Efficacy of duloxetine on painful physical symptoms in major depressive disorder for patients with clinically significant painful physical symptoms at baseline: a meta-analysis of 11 double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials.

Susan G Ball, Durisala Desaiah, Melissa E Spann, Qi Zhang, James M Russell, Michael J Robinson, Koen Demyttenaere
Author Information
  1. Susan G Ball: Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana (Drs Ball, Desaiah, Spann, Russell, and Robinson and Ms Zhang); and University Psychiatric Center-Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium (Dr Demyttenaere). Dr Spann is currently employed by Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, Texas.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review efficacy of duloxetine for physical symptoms and depressive illness in patients with at least mild to moderate major depressive disorder (MDD; DSM-IV) and clinically significant painful physical symptoms at baseline.
DATA SOURCES: Global database of duloxetine clinical trials (Eli Lilly and Company).
STUDY SELECTION: All 11 acute, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of duloxetine (7 with duloxetine 60-mg doses and 4 with non-60-mg doses) in the database that used a scale to measure painful physical symptoms and were completed before March 17, 2011.
DATA EXTRACTION: For each study, patients with clinically significant pain levels at baseline (Visual Analog Scale overall pain rating ≥ 30, Numerical Rating Scale score ≥ 3, or Brief Pain Inventory 24-hour average pain rating ≥ 3) were selected in order to determine the effect sizes of duloxetine (compared with placebo for each trial) on the pain and depression measures. Overall effect sizes for both painful physical symptoms and MDD were obtained from the mean of individual-trial effect sizes, and each effect size was weighted relative to the number of patients within each study.
DATA SYNTHESIS: The overall mean effect sizes were as follows: painful physical symptoms-60-mg trials, 0.29 (95% CI, 0.06 to 0.52); non-60-mg trials, 0.13 (95% CI, -0.19 to 0.45); MDD-60-mg trials, 0.29 (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.40); non-60-mg trials, 0.16 (95% CI, 0.00 to 0.32). Across the 11 studies, the weighted effect size for painful physical symptoms was 0.26 (95% CI, 0.00 to 0.51) and for MDD, 0.25 (95% CI, 0.16 to 0.34).
CONCLUSIONS: According to this meta-analysis, duloxetine 60 mg once daily is as effective in improving painful physical symptoms as it is for depression in patients with MDD and clinically significant painful physical symptoms. The results of this meta-analysis indicate that duloxetine has small effect sizes in reducing painful physical symptoms and depressive symptoms in patients with MDD and clinically significant pain levels at baseline. Thus, the results of the study permit one to conclude that duloxetine has a clinically significant impact on painful physical symptoms and in reducing the severity of depressive symptoms. However, the results do not address its efficacy compared to other alternatives, as in all studies the comparator was placebo.

References

  1. J Biopharm Stat. 2001 Feb-May;11(1-2):9-21 [PMID: 11459446]
  2. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64 Suppl 7:5-11 [PMID: 12755646]
  3. Ann Behav Med. 2004 Apr;27(2):138-45 [PMID: 15026298]
  4. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2009 Jun 01;14:5031-51 [PMID: 19482603]
  5. Pharm Stat. 2008 Apr-Jun;7(2):93-106 [PMID: 17351897]
  6. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;71(3):270-9 [PMID: 20122371]
  7. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23:56-62 [PMID: 14399272]
  8. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;5(1):19-28 [PMID: 15156243]
  9. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002 Apr;63(4):308-15 [PMID: 12000204]
  10. Psychol Med. 2010 Feb;40(2):239-51 [PMID: 19493369]
  11. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Apr;65(4):521-30 [PMID: 15119915]
  12. Biometrics. 1997 Sep;53(3):983-97 [PMID: 9333350]
  13. Psychother Psychosom. 2008;77(1):12-6 [PMID: 18087203]
  14. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004 Dec;14(6):457-70 [PMID: 15589385]
  15. Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;164(6):900-9 [PMID: 17541049]
  16. Eur Psychiatry. 2006 Sep;21(6):367-78 [PMID: 16697153]
  17. JAMA. 2004 Apr 21;291(15):1887-96 [PMID: 15100209]
  18. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;67(8):1232-9 [PMID: 16965201]
  19. J Psychiatr Res. 2007 Apr-Jun;41(3-4):311-8 [PMID: 16934840]
  20. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2005 Dec 1;62(23):2481-90 [PMID: 16303903]
  21. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2003 Nov;35(4):504-11 [PMID: 14748494]
  22. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003 Mar;28(3):552-7 [PMID: 12629536]
  23. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004 Aug;24(4):389-99 [PMID: 15232330]
  24. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2002 Autumn;36(4):106-32 [PMID: 12858150]
  25. Psychosomatics. 2004 Jan-Feb;45(1):17-28 [PMID: 14709757]
  26. JAMA. 2009 May 27;301(20):2099-110 [PMID: 19470987]
  27. J Psychiatr Res. 2002 Nov-Dec;36(6):383-90 [PMID: 12393307]
  28. Psychosom Med. 2004 Jan-Feb;66(1):17-22 [PMID: 14747633]
  29. Pain. 2008 Jan;134(1-2):209-15 [PMID: 18022319]
  30. Psychosomatics. 2008 May-Jun;49(3):191-8 [PMID: 18448772]
  31. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Nov;68(11):1707-16 [PMID: 18052564]
  32. Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;134:382-9 [PMID: 444788]
  33. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009 Jan;19(1):34-40 [PMID: 18823760]
  34. J Biopharm Stat. 2009;19(2):227-46 [PMID: 19212876]
  35. Pain Manag. 2011 Mar;1(2):159-70 [PMID: 24646356]
  36. J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Feb;40(2):161-7 [PMID: 10664922]
  37. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):129-38 [PMID: 8080219]
  38. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Nov;21(6):311-7 [PMID: 17012978]
  39. J Affect Disord. 2006 Jun;92(2-3):185-93 [PMID: 16516977]
  40. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 May;52(5):1577-84 [PMID: 15880832]
  41. J Psychiatr Res. 2005 Jan;39(1):43-53 [PMID: 15504423]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.00symptomsphysicalpainfulduloxetineeffectpatientsclinicallysignificanttrials95%CIdepressiveMDDpainsizesbaselineDATA11studiesnon-60-mgstudymeta-analysisresultsefficacymajordisorderdatabaseclinicaldouble-blindplacebo-controlleddoseslevelsScaleoverallrating3comparedplacebodepressionmeansizeweighted291600reducingOBJECTIVE:reviewillnessleastmildmoderateDSM-IVSOURCES:GlobalEliLillyCompanySTUDYSELECTION:acute760-mg4usedscalemeasurecompletedMarch172011EXTRACTION:VisualAnalog30NumericalRatingscoreBriefPainInventory24-houraverageselectedorderdeterminetrialmeasuresOverallobtainedindividual-trialrelativenumberwithinSYNTHESIS:follows:symptoms-60-mg065213-01945MDD-60-mg184032Across26512534CONCLUSIONS:According60mgdailyeffectiveimprovingindicatesmallThuspermitoneconcludeimpactseverityHoweveraddressalternativescomparatorEfficacybaseline:

Similar Articles

Cited By