Disrupted stimulus control but not reward sensitivity in individuals with autism spectrum disorders: a matching law analysis.

Phil Reed, Rose Hawthorn, Sam Bolger, Katie Meredith, Ruth Bishop
Author Information
  1. Phil Reed: Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, UK. p.reed@swansea.ac.uk

Abstract

The matching law suggests that behavior is emitted in proportion to the level of reinforcement available. The current study investigated this effect in individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), and focused on the effects of magnitude of reinforcement (Study 1), and rate of reinforcement (Studies 2 and 3), on matching performance. Studies 1 and 2 employed lower functioning children with ASD, and demonstrated matching in both groups, but that the group with ASD displayed greater levels of stimulus bias. Study 3 employed higher functioning children with ASD, and found little evidence of matching, but higher stimulus bias in the group with ASD. These effects suggest a disruption of stimulus control, but not reward sensitivity, in individuals with ASD.

References

  1. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1987 Feb;55(1):3-9 [PMID: 3571656]
  2. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):683-8 [PMID: 16811315]
  3. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Spring;26(1):37-52 [PMID: 8473257]
  4. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):387-410 [PMID: 9316255]
  5. J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Winter;34(4):491-5 [PMID: 11800188]
  6. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1980 Jul;21(3):221-9 [PMID: 7430288]
  7. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Mar;41(2):157-67 [PMID: 16812364]
  8. J Exp Child Psychol. 1985 Oct;40(2):350-74 [PMID: 4045384]
  9. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Mar;65(2):445-63 [PMID: 16812806]
  10. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Winter;29(4):519-32; quiz 532-3 [PMID: 8995834]
  11. J Autism Dev Disord. 2003 Feb;33(1):23-30 [PMID: 12708577]
  12. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jan;59(1):29-60 [PMID: 8433066]
  13. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231-42 [PMID: 16811782]
  14. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6:299-300 [PMID: 14019311]
  15. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:267-72 [PMID: 13713775]
  16. J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Spring;34(1):57-60 [PMID: 11317987]
  17. Behav Processes. 2008 Jul;78(3):421-8 [PMID: 18406078]
  18. Res Dev Disabil. 2008 May-Jun;29(3):217-34 [PMID: 17512167]
  19. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243-66 [PMID: 16811440]
  20. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):213-30 [PMID: 16795888]
  21. Am J Ment Retard. 2002 Mar;107(2):136-45 [PMID: 11853531]
  22. Behav Res Ther. 1971 Nov;9(4):305-10 [PMID: 5149581]
  23. Behav Anal. 1988 Fall;11(2):95-109 [PMID: 22478003]
  24. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Spring;29(1):11-24 [PMID: 8881341]
  25. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2002 Oct;163(3-4):319-26 [PMID: 12373433]
  26. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 May;61(3):505-16 [PMID: 16812733]
  27. J Autism Dev Disord. 1988 Mar;18(1):81-97 [PMID: 3372461]
  28. Behav Res Ther. 1971 Feb;9(1):39-49 [PMID: 5573167]
  29. J Autism Dev Disord. 2009 Feb;39(2):290-8 [PMID: 18787937]
  30. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Jan;49(1):21-36 [PMID: 16812530]
  31. J Autism Child Schizophr. 1976 Jun;6(2):147-56 [PMID: 989488]
  32. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Sep;32(2):269-81 [PMID: 501274]

MeSH Term

Child
Child Development Disorders, Pervasive
Humans
Language
Male
Neuropsychological Tests
Reinforcement Schedule
Reward

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ASDmatchingstimulusreinforcementindividualslawautismspectrumeffectsStudy1Studies23employedfunctioningchildrengroupbiashighercontrolrewardsensitivitysuggestsbehavioremittedproportionlevelavailablecurrentstudyinvestigatedeffectdisordersfocusedmagnituderateperformancelowerdemonstratedgroupsdisplayedgreaterlevelsfoundlittleevidencesuggestdisruptionDisrupteddisorders:analysis

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.