Care for kin: within-group relatedness and allomaternal care are positively correlated and conserved throughout the mammalian phylogeny.

Michael Briga, Ido Pen, Jonathan Wright
Author Information
  1. Michael Briga: Theoretical Biology Group, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. michbriga@gmail.com

Abstract

With an increasing amount of data becoming available, comparative analyses have called attention to the associations between cooperative breeding, monogamy and relatedness. We focus here upon the association between allomaternal care and relatedness among females within a social unit. Previous studies found a positive association, but such results date back to before molecular tools were in common use, they considered only a few mammalian orders, neglected phylogenetic clustering and/or did not correct for group sizes. Here, we use molecular data on relatedness from 44 species of mammals to investigate the phylogenetic clustering of, and the association between, allomaternal care and relatedness among females within a social unit. We find (i) a strong phylogenetic signal for allomaternal care and a moderate one for relatedness and group size, and (ii) a positive association between relatedness and allomaternal care, even when correcting for the smaller than average group sizes in species with allomaternal care. We also find that, in species without allomaternal care, adult females often live with unrelated females even when groups are small. We discuss these results in the light of recent evidence for the role of kin selection and the monogamy hypothesis in cooperative breeding.

References

  1. Mol Ecol. 2005 Jun;14(7):2181-96 [PMID: 15910336]
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 29;92(18):8092-9 [PMID: 7667250]
  3. Evolution. 2003 Apr;57(4):717-45 [PMID: 12778543]
  4. Am Nat. 2002 Dec;160(6):712-26 [PMID: 18707460]
  5. Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Jun 7;279(1736):2151-6 [PMID: 22279167]
  6. J Evol Biol. 2009 Dec;22(12):2445-57 [PMID: 19824927]
  7. Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Jun 7;273(1592):1375-83 [PMID: 16777726]
  8. J Evol Biol. 2010 Mar;23(3):494-508 [PMID: 20070460]
  9. Science. 2002 Apr 5;296(5565):69-72 [PMID: 11935014]
  10. Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Sep 7;274(1622):2179-85 [PMID: 17609183]
  11. J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):1-16 [PMID: 5875341]
  12. Nature. 1999 Oct 28;401(6756):877-84 [PMID: 10553904]
  13. Bioinformatics. 2008 Jan 1;24(1):129-31 [PMID: 18006550]

MeSH Term

Animals
Bayes Theorem
Behavior, Animal
Cooperative Behavior
Female
Mammals
Maternal Behavior
Microsatellite Repeats
Phylogeny
Population Density
Reproduction
Social Behavior
Social Environment
Species Specificity

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0relatednessallomaternalcareassociationfemalesphylogeneticgroupspeciesdatacooperativebreedingmonogamyamongwithinsocialunitpositiveresultsmolecularusemammalianclusteringsizesfindevenincreasingamountbecomingavailablecomparativeanalysescalledattentionassociationsfocusuponPreviousstudiesfounddatebacktoolscommonconsideredordersneglectedand/orcorrect44mammalsinvestigatestrongsignalmoderateonesizeiicorrectingsmalleraveragealsowithoutadultoftenliveunrelatedgroupssmalldiscusslightrecentevidencerolekinselectionhypothesisCarekin:within-grouppositivelycorrelatedconservedthroughoutphylogeny

Similar Articles

Cited By