Use of chiropractic spinal manipulation in older adults is strongly correlated with supply.

James M Whedon, Yunjie Song, Matthew A Davis, Jonathan D Lurie
Author Information
  1. James M Whedon: Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA. james.m.whedon@dartmouth.edu

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of administrative data.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between regional chiropractic supply and both use and utilization intensity of chiropractic services among Medicare beneficiaries.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Numerous studies have documented trends and patterns in the utilization of chiropractic services in the United States, but little is known about geographic variation in the relationship between chiropractic supply and utilization.
METHODS: We analyzed Medicare claims data for services provided by chiropractic physicians in 2008. We aggregated the data to the hospital referral region level and used small area analysis techniques to generate descriptive statistics. We mapped geographic variations in chiropractic supply, use and utilization intensity (treatments per user), and quantified the variation by coefficient of variation and extremal ratio. We used Spearman rank correlation coefficient to correlate use with supply. We used a logistic regression model for chiropractic use and a multiple linear regression model for chiropractic utilization intensity.
RESULTS: The average regional supply of chiropractic physicians was 21.5 per 100,000 adult capita. The average percentage of beneficiaries who used chiropractic was approximately 7.6 (SD, 3.9). The average utilization intensity was 10.6 (SD, 1.8). Regional chiropractic supply varied more than 14-fold, and chiropractic use varied more than 17-fold. Chiropractic supply and use were positively correlated (Spearman ρ, 0.68; P < 0.001). A low back or cervical spine problem was strongly associated with chiropractic use (odds ratios, 21.6 and 14.3, respectively). Increased chiropractic supply was associated with increased chiropractic use (odds ratio, 1.04) but not with increased chiropractic utilization intensity.
CONCLUSION: Both the supply of chiropractors and the utilization of chiropractic by older US adults varied widely by region. Increased chiropractic supply was associated with increased chiropractic use but not with increased chiropractic utilization intensity. Utilization of chiropractic care is likely sensitive to both supply and patient preference.

References

  1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Jul;17(7):817-25 [PMID: 1386943]
  2. J Chiropr Humanit. 2010 Dec;17(1):40-6 [PMID: 22693475]
  3. Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun;45(3):748-61 [PMID: 20002763]
  4. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1987 Winter;12(4):741-809 [PMID: 3323295]
  5. BMC Public Health. 2008 Apr 01;8:105 [PMID: 18377663]
  6. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1989 Aug;12(4):253-8 [PMID: 2769089]
  7. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 2;147(7):478-91 [PMID: 17909209]
  8. Health Serv Res. 1993 Jun;28(2):183-200 [PMID: 8514499]
  9. Health Serv Res. 2003 Feb;38(1 Pt 1):287-309 [PMID: 12650392]
  10. Am J Public Health. 1991 Apr;81(4):439-42 [PMID: 2003620]
  11. Altern Ther Health Med. 2009 May-Jun;15(3):36-40 [PMID: 19472863]
  12. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 18;138(4):288-98 [PMID: 12585826]
  13. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012 Feb;35(2):101-9 [PMID: 22257945]
  14. Chiropr Osteopat. 2007 Sep 06;15:12 [PMID: 17822549]
  15. Am J Public Health. 2003 Dec;93(12):2111-7 [PMID: 14652343]
  16. Am J Public Health. 1998 May;88(5):771-6 [PMID: 9585743]
  17. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 1;31(23):2707-14 [PMID: 17077740]
  18. Chiropr Osteopat. 2007 Jan 22;15:2 [PMID: 17241465]
  19. Chiropr Osteopat. 2010 Dec 21;18:34 [PMID: 21176137]
  20. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 18;138(4):273-87 [PMID: 12585825]
  21. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD001878 [PMID: 15266458]
  22. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010 Oct;33(8):558-61 [PMID: 21036277]
  23. Inquiry. 2002 Spring;39(1):56-66 [PMID: 12067076]
  24. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16;(2):CD008112 [PMID: 21328304]
  25. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Apr 14;(4):CD005427 [PMID: 20393942]
  26. Spine J. 2004 May-Jun;4(3):335-56 [PMID: 15125860]
  27. Man Ther. 2010 Aug;15(4):315-33 [PMID: 20510644]
  28. J Rural Health. 1999 Spring;15(2):233-9 [PMID: 10511760]
  29. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995 Sep;18(7):464-70 [PMID: 8568429]
  30. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001 Sep;24(7):457-66 [PMID: 11562654]
  31. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Feb 15;33(4 Suppl):S199-213 [PMID: 18204393]

Grants

  1. K01 AT005092/NCCIH NIH HHS
  2. K01 AT006162/NCCIH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cross-Sectional Studies
Geography
Health Services for the Aged
Humans
Manipulation, Chiropractic
Manipulation, Spinal
Medicare
Retrospective Studies
Small-Area Analysis
United States

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0chiropracticsupplyuseutilizationintensityusedincreaseddataservicesvariationaverage6variedassociatedanalysisrelationshipregionalMedicarebeneficiariesgeographicphysiciansregionpercoefficientratioSpearmanregressionmodel21SD31correlated0stronglyoddsIncreasedolderadultsSTUDYDESIGN:Retrospectivecross-sectionaladministrativeOBJECTIVE:examineamongSUMMARYOFBACKGROUNDDATA:NumerousstudiesdocumentedtrendspatternsUnitedStateslittleknownMETHODS:analyzedclaimsprovided2008aggregatedhospitalreferrallevelsmallareatechniquesgeneratedescriptivestatisticsmappedvariationstreatmentsuserquantifiedextremalrankcorrelationcorrelatelogisticmultiplelinearRESULTS:5100000adultcapitapercentageapproximately79108Regional14-fold17-foldChiropracticpositivelyρ68P<001lowbackcervicalspineproblemratios14respectively04CONCLUSION:chiropractorsUSwidelyUtilizationcarelikelysensitivepatientpreferenceUsespinalmanipulation

Similar Articles

Cited By