Beyond Skinner? A review of relational frame theory: A post-skinnerian account of human language and cognition by Hayes, Barnes-Holmes, and Roche.

J Grayson Osborne
Author Information

Abstract

In their book, Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition (2001), Hayes, Barnes-Holmes and Roche challenge behavior analysts to put aside Skinner and Verbal Behavior in favor of relational frame theory's approach to Human language and cognition. However, when viewed from the contexts of behavior analysis, the principles of behavior analysis, and the principles of the founder of behavior analysis, Relational Frame Theory fits squarely in the Skinnerian, behavior analytic tradition. As with Verbal Behavior, Relational Frame Theory and its theses may be thought of as logical and empirical extensions of that which precedes them.

References

  1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Mar;43(2):155-64 [PMID: 16812411]
  2. Behav Anal. 1984 Fall;7(2):157-67 [PMID: 22478608]
  3. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Jul;14(1):99-105 [PMID: 16811461]
  4. Psychol Bull. 1977 Jan;84(1):93-116 [PMID: 322183]
  5. Behav Anal. 2002 Spring;25(1):29-35 [PMID: 22478375]
  6. Behav Anal. 2000 Spring;23(1):69-84 [PMID: 22478339]
  7. Behav Anal. 2002 Spring;25(1):75-91 [PMID: 22478379]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0behaviorRelationalFrameanalysisHayesBarnes-HolmesRocheVerbalBehaviorrelationalframehumanlanguagecognitionprinciplesTheorybookTheory:Post-SkinnerianAccountHumanLanguageCognition2001challengeanalystsputasideSkinnerfavortheory'sapproachHoweverviewedcontextsfounderfitssquarelySkinneriananalytictraditionthesesmaythoughtlogicalempiricalextensionsprecedesthemBeyondSkinner?reviewtheory:post-skinnerianaccount

Similar Articles

Cited By (5)