"What do they want me to say?" The hidden curriculum at work in the medical school selection process: a qualitative study.

Jonathan White, Keith Brownell, Jean-Francois Lemay, Jocelyn M Lockyer
Author Information
  1. Jonathan White: Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. jswhite1@ualberta.ca

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been little study of the role of the essay question in selection for medical school. The purpose of this study was to obtain a better understanding of how applicants approached the essay questions used in selection at our medical school in 2007.
METHODS: The authors conducted a qualitative analysis of 210 essays written as part of the medical school admissions process, and developed a conceptual framework to describe the relationships, ideas and concepts observed in the data.
RESULTS: Findings of this analysis were confirmed in interviews with applicants and assessors. Analysis revealed a tension between "genuine" and "expected" responses that we believe applicants experience when choosing how to answer questions in the admissions process. A theory named "What do they want me to say?" was developed to describe the ways in which applicants modulate their responses to conform to their expectations of the selection process; the elements of this theory were confirmed in interviews with applicants and assessors.
CONCLUSIONS: This work suggests the existence of a "hidden curriculum of admissions" and demonstrates that the process of selection has a strong influence on applicant response. This paper suggests ways that selection might be modified to address this effect. Studies such as this can help us to appreciate the unintended consequences of admissions processes and can identify ways to make the selection process more consistent, transparent and fair.

References

  1. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007 Nov;12(4):509-21 [PMID: 17703368]
  2. Acad Med. 2002 Jun;77(6):475-80 [PMID: 12063190]
  3. Med Educ. 2004 Mar;38(3):314-26 [PMID: 14996341]
  4. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2004;9(2):137-45 [PMID: 15141131]
  5. Nurse Educ Today. 2003 Nov;23(8):620-7 [PMID: 14554116]
  6. Acad Med. 1994 Nov;69(11):861-71 [PMID: 7945681]
  7. BMJ. 2004 Oct 2;329(7469):770-3 [PMID: 15459051]
  8. Acad Med. 2008 Jul;83(7):623-4 [PMID: 18580074]
  9. Med Educ. 2007 Jun;41(6):573-9 [PMID: 17518837]
  10. Med Educ. 2000 Aug;34(8):642-7 [PMID: 10964212]
  11. CMAJ. 1997 Jan 15;156(2):219-22 [PMID: 9012725]
  12. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2004;9(2):161-74 [PMID: 15141133]
  13. Med Teach. 2008;30(6):606-11 [PMID: 18608968]
  14. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009 Dec;14(5):759-75 [PMID: 19340597]
  15. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2001;6(2):159-75 [PMID: 11435766]
  16. Acad Med. 2008 May;83(5):516-20 [PMID: 18448911]
  17. Mt Sinai J Med. 2002 Nov;69(6):385-97 [PMID: 12429957]
  18. Med Teach. 2011;33(10):e541-8 [PMID: 21942490]
  19. Med Teach. 2007 May;29(4):394-6 [PMID: 17786758]
  20. Acad Med. 2003 Feb;78(2):189-201 [PMID: 12584098]
  21. Acad Med. 1998 Jan;73(1):55-7 [PMID: 9447202]
  22. Teach Learn Med. 2002 Winter;14(1):34-42 [PMID: 11865747]
  23. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jul;23(7):942-7 [PMID: 18612721]
  24. Med Educ. 2000 Mar;34(3):165 [PMID: 10733698]
  25. Acad Med. 1998 Apr;73(4):403-7 [PMID: 9580717]
  26. Am J Occup Ther. 1997 Oct;51(9):775-9 [PMID: 9311434]
  27. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 May;13(2):193-202 [PMID: 17043916]
  28. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2004;9(2):79-82 [PMID: 15222333]
  29. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2002;7(3):191-200 [PMID: 12510141]

MeSH Term

Alberta
Concept Formation
Curriculum
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Models, Theoretical
School Admission Criteria
Schools, Medical
Writing

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0selectionapplicantsprocessmedicalschoolstudyadmissionswaysessayquestionsqualitativeanalysisdevelopeddescribeconfirmedinterviewsassessorsresponsestheory"Whatwantsay?"worksuggestscurriculumcanBACKGROUND:littlerolequestionpurposeobtainbetterunderstandingapproachedused2007METHODS:authorsconducted210essayswrittenpartconceptualframeworkrelationshipsideasconceptsobserveddataRESULTS:FindingsAnalysisrevealedtension"genuine""expected"believeexperiencechoosinganswernamedmodulateconformexpectationselementsCONCLUSIONS:existence"hiddenadmissions"demonstratesstronginfluenceapplicantresponsepapermightmodifiedaddresseffectStudieshelpusappreciateunintendedconsequencesprocessesidentifymakeconsistenttransparentfairhiddenprocess:

Similar Articles

Cited By