Why HURT? A review of clinical instruments for headache management.

Dawn C Buse, C Mark Sollars, Timothy J Steiner, Rigmor H Jensen, Mohammed A Al Jumah, Richard B Lipton
Author Information
  1. Dawn C Buse: Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. dbuse@montefiore.org

Abstract

The Global Campaign against Headache, directed by the non-governmental organization Lifting The Burden (LTB) in official relations with the World Health Organization (WHO), aspires to reduce the global burden of headache. Ultimately this calls for improvements in headache management, largely in primary care, where most people with headache receive medical care. In support, LTB is developing a range of headache management aids for primary care. Presently, no single instrument covers the range of assessment and decision-making necessary for successful headache management, and few make the important link between assessment and clinical advice. Expressly to fill this gap, LTB has developed a new instrument: the Headache Under-Response to Treatment (HURT) Questionnaire, an eight-item, self-administered questionnaire addressing headache frequency, disability, medication use and effect, perceptions of headache "control" and knowledge of diagnosis. This instrument is intended not only to evaluate current headache outcomes and assess the need for and response to treatment, but also to provide guidance on appropriate actions towards treatment optimization. The first draft of the HURT was created by an expert consensus group, meeting at WHO headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland. The final version came about through multiple refinements following psychometric testing. Assessment of clinical utility is ongoing in multiple countries.

References

  1. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33 [PMID: 8628042]
  2. Value Health. 2005 Sep-Oct;8(5):591-600 [PMID: 16176497]
  3. Neurology. 1997 Mar;48(3 Suppl 3):S10-5 [PMID: 9071264]
  4. Psychosomatics. 2009 Nov-Dec;50(6):613-21 [PMID: 19996233]
  5. Headache. 2002 Nov-Dec;42(10):1006-15 [PMID: 12453032]
  6. Neurol Sci. 2009 May;30 Suppl 1:S89-93 [PMID: 19415434]
  7. Headache. 2008 Oct;48(9):1294-310 [PMID: 18547268]
  8. Pain. 2007 Jul;130(1-2):144-56 [PMID: 17493754]
  9. Ann Neurol. 2008 Feb;63(2):148-58 [PMID: 18059010]
  10. Headache. 1995 Oct;35(9):534-9 [PMID: 8530277]
  11. J Headache Pain. 2010 Dec;11(6):451-5 [PMID: 21080023]
  12. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7 [PMID: 16717171]
  13. Cephalalgia. 2011 Feb;31(3):301-15 [PMID: 20813784]
  14. Headache. 2005 May;45(5):513-9 [PMID: 15953268]
  15. J Headache Pain. 2005 Oct;6(5):373-7 [PMID: 16362709]
  16. J Headache Pain. 2007 Oct;8 Suppl 1:S3-47 [PMID: 18034215]
  17. Neurology. 2003 Aug 12;61(3):375-82 [PMID: 12913201]
  18. Neurology. 1994 May;44(5):837-42 [PMID: 8190284]
  19. JAMA. 1999 Nov 10;282(18):1737-44 [PMID: 10568646]
  20. Headache. 2000 Mar;40(3):204-15 [PMID: 10759923]
  21. Headache. 1996 Sep;36(8):484-92 [PMID: 8824004]
  22. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010 Apr;81(4):428-32 [PMID: 20164501]
  23. Headache. 1993 Jul-Aug;33(7):351-8 [PMID: 8376093]
  24. Cephalalgia. 2009 Jul;29(7):751-9 [PMID: 19239676]
  25. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988 Apr;56(2):218-23 [PMID: 3286705]
  26. Cephalalgia. 2007 Oct;27(10):1156-65 [PMID: 17784854]
  27. Neurol Sci. 2004 Oct;25 Suppl 3:S105-7 [PMID: 15549514]
  28. Curr Opin Neurol. 2005 Jun;18(3):305-10 [PMID: 15891417]
  29. Headache. 2005 Oct;45(9):1124-39 [PMID: 16178943]
  30. Qual Life Res. 2003 Dec;12(8):963-74 [PMID: 14651415]
  31. Headache. 2000 Sep;40(8):647-56 [PMID: 10971661]
  32. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Jul;20(7):1125-35 [PMID: 15265257]
  33. Cephalalgia. 2007 Mar;27(3):193-210 [PMID: 17381554]
  34. Headache. 2003 Apr;43(4):336-42 [PMID: 12656704]
  35. J Clin Psychol. 1998 Feb;54(2):247-56 [PMID: 9467769]
  36. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988 Dec;56(6):893-7 [PMID: 3204199]
  37. Cephalalgia. 1998 Jan;18(1):44-51 [PMID: 9601624]
  38. J Headache Pain. 2008 Oct;9(5):301-8 [PMID: 18679769]
  39. Headache. 2002 Jul-Aug;42(7):663-74 [PMID: 12482221]
  40. Neurol Sci. 2009 May;30 Suppl 1:S85-8 [PMID: 19415433]
  41. Cephalalgia. 1995 Feb;15(1):31-6 [PMID: 7758095]
  42. Behav Res Ther. 1996 Aug;34(8):669-73 [PMID: 8870294]
  43. Headache. 2012 Jan;52(1):18-36 [PMID: 22268775]
  44. Headache. 2008 Mar;48(3):385-94 [PMID: 18028378]
  45. Neurology. 2000 Sep 26;55(6):754-62 [PMID: 10993991]
  46. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83 [PMID: 1593914]
  47. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009 May;84(5):422-35 [PMID: 19411439]
  48. Cephalalgia. 2011 Nov;31(15):1549-60 [PMID: 22019575]
  49. Headache. 2001 Apr;41(4):402-9 [PMID: 11318888]
  50. Psychiatry Res. 1991 Apr;37(1):11-23 [PMID: 1862159]
  51. Headache. 1992 May;32(5):239-41 [PMID: 1628962]
  52. Cephalalgia. 2003 Jul;23(6):441-50 [PMID: 12807523]
  53. Neurology. 2008 Aug 19;71(8):559-66 [PMID: 18711108]
  54. Headache. 1981 Jul;21(4):164-9 [PMID: 7263228]
  55. J Headache Pain. 2005 Dec;6(6):429-40 [PMID: 16388337]
  56. Pain. 2000 Oct;88(1):41-52 [PMID: 11098098]
  57. Headache. 2006 Feb;46(2):233-9 [PMID: 16492232]
  58. Neurology. 2001 Dec 11;57(11):2034-9 [PMID: 11739822]
  59. Headache. 2006 Feb;46(2):240-52 [PMID: 16492233]
  60. Headache. 2008 Jan;48(1):72-8 [PMID: 17868352]
  61. Headache. 2003 Jun;43(6):628-35 [PMID: 12786922]
  62. Headache. 2004 May;44(5):387-98 [PMID: 15147245]
  63. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006 Sep;32(3):287-93 [PMID: 16939853]
  64. Headache. 1990 Nov;30(11):729-34 [PMID: 2074167]
  65. Headache. 2007 Mar;47(3):413-26 [PMID: 17371358]
  66. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13 [PMID: 11556941]
  67. Lancet Neurol. 2004 Apr;3(4):204-5 [PMID: 15039030]

MeSH Term

Evidence-Based Medicine
Female
Headache
Headache Disorders, Primary
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Male
Pain Measurement
Primary Health Care
Psychometrics
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0headachemanagementLTBcareclinicalHeadacheWHOprimaryrangeinstrumentassessmentHURTtreatmentmultipleGlobalCampaigndirectednon-governmentalorganizationLiftingBurdenofficialrelationsWorldHealthOrganizationaspiresreduceglobalburdenUltimatelycallsimprovementslargelypeoplereceivemedicalsupportdevelopingaidsPresentlysinglecoversdecision-makingnecessarysuccessfulmakeimportantlinkadviceExpresslyfillgapdevelopednewinstrument:Under-ResponseTreatmentQuestionnaireeight-itemself-administeredquestionnaireaddressingfrequencydisabilitymedicationuseeffectperceptions"control"knowledgediagnosisintendedevaluatecurrentoutcomesassessneedresponsealsoprovideguidanceappropriateactionstowardsoptimizationfirstdraftcreatedexpertconsensusgroupmeetingheadquartersGenevaSwitzerlandfinalversioncamerefinementsfollowingpsychometrictestingAssessmentutilityongoingcountriesHURT?reviewinstruments

Similar Articles

Cited By