6):531-6 [PMID: 18583299]
  24. Br J Anaesth. 1992 Jan;68(1):6-12 [PMID: 1739569]
  25. Anesth Analg. 2010 Sep;111(3):660-4 [PMID: 19955507]
  26. Ann Surg. 2002 Oct;236(4):397-406; discussion 406-7 [PMID: 12368667]
  27. J Am Coll Surg. 1998 Dec;187(6):620-5 [PMID: 9849736]

Grants

  1. CZB/4/442/Chief Scientist Office

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anesthesia, General
Blood Loss, Surgical
Central Venous Pressure
Chi-Square Distribution
Elective Surgical Procedures
Female
Hepatectomy
Humans
Liver Neoplasms
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Perioperative Care
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Scotland
Transfusion Reaction
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bloodlossintraoperativesurgeryliverpatientsresectionassociatedCVPpostoperativeoutcomesstudypre-factorsunderwenthepaticJuneidentifiedperioperativeP=0anaesthesiaOBJECTIVES:ExcessivecontributesmorbiditymortalityminimizingimprovesexaminescontributingidentifiesareasimprovementMETHODS:elective20072009DetailedinformationclinicalcourseanalysedUnivariatemultivariateanalysesusedidentifyRESULTS:total175studied9554%threesegmentsMedian782mlGreateroccurredmajorresectionsprolongedincreasecomplications026Peakcentralvenouspressure>10cmH2Oincreased01AlthoughdifferencescasemixvariedsignificantlyamonganaesthetistsvolumesivfluidstransfusionpracticesCONCLUSIONS:confirmsrelationshipIntraoperativevalueshigherdescribedstudiesvariationmanagementCollaborationsurgicalteamsrequiredminimizestandardizationpracticemayimprovefollowingFactorscaredetermine

Similar Articles

Cited By